- Joined
- Jun 3, 2008
- Messages
- 4,684
Hi, Holly! We missed ya last night!
Agreed. Sadly, I think it would have been different if she were a man.Date: 10/3/2008 1:37:38 PM
Author: Ellen
I know what you mean, but I don''t think he could, and have it be received well. I mean, obviously he was capable, but if he did, the undecideds might interpret that as bullying/unfairly attacking her. He had to play it safe, which is what he did. And all''s well, he still came out the clear winner.Date: 10/3/2008 1:27:33 PM
Author: mrssalvo
Biden has 35 years of experience. I''m honestly suprised he didn''t blow her out of the water and IMO he didn''t.
Most definitely.Date: 10/3/2008 2:03:49 PM
Author: MoonWater
Agreed. Sadly, I think it would have been different if she were a man.Date: 10/3/2008 1:37:38 PM
Author: Ellen
I know what you mean, but I don''t think he could, and have it be received well. I mean, obviously he was capable, but if he did, the undecideds might interpret that as bullying/unfairly attacking her. He had to play it safe, which is what he did. And all''s well, he still came out the clear winner.Date: 10/3/2008 1:27:33 PM
Author: mrssalvo
Biden has 35 years of experience. I''m honestly suprised he didn''t blow her out of the water and IMO he didn''t.
Thanks Emm! Dos Equis, mi amiga!Date: 10/3/2008 2:02:58 PM
Author: Irishgrrrl
Hi, Holly! We missed ya last night!
Sí! DOS EQUIS!!!Date: 10/3/2008 2:13:02 PM
Author: HollyS
Thanks Emm! Dos Equis, mi amiga!Date: 10/3/2008 2:02:58 PM
Author: Irishgrrrl
Hi, Holly! We missed ya last night!
I actually agree with this! (not trying to sound surprised or anything).Date: 10/3/2008 2:00:38 PM
Author: HollyS
And that''s really the point. Why didn''t he?Date: 10/3/2008 1:27:33 PM
Author: mrssalvo
Biden has 35 years of experience. I''m honestly suprised he didn''t blow her out of the water and IMO he didn''t.
If anything, it was a draw. Biden sounded good, if you don''t know that he had several outright fabrications in his ''Obama voted this way, McCain voted that way'' answers. Which wasn''t all that smart, since everyone can read/look up the Congressional Record. She was, IMO, much too ''folksy'', but for some reason that stuff plays well across America. Go figure. She out and out avoided answering some questions; and while I don''t think that''s a bad ''strategy'' in a campaign, once again it doesn''t serve the American people who want all politicians to just ''spit it out'' and be clear about it.
I think, with 35 years in the Senate, that Mr. Biden could have something, anything that he could point to -- positively -- that he has accomplished in those years. If he has, why haven''t we heard about his record? I suppose we could all reseach his background, but shouldn''t the Obama camp provide some ''feel good'' info about their Veep? Here we had a thoroughly entrenched senior senator during the eight year Bush debacle, as were many other Democrats, why couldn''t our Senate (or Congress) get their act together in those years?
She obviously got under his skin, and he wasn''t able to prevent himself from reacting; which was a mistake in television. He had no comeback when she pointed out his derogatory comments about Obama, back when he himself was a candidate. And really, if he had those misgivings then, why is he the VP for Obama now? Must our politicians always lay aside their personal convictions to serve their Party''s agenda? Or do you suppose he thinks it''s at least his foot in the Oval Office door?
Let''s face facts. If you''re a Dem, or a Republican, you already know how you will vote. You already think you know who ''won'' the debate. But the ''undecideds'' still don''t have the clear answers they need, because both camps are being quite vague about the HOW of getting their ''plans'' to work for the American people.
Date: 10/3/2008 2:00:38 PM
Author: HollyS
If anything, it was a draw.
Sweet!Date: 10/3/2008 3:32:32 PM
Author: EBree
Date: 10/3/2008 2:00:38 PM
Author: HollyS
If anything, it was a draw.
The ''undecideds,'' from the polls we have, would disagree with you.
As with the Obama-McCain debate last Friday, the vast majority of the insta-polls went to the Democratic ticket. Biden won the CBS poll of undecideds 46-21, and the CNN poll of debate watchers 51-36. Independents in the large MediaCurves focus group panel went for Biden about 2:1.
Even the Fox News quick poll has Biden winning 55 percent to 45 percent for Palin.
Source
Date: 10/3/2008 2:44:35 PM
Author: TravelingGal
And I hate her because I don''t understand how she could have had 5 kids...one the same month my daughter was born, is in her 40s, and she looks 100 times better than me. B*tch. "
LMAO!!!
