Find your diamond
Find your jewelry
shape
carat
color
clarity

Well I just bought a pair of OECs

AV_

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Aug 5, 2018
Messages
3,108
"Too much" is what I'm aiming for!
It is!

I sort of remember that the ring with pears & two marquises adds up to about five carats; truth be told, I have no idea if a version with rounds makes sense.
 

dreamer_dachsie

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Dec 16, 2007
Messages
24,346
Well I like where you are headed and BIG and BOLD seems the way to go.
 

distracts

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
5,460
Ok I picked up the diamonds today from Southwest Diamond Cutters - the one that was the “problem” one looks SO GOOD! The only way I can tell them apart now is that the one that didn’t get recut is more off-round and has chips, but I can’t tell just by looking at the way they sparkle.

The one that was recut went from 1.21 to 1.17. The other is 1.14. Both around 6.5mm with some variance because they’re not super round.

Unaltered on top, recut below:

064367D3-FD04-4A84-A549-8E377974A816.jpeg
6ED6B728-B031-4A7A-BCA4-18DE4224E61D.jpeg

I know the differences before were subtle but they would have driven me crazy if they were set together and now I’m entirely pleased with the pair.
 

distracts

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
5,460
(For anyone who doesn't want to backread - the bottom stone under the table turned all off or all on - and only rarely the latter - it didn't, like, scintillate. Which it now does.)

ALSO that stuff that I thought was inclusions and everyone else thought was dirt but I could not for the life of me clean off? Gone. It was dirt. It just needed a much, much more serious cleaning than I was giving it.

Also here are the other numbers, for anyone curious, since we don't talk about OEC numbers much (hi @sledge this may be of interest to you!) :

Stone 1 (unaltered):
ct 1.14
Diameter 6.54mm
Depth 65.48%
Crown Height: 18.45%
Pav Depth: 43.89%
Culet size: 4.96%
Table size: 44.1%
Crown angle: 32.83
Pav angle: 43.09
Star length: 42.8%
Lower halves: 55.2%
Girdle Thickness: 2.98%
Girdle min-max: Extremely thin to very thin

Stone 2 (original):
ct 1.21
Diameter 6.6mm
Depth 65.88%
Crown Height: 17.98%
Pav Depth: 43.19%
Culet size: 9.98%
Table size: 48.3%
Crown angle: 35.13
Pav angle: 44.01
Star length: 40.2%
Lower halves: 51.5%
Girdle Thickness: 4.30%
Girdle min-max: Extremely thin to very thin

Stone 2 (post recut):
ct 1.17
Culet size: very large
Table size: 45%
Crown angle: 33
Pav angle: 44
Star length: 40%
Lower halves: 50%
Girdle Thickness: 5.5%

Compare to the stats of the AVR I bought the other week:
ct 0.745
Diameter: 5.7mm
Depth 65.3%
Crown Height: 18%
Pav Depth: 44.1%
Culet: pointed
Table size: 49.2%
Crown angle: 35.3
Pav angle: 41.4
Girdle min-max: thin to slightly thick

It has me interested in the proportions of my other OECs - I suspect they're mostly pretty close to the first one because I definitely have a look I like.
 
Be a part of the community It's free, join today!

Need Something Special?

Get a quote from multiple trusted and vetted jewelers.

Holloway Cut Advisor



Diamond Eye Candy

Click to view full-size image.
Top