dazedland
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2005
- Messages
- 401
i am quite sure the impact damage did NOT happen on the finger. unless dazedland was punch drunk for a week and feeling no pain, the impact had to of happened off the finger.Date: 2/28/2006 6:09:27 PM
Author: Matatora
Okay this may just be my own obtuse nature but are the cracks in the photos the impact marks? I don’t understand since one set of the marks seems like it was above the finger line and the other on the opposite side of her finger and below? It seems like you would have to close your hand in a door, or something like that to have that set of markings…I don’t get it?![]()
Date: 2/28/2006 6:19:34 PM
Author: belle
i am quite sure the impact damage did NOT happen on the finger. unless dazedland was punch drunk for a week and feeling no pain, the impact had to of happened off the finger.Date: 2/28/2006 6:09:27 PM
Author: Matatora
Okay this may just be my own obtuse nature but are the cracks in the photos the impact marks? I don’t understand since one set of the marks seems like it was above the finger line and the other on the opposite side of her finger and below? It seems like you would have to close your hand in a door, or something like that to have that set of markings…I don’t get it?![]()
well..we can continue to make guesses about what might have happened if you want. i don't really see the point though. wf examined the ring and they had two outside sources examine the ring. they all came to the same conclusion...the ring was impacted by something. they didn't say what. probably because they don't know. now if they have seen it and don't know what caused the damage, how in the world can anyone sit here looking at pictures to tell what it was or how it happened?Date: 2/28/2006 6:28:18 PM
Author: mrssalvo
Date: 2/28/2006 6:19:34 PM
Author: belle
i am quite sure the impact damage did NOT happen on the finger. unless dazedland was punch drunk for a week and feeling no pain, the impact had to of happened off the finger.Date: 2/28/2006 6:09:27 PM
Author: Matatora
Okay this may just be my own obtuse nature but are the cracks in the photos the impact marks? I don’t understand since one set of the marks seems like it was above the finger line and the other on the opposite side of her finger and below? It seems like you would have to close your hand in a door, or something like that to have that set of markings…I don’t get it?![]()
so how did something impact damage her ring, while she wasn't wearing it and only damage the 2 places and not smash the whole ring or the head which is perfectly intact?
t
I agree totally. I really believe you would have felt some amount of pain if you caused the damage while wearing it. It was shredded!!!Date: 2/28/2006 5:05:36 PM
Author: mrssalvo
Well I''m no expert but I honestly cannot see how they are saying it was you''re fault, but whatever. I will be interested to see what the experts here who chimed in with their opinions on the other thread about the possible of porisity and poor craftmanship being the culprit have to say now that WF is saying that they are wrong and dazed is to blame.
I sure would not have them remake it the same way. It would be way to highmaintance a setting for me if that''s the case and who''d want to throw that kind of $$ down the drain always having to deal with stones popping out or accidently bending it? I just don''t get it and am axious to see John''s pictures.
Date: 2/28/2006 6:38:58 PM
Author: belle
well..we can continue to make guesses about what might have happened if you want. i don't really see the point though. wf examined the ring and they had two outside sources examine the ring. they all came to the same conclusion...the ring was impacted by something. they didn't say what. probably because they don't know. now if they have seen it and don't know what caused the damage, how in the world can anyone sit here looking at pictures to tell what it was or how it happened?Date: 2/28/2006 6:28:18 PM
t
Date: 2/28/2006 4:46:19 PM
Author: Demelza
I realize that platinum is very soft and malleable, but I didn''t think it was brittle (i.e. prone to cracking). I thought that the bonds between the molecules were so strong that the metal could bend quite a lot without actually coming apart??? Perhaps it''s the case, as Mara said, that there were so many diamonds in the ring that there just wasn''t enough platinum to hold it together under pressure. I hope John comes on to explain! Makes me a bit worried about my very thin, pave MB ring!!
Actually, I can.Date: 2/28/2006 6:17:57 PM
Author: pebbles
I don''t get it either. Like everyone said, I couldn''t imagine not remembering doing that to my ring.
why? because they aren''t saying what you want to hear?Date: 2/28/2006 7:31:46 PM
Author: mrssalvo
I guess I personlly would not be satified with Wf''s or their outside sources conclusions.
