shape
carat
color
clarity

Advice on choosing a lab grown diamond

DejaWiz

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Apr 23, 2021
Messages
5,988
OK, I'll do that! After seeing both diamonds in real life videos, did you notice any differences in performance/color or would prefer one over the other?

They look darn near identical in the videos...I would not be able to definitively say which was which if you hadn't started so.

Can they get you ASET images and maybe H&A scope pics?
 

Kim N

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Oct 6, 2005
Messages
6,463
OK, I'll do that! After seeing both diamonds in real life videos, did you notice any differences in performance/color or would prefer one over the other?

I didn't notice any differences, so I'd still pick the 1.75 for the better clarity.

They look darn near identical in the videos...I would not be able to definitively say which was which if you hadn't started so.

Can they get you ASET images and maybe H&A scope pics?

DejaWiz, I'm curious if you don't trust the H&A and light scope photos that GCAL provides?
 

sheezacowgurl

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 5, 2022
Messages
81
They look darn near identical in the videos...I would not be able to definitively say which was which if you hadn't started so.

Can they get you ASET images and maybe H&A scope pics?

She sent me over the ASET and SCOPE images along with additional photos, video, and comparison photos of the two on the white tray in brighter lighting! I swear I can still see the 1.75 looks more steely and the 1.68 more warm. Maybe this is normal and one is preferred over the other and I'd never tell the difference on my hand in a setting. Would you agree the 1.75 ASET image is a deeper red than the 1.68? I've been doing a lot of reading on here, trying to learn and read some others felt their diamonds "went dark" in certain lighting like the car. They tried another diamond and it didn't do that. Is this normal or is this a lab grown diamond characteristic and you just have to find one that doesn't go dark?

1.75
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1z9XfvzfMubfMSr-THigF-t2YQLkeF4Zq/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1z7e8NyrH5xEO7kBY2LAMBVUfFJI4UzOO/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1z-XRASvyrWemIvXy_JLK3CCmfrNJu4Vv/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1z-ME2hGIvdPQKg3vl7BEyvNO6Z2vAggk/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yzfsvP7fYNaaio43uOa7yL28SMtKZsSK/view?usp=share_link I feel like it starts out dark/almost green hue here and then gets whiter/brighter as she walks through different lighting. Is this "darkness" normal behavior?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ywXy0bAp5eptcWhjXJfJxwyOV06fHG2a/view?usp=share_link

1.75 scope images
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-93xGutUAZezG1xLBtICkRC0gWNSVQBo/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-LeCqNp_yd7SxUGMTZmWuk8MxQsjHeGS/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-Ly2Bg8ZDBj4kyLf198PpOob07X6wzch/view?usp=share_link

1.68 on left and 1.75 on right
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-6OxESEPQrP-f3_srb9fBl0Z6fux-BV9/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-0eb_o-xlmfms78oGzYOJt1ZYdrG_rMZ/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/19CDY8a99bjFoz5ORch42xe4S2gMKXrqY/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zwexf0svz9I3qKxMZDMyD-s4u03NMrYj/view?usp=share_link

1.68 scope
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-Fl7Xit6GyaWc00m1pFHIQyVtA7OZyCN/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-aVx0Mrj7DoZR4xPMqmde9OvqKes0VHq/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-T06jM9_2ID-_k5Jo5c9SMkYpILthoh4/view?usp=share_link
 

DejaWiz

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Apr 23, 2021
Messages
5,988
She sent me over the ASET and SCOPE images along with additional photos, video, and comparison photos of the two on the white tray in brighter lighting! I swear I can still see the 1.75 looks more steely and the 1.68 more warm. Maybe this is normal and one is preferred over the other and I'd never tell the difference on my hand in a setting. Would you agree the 1.75 ASET image is a deeper red than the 1.68? I've been doing a lot of reading on here, trying to learn and read some others felt their diamonds "went dark" in certain lighting like the car. They tried another diamond and it didn't do that. Is this normal or is this a lab grown diamond characteristic and you just have to find one that doesn't go dark?