Actully Travel, from your wedding pics I think you look 200 times better than her! I only wish I have those fancy clothes she has!!!
I''m sitting here nodding my head at the computer screen, in agreement with this remark. I didn''t get to watch any of the debates (Presidential or VP) as my TVs are permanently broken -- satellite television often stinks -- but I feel like even if I had, after all I''ve read and watched I still feel like I am left with no one to vote for, not because I missed the debates but because I feel completely unrepresented by both sides. GRRR! It frustrates me so.Date: 10/3/2008 2:00:38 PM
Author: HollyS
Let''s face facts. If you''re a Dem, or a Republican, you already know how you will vote. You already think you know who ''won'' the debate. But the ''undecideds'' still don''t have the clear answers they need, because both camps are being quite vague about the HOW of getting their ''plans'' to work for the American people.
That was a ''perception'' comment; my perception. Neither candidate gave a stellar performance; although she didn''t do the whole ''sucking routine'' that so many of you had hoped for. If she had, the poll wouldn''t be that close.Date: 10/3/2008 3:32:32 PM
Author: EBree
Date: 10/3/2008 2:00:38 PM
Author: HollyS
If anything, it was a draw.
The ''undecideds,'' from the polls we have, would disagree with you.
As with the Obama-McCain debate last Friday, the vast majority of the insta-polls went to the Democratic ticket. Biden won the CBS poll of undecideds 46-21, and the CNN poll of debate watchers 51-36. Independents in the large MediaCurves focus group panel went for Biden about 2:1.
Even the Fox News quick poll has Biden winning 55 percent to 45 percent for Palin.
Source
Holly, I really don''t think people "wanted" her to, as much as "expected" her to. And there was every good reason to expect it. I''m glad she didn''t though.Date: 10/3/2008 7:33:48 PM
Author: HollyS
That was a ''perception'' comment; my perception. Neither candidate gave a stellar performance; although she didn''t do the whole ''sucking routine'' that so many of you had hoped for. If she had, the poll wouldn''t be that close.
I am undecided not because I believe anything is going to change, but because the idea of voting for the lesser of two evils as opposed to voting because I stand behind what a candidate believes is quite frustrating. I certainly don''t live under a rock, I am well-informed, I know what the candidates stand for, it''s just that neither represents what I want in a president and I don''t think watching a debate will change that for me. I have always been registered "Decline to state" because I sit somewhere in between the ideas and ideals of both political parties. It''s a rather frustrating place to be.Date: 10/3/2008 7:33:29 PM
Author: Allisonfaye
I just don''t get, at this point, how there can even be any undecideds. What do you think is going to change? If you don''t know what these people are all about by now, you are living under a rock.
Scary thought: President Palin
If that doesn''t shove you over the edge, I don''t know what will.
Have you been on these threads before?Date: 10/3/2008 7:50:10 PM
Author: Ellen
Holly, I really don''t think people ''wanted'' her to, as much as ''expected'' her to. And there was every good reason to expect it. I''m glad she didn''t though.Date: 10/3/2008 7:33:48 PM
Author: HollyS
That was a ''perception'' comment; my perception. Neither candidate gave a stellar performance; although she didn''t do the whole ''sucking routine'' that so many of you had hoped for. If she had, the poll wouldn''t be that close.
Obama as President. In fact, Obama as anything but a has-been, washed-up, nobody gives a hoot about you anymore, you''re yesterday''s news, the used-to-be flavor of the month, D-list celeb that he will become when he loses.Date: 10/3/2008 7:33:29 PM
Author: Allisonfaye
I just don''t get, at this point, how there can even be any undecideds. What do you think is going to change? If you don''t know what these people are all about by now, you are living under a rock.
Scary thought: President Palin
If that doesn''t shove you over the edge, I don''t know what will.
I tend to agree. Hence the 15 pages poking fun at her accent.Date: 10/4/2008 3:33:31 PM
Author: HollyS
Have you been on these threads before?Date: 10/3/2008 7:50:10 PM
Author: Ellen
Holly, I really don't think people 'wanted' her to, as much as 'expected' her to. And there was every good reason to expect it. I'm glad she didn't though.Date: 10/3/2008 7:33:48 PM
Author: HollyS
That was a 'perception' comment; my perception. Neither candidate gave a stellar performance; although she didn't do the whole 'sucking routine' that so many of you had hoped for. If she had, the poll wouldn't be that close.
I think quite a few folks here were desirous of abject failure from the Rep Veep!
or Sam HarrisDate: 10/2/2008 11:04:50 PM
Author: MoonWater
I want Palin to debate Christopher Hitchens.
