aisa901
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2021
- Messages
- 75
Maybe someone with a better understanding of physics/chem can confirm this, but in order to have high enough pressure to create a HPHT diamond, I don't think you could do this in a vacuum?HPHT diamond growth occurs within massive pressure cookers. Small diamond seeds are placed into a growth cell and graphite is inserted on top of the diamond seeds. The pressure cooker is heated to 1500°C and pressurized to approximately 70,000 times the pressure at sea level.
Pressure cooker certainly seems to exclude them being exposed to the atmosphere....Again, I'm not a scientist......but...
Pressure is a result of collisions of gas molecules/atoms with the walls of a container, so the fewer molecules/atoms present the lower the pressure. ... When you create a vacuum, the vacuum pump removes a large amount of the gas from the container, so the pressure of the gas falls to a very low value.
I've never seen or read a single source talk about a vacuums when explaining the HPTP process, the term vacuum is always used to explain the CVD process.
I will again refer to the GIA page I linked previously:
"In greater detail, HPHT diamond growth takes place in a small capsule inside an apparatus capable of generating very high pressures"...
(IGI uses the term "staggering pressure")
Vs.
"In greater detail, CVD diamond growth takes place inside a vacuum chamber filled with a hydrogen and carbon-containing gas, such as methane."
This would mean growers are respecting patents....seems unlikely.
With diamonds being grown all over the world, exactly which patents apply in both the US and India ( for example) to say nothing of China and Russia.
Both statements seem more promotional than factual.
I don't know enough about this to comment, maybe @Ada Diamonds CEO can enlighten us about claim?
THis would mean that growers are keeping this secret from their customers... This makes zero sense. I've had in depth discussions with major growers. According to real market info, the majority of blue lab grown diamonds are irradiated - and I believe it's well over 99%
It seems to me that if someone was growing Fancy Vivid Blue diamonds with no post growth treatment, they'd be shouting about it. GIA was making a big deal about a single stone.....
I am so very curious about this.....
My point exactly, why would they not just come clean with this and call a spade a spade? Whether it's doping with boron or irradiating post growth, it's still tampering with the diamond. I could be wrong, but if I am, I've seen at least 30 different online sources perpetuating this boron during growth phase lie.
I only provided the GIA links to quickly show one reputable (?) source of info that helped inform my opinion/theory/ or "hypothesis" if you will
However, I would agree that some CVD diamonds are irradiated post growth to be blue, but this is openly talked about on the world wide web.
And maybe both things are true, blue boron containing diamonds exist, and blue irradiated diamonds exist?