1.75
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1z9XfvzfMubfMSr-THigF-t2YQLkeF4Zq/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1z7e8NyrH5xEO7kBY2LAMBVUfFJI4UzOO/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1z-XRASvyrWemIvXy_JLK3CCmfrNJu4Vv/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1z-ME2hGIvdPQKg3vl7BEyvNO6Z2vAggk/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yzfsvP7fYNaaio43uOa7yL28SMtKZsSK/view?usp=share_link I feel like it starts out dark/almost green hue here and then gets whiter/brighter as she walks through different lighting. Is this "darkness" normal behavior?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ywXy0bAp5eptcWhjXJfJxwyOV06fHG2a/view?usp=share_link

1.75 scope images
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-93xGutUAZezG1xLBtICkRC0gWNSVQBo/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-LeCqNp_yd7SxUGMTZmWuk8MxQsjHeGS/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-Ly2Bg8ZDBj4kyLf198PpOob07X6wzch/view?usp=share_link

1.68 on left and 1.75 on right
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-6OxESEPQrP-f3_srb9fBl0Z6fux-BV9/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-0eb_o-xlmfms78oGzYOJt1ZYdrG_rMZ/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/19CDY8a99bjFoz5ORch42xe4S2gMKXrqY/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zwexf0svz9I3qKxMZDMyD-s4u03NMrYj/view?usp=share_link

1.68 scope
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-Fl7Xit6GyaWc00m1pFHIQyVtA7OZyCN/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-aVx0Mrj7DoZR4xPMqmde9OvqKes0VHq/view?usp=share_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-T06jM9_2ID-_k5Jo5c9SMkYpILthoh4/view?usp=share_link

Both look great under the scopes.
The 1.75 certainly doesn't appear as a Type IIb since I can see the usual yellowish hue out near the edges of the crown (since boron makes the diamond absorb yellow to appear faintly blue, this wouldn't be prevalent).

I think the 1.75 is the winner.

Kim N I do trust the GCAL images, but the more, the merrier!
What do you think about any potential hue, Kim?
Especially looking at this picture...yellowish from the diamond or environmental?

 

sheezacowgurl

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 5, 2022
Messages
81
Thank u both so much. I was really surprised how many videos and pictures she sent over. Super prompt too! I think we agree the 1.75 is the winner. Would you say it’s worth $249 more than the 1.68? I know it’s a better clarity and has a better crown height, but would u be able to tell the 1.75 is better in person once set? I hate to overspend if you could never tell the difference lol.
 

DejaWiz

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Apr 23, 2021
Messages
5,988
Thank u both so much. I was really surprised how many videos and pictures she sent over. Super prompt too! I think we agree the 1.75 is the winner. Would you say it’s worth $249 more than the 1.68? I know it’s a better clarity and has a better crown height, but would u be able to tell the 1.75 is better in person once set? I hate to overspend if you could never tell the difference lol.

To get an HPHT Type IIa, yes totally worth it to me, at least.
 

sheezacowgurl

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 5, 2022
Messages
81
To get an HPHT Type IIa, yes totally worth it to me, at least.

Just looked at both the 1.68 and 1.75 gcal certs again and they both say HPHT type II. I thought they were the same! I guess u can tell the 1.68 isn’t type IIa by the photos and videos?
 
Last edited:

DejaWiz

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Apr 23, 2021
Messages
5,988
Just looked at both the 1.68 and 1.75 gcal certs again and they both say HPHT type II. I thought they were the same! I guess u can tell the 1.68 isn’t type IIa by the photos and videos?

My apology..mi thought the 1.68 was a CVD.

In this case...if you are more comfortable with the 1.68, then definitely go for it. They both look gorgeous and perform amazingly.
 

Kim N

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Oct 6, 2005
Messages
6,463
Both look great under the scopes.
The 1.75 certainly doesn't appear as a Type IIb since I can see the usual yellowish hue out near the edges of the crown (since boron makes the diamond absorb yellow to appear faintly blue, this wouldn't be prevalent).

I think the 1.75 is the winner.

Kim N I do trust the GCAL images, but the more, the merrier!
What do you think about any potential hue, Kim?
Especially looking at this picture...yellowish from the diamond or environmental?


I really think it's from the diamond itself, so I stand by my no-blue-nuance opinion.

Thank u both so much. I was really surprised how many videos and pictures she sent over. Super prompt too! I think we agree the 1.75 is the winner. Would you say it’s worth $249 more than the 1.68? I know it’s a better clarity and has a better crown height, but would u be able to tell the 1.75 is better in person once set? I hate to overspend if you could never tell the difference lol.

I agree with DejaWiz, get the one you're more comfortable with. I would pick the 1.75 if it were for me.
 

