- Joined
- Oct 20, 2007
- Messages
- 6,418
For posterity I found a better photo in Facetfire's thread and as you can see, it's not a particularly wide setting so wouldn't show a lot of metal looking down at the diamond from the top. I think it's a lot more delicate than it looks with FF's 2.3ct.Starzin: That ring is quite pretty! I'm surprised at how it looks, very nice. I think my center would be a bit too small to pull it off though, would have too much metal showing on my gf's small fingers.
Speaking as a 8.5Her fingers should be around a size 3 3/4 for a snug fit..
TristanC|1327890291|3114577 said:So victor showed how fine a bezel he could set, and these are the proportions. I'm a bit torn. I THINK i prefer a non bezelled appearance, but I THINK a bezel might be advantageous to the colour of the stone.
How would you all vote? Bezel? Or no Bezel?
Oh, and if anyone has ever done a colour enhancement cup with LM/SK/VC, could you please post a picture from the profile view and the top of it? He said he'll see my stone to check if a colour enhancement cup would work its magic. But I wanted the profile to show only platinum... VC says it should be possible.
TristanC|1327889981|3114576 said:LD: I'm amazed at the breadth of your collection! I know what you are saying, and I can See it from the pics. Hmm. I do like the blue a lot more in terms of how it doesn't lose as much size. Do you think the metal colour plays a big part?
Victor explains it like this:
It's literally a cup of metal wherein we would almost copy the pavillion facets of the stone in rose gold and sit the stone on top of the cup. It would cover the bottom of the stone except a small area around the culet. From the bottom of the ring you'd see a cup of metal covering the bottom of the stone.
Starzin|1327974954|3115250 said:I agree that rose gold can be of such varying colour that it can be lovely - like LD's - or overpowering. I prefer the contrast of the white bezel against the pink and you can see a video here http://gilletts.com.au/product_info...te=GILLETTS_AJ&ezcamp=GILLETTS_0¤cy=AUD of a pink in a white bezel which I think is not dissimilar to yours and so illustrates very well what it might look like.
However there are other ways of enhancing the pink one is, as Acebruin pointed out, having a rose gold cup and Victor explained for BrightIce at one stage:
Victor explains it like this:
It's literally a cup of metal wherein we would almost copy the pavillion facets of the stone in rose gold and sit the stone on top of the cup. It would cover the bottom of the stone except a small area around the culet. From the bottom of the ring you'd see a cup of metal covering the bottom of the stone.
Don't like this idea at all, unless the metal conforms to the pavilion surface perfectly and makes complete contact in all areas dirt and grease *will* get trapped and it'll be impossible to clean thoroughly, and you're left with less light return face-up (grease alters critical angle) and without the benefits of foil-wrapping (plain ol' reflection, only if diamond and metal cup surfaces contact without breach, the shinier the metal cup surface the better)
Another way is to have the bezel in white gold and the basket underneath in rose gold.
Yet another is to set a pink melee under the stone. Can't find the thread but someone did this with a yellow and I think there was quite a good pic of it. Does anyone know what I'm referring to?
Haven's OMB w/ large open culet
ETA: This Google images page might also help you see various colour ways
http://www.google.com.au/search?q=b...=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=2&sqi=2&ved=0CEEQ_AUoAQ
TristanC|1328094686|3116255 said:Acebruin: It is Fancy Purplish Pink. That cup is the thick rose gold area going around the diamond? Sorry if I'm being obtuse.
rainydaze|1328129173|3116661 said:tristan have you thought of or explored the idea of half moons or traps next to the center, then the bullets or baguettes? i'm thinking that might help elongate the ring to help avoid the the sort of squat look of the no-example gypsy posted? assuming you don't care for that look, either, of course.
diamondseeker2006|1328147988|3116898 said:Tristan, seriously? No ring insurance? Oh gosh. I probably wouldn't have anything worth over $3-5000 in that case. Yikes!