Sweetie, what sort of learning experience are you hoping for? Do you think that even DL has a clue what caused the impact? OBVIOUSLY NOT from her numerous posts. So what makes you think that a bunch of girls on a forum are going to figure it out? Seriously!!!!Date: 2/28/2006 7:56:00 PM
Author: Princess V
Wow DL I am really sorry that this happened but I am glad WF is remaking it!![]()
Here''s what concerns me about pave rings and vendors (not just WF, when I wanted to get my e-ring reset I called several different PS vendors and alot of them gave me the same type of warning). Engagement rings are supposed to be made to be worn for a lifetime. Even though these settings are delicate, they are supposed to be able to be worn everyday. I''d like to think that I am pretty careful with my ring, I don''t wear it to workout or when I''m cooking or in the shower or sleeping. Yet, I still (just in 2 weeks) have banged my ring twice that I can think of. Once was against a sink and boy, did it hurt my hand! I definitely examined the ring really well after. I just think that if something happened to DL''s ring even without her wearing it she would have had to notice it somehow. I mean the idea of a ring sitting on a vanity table and something falling on it that''s able to break is pretty weird.Even someone stepping on a ring shouldn''t break it.![]()
I guess I''m wondering what caused this because I''d like to know how and when to avoid something like this happening to my ring and I think that this should a learning experience for us here at PS instead of saying that we shouldn''t question WF or get to the bottom of this. It''s not that I''m questioning WF as a company I don''t really think anyone is. I''d just like to know what ''impact'' it was that caused the breakage to the ring.![]()
Date: 2/28/2006 7:49:10 PM
Author: Mara
'
WF is a respected company, basically you are saying you don't trust them OR that you think they are lying. What is the deal?
No need to get condescending.Date: 2/28/2006 8:01:56 PM
Author: Mara
Sweetie, what sort of learning experience are you hoping for? Do you think that even DL has a clue what caused the impact? OBVIOUSLY NOT from her numerous posts. So what makes you think that a bunch of girls on a forum are going to figure it out? Seriously!!!!Date: 2/28/2006 7:56:00 PM
Author: Princess V
Wow DL I am really sorry that this happened but I am glad WF is remaking it!![]()
Here''s what concerns me about pave rings and vendors (not just WF, when I wanted to get my e-ring reset I called several different PS vendors and alot of them gave me the same type of warning). Engagement rings are supposed to be made to be worn for a lifetime. Even though these settings are delicate, they are supposed to be able to be worn everyday. I''d like to think that I am pretty careful with my ring, I don''t wear it to workout or when I''m cooking or in the shower or sleeping. Yet, I still (just in 2 weeks) have banged my ring twice that I can think of. Once was against a sink and boy, did it hurt my hand! I definitely examined the ring really well after. I just think that if something happened to DL''s ring even without her wearing it she would have had to notice it somehow. I mean the idea of a ring sitting on a vanity table and something falling on it that''s able to break is pretty weird.Even someone stepping on a ring shouldn''t break it.![]()
I guess I''m wondering what caused this because I''d like to know how and when to avoid something like this happening to my ring and I think that this should a learning experience for us here at PS instead of saying that we shouldn''t question WF or get to the bottom of this. It''s not that I''m questioning WF as a company I don''t really think anyone is. I''d just like to know what ''impact'' it was that caused the breakage to the ring.![]()
Surely we''d ALL love to know what happened so that we could ALL make sure NOT TO DO IT right? I surely don''t want to have to remake my ring. But do you really see any sort of epiphany or lightbulb going off happening here? NO. Instead it''s all just ''well maybe XYZ ate it and then it somehow made it to China and back again''. Even my vacuum scenario was ridiculous but I guess it coulda happened.
So in reality we are not going to find out what happened do it. Can we all somehow just manage to live with it? I surely hope so.