DejaWiz

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Apr 23, 2021
Messages
5,988
I really think it's from the diamond itself, so I stand by my no-blue-nuance opinion.



I agree with DejaWiz, get the one you're more comfortable with. I would pick the 1.75 if it were for me.

Thank you again, Kim N...much appreciated!
 

sheezacowgurl

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 5, 2022
Messages
81
Hi! So I was all set on the 1.75 and then I showed my husband all the videos and he made a few observations. He thinks the 1.68 sparkles more/has bigger flashes than the 1.75 in the videos where only one diamond is on the lady's hand and in the tweezer videos. Do you think the 1.68 may appear to sparkle more in the videos by itself and tweezer video because maybe it was under a different light or angle than when the 1.75 was videoed? He thinks the 1.75 is darker when she bends her hand and you can see a side view (I wonder if there is something dark that the 1.75 diamond is closest to and it's picking that up). Also in the photos on the white tray he says it looks like the 1.68 lights up more and is clearer. I just want to feel good about it and explain to him what he’s seeing I guess. Can u give any advice/info on this?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zwexf0svz9I3qKxMZDMyD-s4u03NMrYj/view?usp=share_link here's the photo where is thinks the 1.75 on the right is dull/not as clear.
I picked the 1.75 due to better clarity. Do you think you can tell the difference in clarity or see the inclusions on the 1.68 vs2 to the naked eye in person?
Thanks in advance!
 

Kim N

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Oct 6, 2005
Messages
6,463
Hi! So I was all set on the 1.75 and then I showed my husband all the videos and he made a few observations. He thinks the 1.68 sparkles more/has bigger flashes than the 1.75 in the videos where only one diamond is on the lady's hand and in the tweezer videos. Do you think the 1.68 may appear to sparkle more in the videos by itself and tweezer video because maybe it was under a different light or angle than when the 1.75 was videoed? He thinks the 1.75 is darker when she bends her hand and you can see a side view (I wonder if there is something dark that the 1.75 diamond is closest to and it's picking that up). Also in the photos on the white tray he says it looks like the 1.68 lights up more and is clearer. I just want to feel good about it and explain to him what he’s seeing I guess. Can u give any advice/info on this?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zwexf0svz9I3qKxMZDMyD-s4u03NMrYj/view?usp=share_link here's the photo where is thinks the 1.75 on the right is dull/not as clear.
I picked the 1.75 due to better clarity. Do you think you can tell the difference in clarity or see the inclusions on the 1.68 vs2 to the naked eye in person?
Thanks in advance!

I really think they perform very similarly. In daily viewing and perhaps even under scrutiny, you wouldn't see the inclusions on the 1.68. It sounds like you'd be more comfortable with the 1.68, and it's a bit cheaper so win/win. You can always return it if the inclusions end up being an issue.
 

sheezacowgurl

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 5, 2022
Messages
81
I really think they perform very similarly. In daily viewing and perhaps even under scrutiny, you wouldn't see the inclusions on the 1.68. It sounds like you'd be more comfortable with the 1.68, and it's a bit cheaper so win/win. You can always return it if the inclusions end up being an issue.

Thank you @Kim N ! In my head, I feel like the 1.75 is the "better" diamond according to the specs (VS1 and having the slightly taller crown height) but I guess you're right when picking one you should go off how it looks in person. The only thing bugging me is how they look different when viewing from the side. I attached the screenshots we took when viewing the videos when my husband said how the bottom one looks dark/grey compared to the top one. When choosing is it better to get the diamond that looks more like the top or bottom? Forgive me as I'm not entirely sure how a good diamond should react at different viewing angles lol. I just notice the difference. Bottom is the 1.75

IMG_9720.jpeg IMG_9720.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9719.jpeg
    IMG_9719.jpeg
    33.7 KB · Views: 21

Kim N

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Oct 6, 2005
Messages
6,463
Thank you @Kim N ! In my head, I feel like the 1.75 is the "better" diamond according to the specs (VS1 and having the slightly taller crown height) but I guess you're right when picking one you should go off how it looks in person. The only thing bugging me is how they look different when viewing from the side. I attached the screenshots we took when viewing the videos when my husband said how the bottom one looks dark/grey compared to the top one. When choosing is it better to get the diamond that looks more like the top or bottom? Forgive me as I'm not entirely sure how a good diamond should react at different viewing angles lol. I just notice the difference. Bottom is the 1.75

IMG_9720.jpeg IMG_9720.jpeg

That's very strange that the 1.75 is appearing noticeably darker in these photos. I would definitely go with the 1.68 in this case.
 