Heeeyyy!! I posted it FIRST over in the Dem thread!!!!Date: 10/3/2008 4:15:55 PM
Author: MoonWater
Speaking of which: The Sentences of Sarah Palin, Diagrammed
lol Yes, but I choose to believe the best in people. I realize this may be construed as a huge character flaw. I accept that.Date: 10/4/2008 3:33:31 PM
Author: HollyS
Have you been on these threads before?Date: 10/3/2008 7:50:10 PM
Author: Ellen
Holly, I really don''t think people ''wanted'' her to, as much as ''expected'' her to. And there was every good reason to expect it. I''m glad she didn''t though.Date: 10/3/2008 7:33:48 PM
Author: HollyS
That was a ''perception'' comment; my perception. Neither candidate gave a stellar performance; although she didn''t do the whole ''sucking routine'' that so many of you had hoped for. If she had, the poll wouldn''t be that close.
I think quite a few folks here were desirous of abject failure from the Rep Veep!
So true, Kimberly.Date: 10/3/2008 7:55:28 PM
Author: KimberlyH
I am undecided not because I believe anything is going to change, but because the idea of voting for the lesser of two evils as opposed to voting because I stand behind what a candidate believes is quite frustrating. I certainly don''t live under a rock, I am well-informed, I know what the candidates stand for, it''s just that neither represents what I want in a president and I don''t think watching a debate will change that for me. I have always been registered ''Decline to state'' because I sit somewhere in between the ideas and ideals of both political parties. It''s a rather frustrating place to be.Date: 10/3/2008 7:33:29 PM
Author: Allisonfaye
I just don''t get, at this point, how there can even be any undecideds. What do you think is going to change? If you don''t know what these people are all about by now, you are living under a rock.
Scary thought: President Palin
If that doesn''t shove you over the edge, I don''t know what will.
My belief, based on my experiences in my personal and professional life, is that the 10% far left and 10% far right who have the time and the resources to affect change are the people who rule this country. The rest of us, who sit somewhere in the middle of the bell curve, go about our daily lives, working, taking care of families, etc. and feeling unsure as to how we can make real change and elect a president, a congress, a state and local government, who truly represent most of us. If we examine ideals at a base level we all want many of the same things: those who need care to recieve it, successful businesses that create jobs, a sense of security (i.e. that this country and our communities are safe places to live), forward progress in science and technology, etc. I think the party lines are so fierce that we as a society often forget that when it comes down to it we do all want what is best for our families, our friends, our neighbors, even if we don''t always agree on what those things are, and if we approached gov''t from that perspective, a place of commonality as opposed to focusing on our differences, perhaps there would be less arguing and more seeking common ground.Date: 10/5/2008 9:35:41 AM
Author: fisherofmengirly
So true, Kimberly.Date: 10/3/2008 7:55:28 PM
Author: KimberlyH
I am undecided not because I believe anything is going to change, but because the idea of voting for the lesser of two evils as opposed to voting because I stand behind what a candidate believes is quite frustrating. I certainly don''t live under a rock, I am well-informed, I know what the candidates stand for, it''s just that neither represents what I want in a president and I don''t think watching a debate will change that for me. I have always been registered ''Decline to state'' because I sit somewhere in between the ideas and ideals of both political parties. It''s a rather frustrating place to be.Date: 10/3/2008 7:33:29 PM
Author: Allisonfaye
I just don''t get, at this point, how there can even be any undecideds. What do you think is going to change? If you don''t know what these people are all about by now, you are living under a rock.
Scary thought: President Palin
If that doesn''t shove you over the edge, I don''t know what will.
There are many, many people that either of the two ''main'' parties consider up for grabs at this point. The thing is, though, as long as our country remains locked into voting either of the two ''big ticket'' contenders, there won''t be much changes, I''m convinced. That''s why this election year was so interesting in the beginning, because a few of the ''other parties'' had some serious support. But like in the past, it fizzled out and now people think they have to vote one way or the other, for the ''lesser of two evils.''
My husband and I go back and forth on this issue, because I still tend to see any vote NOT for one of the two top contenders as a vote just not made, while he states that you have to vote your conscious, and if either of us did that, it couldn''t be for either of the top two contenders. So, I guess it just depends how many of the ''sway'' voters end up ultimately choosing a side of the ''less evil'' or if they choose to vote who they''d wanted to begin with.
Would it be enough to get that person elected? Most probably not. But would it be enough to shake up the politics that are corrupt around here? I should think so! IF there was an outpouring of people no longer sticking to party lines and instead voting based on information (and not a person''s accent, for heaven''s sake!!), it would seriously shake up things in DC. And it would be a lot more like what those who formed our nation had in mind when they created this awesome country.