AbsolutelyDate: 2/28/2006 7:36:54 PM
Author: mrssalvo
rascal,
I agree, we don''t know, but i''m am still allowed to have my very unpopular opinion![]()
Hard to believe it....but I wasn''t being condescending! I was being HONEST. We''re not going to figure it out here which is unfortunate but true. If you want experts to chime in re: what not to do, start a new post.Date: 2/28/2006 8:07:56 PM
Author: Princess V
No need to get condescending.Date: 2/28/2006 8:01:56 PM
Author: Mara
Sweetie, what sort of learning experience are you hoping for? Do you think that even DL has a clue what caused the impact? OBVIOUSLY NOT from her numerous posts. So what makes you think that a bunch of girls on a forum are going to figure it out? Seriously!!!!Date: 2/28/2006 7:56:00 PM
Author: Princess V
Wow DL I am really sorry that this happened but I am glad WF is remaking it!![]()
Here''s what concerns me about pave rings and vendors (not just WF, when I wanted to get my e-ring reset I called several different PS vendors and alot of them gave me the same type of warning). Engagement rings are supposed to be made to be worn for a lifetime. Even though these settings are delicate, they are supposed to be able to be worn everyday. I''d like to think that I am pretty careful with my ring, I don''t wear it to workout or when I''m cooking or in the shower or sleeping. Yet, I still (just in 2 weeks) have banged my ring twice that I can think of. Once was against a sink and boy, did it hurt my hand! I definitely examined the ring really well after. I just think that if something happened to DL''s ring even without her wearing it she would have had to notice it somehow. I mean the idea of a ring sitting on a vanity table and something falling on it that''s able to break is pretty weird.Even someone stepping on a ring shouldn''t break it.![]()
I guess I''m wondering what caused this because I''d like to know how and when to avoid something like this happening to my ring and I think that this should a learning experience for us here at PS instead of saying that we shouldn''t question WF or get to the bottom of this. It''s not that I''m questioning WF as a company I don''t really think anyone is. I''d just like to know what ''impact'' it was that caused the breakage to the ring.![]()
Surely we''d ALL love to know what happened so that we could ALL make sure NOT TO DO IT right? I surely don''t want to have to remake my ring. But do you really see any sort of epiphany or lightbulb going off happening here? NO. Instead it''s all just ''well maybe XYZ ate it and then it somehow made it to China and back again''. Even my vacuum scenario was ridiculous but I guess it coulda happened.
So in reality we are not going to find out what happened do it. Can we all somehow just manage to live with it? I surely hope so.I meant some input from maybe WF and other jewelers what would cause an impact like that to break a ring. In case, I didn''t make myself clear enough I''m asking 1) how much of an impact is required and 2) some examples where the cause was known.![]()
Now before anyone says ''Duh, alot of impact'' thats not the answer I''m looking for.
I honestly don't think there's a way to determine that now. Whatever caused it happened with no witnesses, and anything else is really speculative and wouldn't really be meaningful. Without an eyewitness, there is no way to know now what caused it.I'd just like to know what 'impact' it was that caused the breakage to the ring.![]()
Yes, e-rings are meant to be worn every day, but they aren't meant to be indestructible. Even with normal, non-impactful, daily wear, they will require maintenance over a lifetime. My mom took her ring to be cleaned and checked.....it was nearly 35 years old. The bench jeweler marveled at how well her ring had held up considering it was the original workmanship. He noted that most rings need a head rework every 10 years or so. He said it was a testament to the workmanship that it had lasted that long, but that it was very unusual. Instead of doing a whole head replacement, he just rebuilt the eroded area of the head.Here's what concerns me about pave rings and vendors (not just WF, when I wanted to get my e-ring reset I called several different PS vendors and alot of them gave me the same type of warning). Engagement rings are supposed to be made to be worn for a lifetime. Even though these settings are delicate, they are supposed to be able to be worn everyday.
actually, we are a group of happy customers and it is for exactly the reason you listed...they are human. yes, they may make mistakes but what sets them apart is that they will bend over backwards to make things right.Date: 2/28/2006 8:24:29 PM
Author: Kimberly
Woa everyone is entitled to their opinion. Questioning things is not rude. It is natural to want clear answers.
I know you WF groupies think they can do no wrong but that is not true. I am so glad you all love them so but they are a business run by humans.
Everyone screws up. WF opinion is inherently bias. They have a stake at protecting their OWN reputation and even more so because we are all talking about the broken ring. Thus the word would get out that there was a flaw in their work!
There is no harm discussing both sides of the issue. After all we all love our jewerly and don't want this to happen to any of our pieces.
When reading these boards and responding we all come in with a level of bias. Some have more 'the venders' and some hopefully less 'the appraisors' and the rest of us probably lie in the middle.
I believe the poster that she did nothing to damage her ring. She seems very reasonable and open to admit wrong doing if indeed she did wrong-In fact she did in the title of this post. I believe there is a chance other factors strongly contributed to the ring breaking. Factors either inherent in the design as Mara pointed out or bad workmanship.
We probably will never know.