Mico
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2012
- Messages
- 1,245
Mico|1364589363|3416216 said:Oh. My. Gosh. BEAUTIFUL! Will you keep it?
+1CharmyPoo|1364596957|3416294 said:I really think this is a lovely AVR. I have not been a fan of the older AVRs but Jon has been doing a great job in his tweaks. I really much prefer the new ones over the originals.
I agree with this. I think if you go back down you will regret it and might long for this size point again. I hope that having it in person to see in your lighting conditions and whatnot you'll know for sure if its THE ONE for you. I think it's a winner, and hopefully the color really is a winner for you. It looks fantastic.MissGotRocks|1364600305|3416312 said:Very, very beautiful stone! I think the size is perfect on you and if you go back down to the 1.7, I fear you'll regret it after having seen this one! It's big and beautiful but not too showy or ostentatious. I hope you'll go with it if you love it - obviously your friends know at this point that you're a diamond lover so. . . don't let them influence your decision. Bet they'll be just as happy for you as we are!
Dreamer's comparison shots are really helpful! I love the faceting under the table on this one so much better - seems more scattered or random unlike the flower petal effect in the other stone. I SO much prefer this faceting! Gorgeous!
If you need me to, I'll call Jon and tell him it won't be coming back! (Or only for setting!)![]()
![]()
diamondseeker2006|1364610912|3416446 said:Ariel...thank you! I do think this cut is better after seeing this one!!! And yes, I would never, ever get DSS!
Owies Nana|1364612200|3416462 said:diamondseeker2006|1364610912|3416446 said:Ariel...thank you! I do think this cut is better after seeing this one!!! And yes, I would never, ever get DSS!
DS, don't EVER say "never".....![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
ame|1364612938|3416480 said:Ohhh that will look awesome in your Vatche with your Legacy band... SWOON. I say go for it. Bec even if after it's set you change your mind, you know you like the size, and you can look in that same range. But I think you found your "one."
Dreamer_D|1364587393|3416193 said:diamondseeker2006|1364586849|3416184 said:Laila and Sharon...thank you!!! I really value your opinions!
And it doesn't bother me a bit if someone says they wouldn't choose it and why! I have been looking since last August, I think, so I am obviously not going to make a rushed decision!
GOG has a long return policy right? Can you hang onto this one and then when the 1.7 H is ready ,have it sent out too so you can compare? I mean, that would cross all the Ts and then you would never have the "what if" in your mind. Is the H being cut or is it being graded? I would be tempted to see it even if it did not have a report quite yet...
ame|1364617795|3416532 said:That's a pretty logical way to look at it! If you can seriously easily reuse it, it's beautiful, you know it works with your band, and the styles will be so complementary!!
I can absolutely commiserate with the "I just wanna be DONE" part of that. Mine went on for THREE YEARS...ugh! But the stone I guess was easy, that was only a few months, at most, and I was so relieved I got this stone fairly easily, it turned out to be perfect, and was worth the rejections before it. I am glad though that we went up to see it compared to even more, and that I saw AVCs, AVRs, and a few other cuts in person like Octavias, just so I could make 100% sure, since this one is mine for a damn long time!!! And I am not even ready for the reset despite needing to get that started, thankfully my wedding band drama is all done for now.
Just do not SETTLE for this to be done with it. Make sure you REALLY love this stone and it's quirks and personality and performance before you set it.
ruby59|1364587503|3416194 said:I have been looking at oec's and now am beginning to understand what a really nice one is supposed to look like - and yours is it. Looks amazing.
Okay just to clarify... I didn't mean non-symmetrical in a bad way at all... I'm not even sure if that's the word I wanted to use. The older AVRs with the circle-y petals just look so much more 'perfect' but this just looks more real. Anyway, love it. Diamond twins! Only mine is a little baby sister of your diamond. A lot littler.diamondseeker2006|1364596224|3416289 said:hearts-arrows girl..thank you!!!
bastecat....I really, really, really appreciate it!!!![]()
lin_ny...gosh, when I saw your avatar picture, I thought it looked exactly like my diamond!So I guess it does look like an old OEC for sure!!! It actually is perfectly symmetrical face-on, but a lot of my pictures aren't straight on because it doesn't sit straight in the ring holder! But diamonds need to look good at all angles, that is for sure! Thanks!
junebug...I appreciate opinions on size and everything else, so do not apologize!!! I had actually ordered an 8mm cz to determine my size limit, and that was what I had decided. So I honestly suprised myself that I would consider this one, although it is just over 8mm! Oh, great that your table is the same size! That was new to me as the others I saw had larger ones..but I do love it!
ame...hey! I am sooo glad you like it! I am glad I didn't settle for one of the earlier ones..better to wait for the right one!
canuk-gal|1364587733|3416198 said:HI:
Difficult decisions since you value color. I get that, truly.
There are so many desirable qualities in this larger stone. Nicely cut. Nothing OTT in terms of size--looks very well on your hand. I color is great--even desirable. If there is body color--I cannot percept it.
I think it might be difficult to "send" it back......![]()
cheers--Shaorn
lin_ny|1364618669|3416542 said:Okay just to clarify... I didn't mean non-symmetrical in a bad way at all... I'm not even sure if that's the word I wanted to use. The older AVRs with the circle-y petals just look so much more 'perfect' but this just looks more real. Anyway, love it. Diamond twins! Only mine is a little baby sister of your diamond. A lot littler.![]()