DejaWiz

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Apr 23, 2021
Messages
5,988
Thank you @Kim N ! In my head, I feel like the 1.75 is the "better" diamond according to the specs (VS1 and having the slightly taller crown height) but I guess you're right when picking one you should go off how it looks in person. The only thing bugging me is how they look different when viewing from the side. I attached the screenshots we took when viewing the videos when my husband said how the bottom one looks dark/grey compared to the top one. When choosing is it better to get the diamond that looks more like the top or bottom? Forgive me as I'm not entirely sure how a good diamond should react at different viewing angles lol. I just notice the difference. Bottom is the 1.75

IMG_9720.jpeg IMG_9720.jpeg

I'm thinking that has to be some kind of environmental reflection going on there.
 

sheezacowgurl

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 5, 2022
Messages
81
I'm thinking that has to be some kind of environmental reflection going on there.

What’s odd is we can see it’s darker in both videos where she has both diamonds on her finger together. We don’t notice it in the videos where it’s just one diamond by itself. Not sure if it’s because we don’t have the other stone right next to it to compare to or if it’s environmental like u said. She said it’s just depth of field of the camera - things closer will be in focus, the further out its blurred / not as contrasted.
 

DejaWiz

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Apr 23, 2021
Messages
5,988
What’s odd is we can see it’s darker in both videos where she has both diamonds on her finger together. We don’t notice it in the videos where it’s just one diamond by itself. Not sure if it’s because we don’t have the other stone right next to it to compare to or if it’s environmental like u said. She said it’s just depth of field of the camera - things closer will be in focus, the further out its blurred / not as contrasted.

I would lean towards agreeing with her. :)
 

sheezacowgurl

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 5, 2022
Messages
81
Hi! She sent me over these to take a look at to compare to. What do you all think of these in comparison to the other two?
 

Kim N

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Oct 6, 2005
Messages
6,463
Hi! She sent me over these to take a look at to compare to. What do you all think of these in comparison to the other two?

The E may have some subtle blue nuance. The F is pretty nice, but I prefer the other two stones.
 

sheezacowgurl

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 5, 2022
Messages
81
The E may have some subtle blue nuance. The F is pretty nice, but I prefer the other two stones.

Yes, I decided no on the E for the possible slight blue in the video. The 2ct came in and it looks VERY different to me color wise than the video that was online. Crazy it's the same diamond!
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NoGXZ27tZKENmgeOXZv4O40oTPlWA9LA/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NkDnzHHxRxaRYVmdb1d_GinsqWLRyopP/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Nva1-INT1ZV0WaqA9KAiOUOCfchvBxx6/view?usp=sharing

unfortunately, they don't have all three together to view side by side, but they are still all available to purchase. I think it was helpful to at least see another option. Now to decide! I don't understand pricing how you can get a higher carat and clarity for less money? Seems too good to be true.
 

DejaWiz

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Apr 23, 2021
Messages
5,988
Yes, I decided no on the E for the possible slight blue in the video. The 2ct came in and it looks VERY different to me color wise than the video that was online. Crazy it's the same diamond!
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NoGXZ27tZKENmgeOXZv4O40oTPlWA9LA/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NkDnzHHxRxaRYVmdb1d_GinsqWLRyopP/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Nva1-INT1ZV0WaqA9KAiOUOCfchvBxx6/view?usp=sharing

unfortunately, they don't have all three together to view side by side, but they are still all available to purchase. I think it was helpful to at least see another option. Now to decide! I don't understand pricing how you can get a higher carat and clarity for less money? Seems too good to be true.

Looks darned great!

Vendor pricing plays a huge role in the seller determining their retail pricing, so take advantage of that if you want.
 

sheezacowgurl

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 5, 2022
Messages
81
Looks darned great!

Vendor pricing plays a huge role in the seller determining their retail pricing, so take advantage of that if you want.
Here's another one with different lighting


I do think it looks good! She said it's the warmest F she has ever seen. Do you agree with that? I really wanted to stick with GCAL 8X just because of all the testing and the diamond's performance is proven, but I guess if the specs on the IGI certificate are good, this one will perform just as good as the GCAL diamonds?
 
