iota15
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2010
- Messages
- 1,278
Black Jade|1300806825|2877288 said:Umm,read up on history. In the first part of the 20th century, women did all of these things, including run for President.
No offense, but I do wonder why it is that so many women think that women's lives were completely narrow and restricted before 1970's feminism. Most women nowadays would not last a day handling all the responsibilities that their grandmothers and great-grandmothers, sometimes at home and sometimes out of the house. We need to respect these forbears a bit more.
Also, the engagement ring tradition never had anything to do with 'a promise from the male to the female that she'll never have to worry her pretty little head about the big bad world." It actually started to really become widespread force in the period of the 1920's when a lot of women moved away from the father's house before they got married and didn't live in the old communities anymore where social pressure (everyone knew everyone else) made sure that a man could not trash them and get away scot free. In the old days, fathers, brothers and neighbors would take care of such a guy. In the world of the 20's, the working woman living in the cities got a ring so that she had SOMETHING valuable that could be turned into cash her fiance (who now was probably someone she hadn't known all her life) turned out to be a bigamist, or a deadbeat or just not serious. OR, for if they actually got married and he would not/could not support her once there were children. The people of the time faced the fact that women get pregnant and that's its rather hard to work to support a family in the third trimester, even if its not a problem pregnancy. Also that its hard to work with little children. there were social services (pre-Franklin Roosevelt) and this tradition was meant to help the woman, not to be oppressive.
Rings back then weren't in all the different styles there are now (they weren't even when I got married in 1983), so choosing was not the super important thing it has become now that rings are (to be honest) very commercialized, with ads directed to women way before they get married, subject to changes of fashion that are really quick, and also seen as status symbols as well as symbols of love and commitement. So women didn't have a lot of investment in picking an exact ring out for themselves. A lot of women like to do this now. Other women still don't. Women on this board are likely to want to be choosers and even (sometimes) partial payers, which I don't have a problem with (my fiance took me along with him to choose mine, because he wanted to be sure I was satisfied, because I'm a jewelry person).
I think what the OP found strange is that, having chosen the ring, seen the ring and maybe even paid for the ring, there is this elaborate pretense that it's a surprise, when actually its lying in a box in a drawer of the house where the woman lives with the man already (and has usually for years). But I think he doesn't understand this because he is a man. Whatever you think of modern mores (that's not the subject of this post), women are still women and they want romance surrounding their wedding and for everything to seem new and fresh, probably especially if it isn't. I would think that if you had picked out the ring, the 'surprise' proposal that was very romantic in the place chosen and the way he did it proposal would be especially important because you would want the man to show he cared by taking the some trouble about SOMETHING. Isn't that the definition of romance after all? For the guy to do something that gets him up off the couch which causes him trouble and expense just for you, just because you WANT it? Whether it's killing an actual dragon, facing a scary father to ask for his daughter's hand (as used to done), or arranging a trip to Venice with rose petals falling into a gondola to make it special that he's giving you the ring that you picked?
Wow. Brava, Black Jade!
I've never put romance in those terms (bolded above) but I sure will now.