Last edited:

DejaWiz

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Apr 23, 2021
Messages
5,988
Here's another one with different lighting


I do think it looks good! She said it's the warmest F she has ever seen. Do you agree with that? I really wanted to stick with GCAL 8X just because of all the testing and the diamond's performance is proven, but I guess if the specs on the IGI certificate are good, this one will perform just as good as the GCAL diamonds?

Definitely get ASET images...Frank Darling will certainly provide those.

Do you have the grading report numbers for the diamonds on your frontrunner list?
 

sheezacowgurl

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 5, 2022
Messages
81
Definitely get ASET images...Frank Darling will certainly provide those.

Do you have the grading report numbers for the diamonds on your frontrunner list?

This one is IGI LG 550225367
The other two are GCAL LG 313471144 and LG 313160774.
 

DejaWiz

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Apr 23, 2021
Messages
5,988
Thank you kindly

2.07 F VVS2 (HPHT) - 40.8/34.3/57.5 - 8.23mm

1.75 F VS1 (HPHT) - 40.8/34.5/57 - 7.77mm

1.68 F VS2 (HPHT) - 40.8/34/57 - 7.72mm

If the price is right and the very slight increase of warmth won't bother your eyes, then I think the noticeably bigger diameter/spread of the 2.07 would be a fine choice, if the ASET scope image shakes out.
 

sheezacowgurl

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 5, 2022
Messages
81
Thank you kindly

2.07 F VVS2 (HPHT) - 40.8/34.3/57.5 - 8.23mm

1.75 F VS1 (HPHT) - 40.8/34.5/57 - 7.77mm

1.68 F VS2 (HPHT) - 40.8/34/57 - 7.72mm

If the price is right and the very slight increase of warmth won't bother your eyes, then I think the noticeably bigger diameter/spread of the 2.07 would be a fine choice, if the ASET scope image shakes out.

Thanks! I requested the images. That was the only thing I was questioning was it being warmer and she even said it’s the warmest F she’s ever seen, but all three are graded as a F. Maybe if this one was graded by gcal like the other two it wouldn’t be a F ‍♀️
 

DejaWiz

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Apr 23, 2021
Messages
5,988
Thanks! I requested the images. That was the only thing I was questioning was it being warmer and she even said it’s the warmest F she’s ever seen, but all three are graded as a F. Maybe if this one was graded by gcal like the other two it wouldn’t be a F ‍♀️

Quite possible...but grading is opinion based by differing sets of eyes. They all do their best to be as consistent as possible from one diamond to the next that passes through any given lab, but the human element is still a factor. Automated color grading will continue to expand and spread across all of the major labs, eventually. Hopefully.

How does the 2.07 price compare to diamonds of G color at similar carat weight, cut quality, and clarity? If you feel that it should be a G, then see if it compares in price to G.
 

Kim N

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Oct 6, 2005
Messages
6,463
Thanks! I requested the images. That was the only thing I was questioning was it being warmer and she even said it’s the warmest F she’s ever seen, but all three are graded as a F. Maybe if this one was graded by gcal like the other two it wouldn’t be a F ‍♀️

Can you share the prices of the three? For the larger size and less money, I'm inclined to go for the 2.07.
 

sheezacowgurl

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 5, 2022
Messages
81
Quite possible...but grading is opinion based by differing sets of eyes. They all do their best to be as consistent as possible from one diamond to the next that passes through any given lab, but the human element is still a factor. Automated color grading will continue to expand and spread across all of the major labs, eventually. Hopefully.

How does the 2.07 price compare to diamonds of G color at similar carat weight, cut quality, and clarity? If you feel that it should be a G, then see if it compares in price to G.

That's a good idea. I know when I looked before there were hardly any HPHT in F, so that's probably the same for G, but doesn't hurt to look again. I just hope this warmer looking F won't look too yellow in a platinum setting. She said it definitely doesn't show any blue to it like I was concerned about with the D I had, so that's good!
 

sheezacowgurl

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 5, 2022
Messages
81
Can you share the prices of the three? For the larger size and less money, I'm inclined to go for the 2.07.

1.68 $2336
1.75 $2714, but they will honor the $2585 price they had originally
2.07 $2641
So even though the 1.75 is priced higher, with the honored price it's only $56 less than the 2.07 that is bigger and a higher clarity. This is why I was saying is it too good to be true/maybe the 2.07 came from a lower quality rough material or something?
 
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top