shape
carat
color
clarity

What are the perfect proportions for a three-stone ring?

What size side diamaonds for a 1.20ct center?

  • 0.60ct each

    Votes: 1 100.0%
  • show me the answers!

    Votes: 1 100.0%
  • 0.50ct each

    Votes: 1 100.0%

  • Total voters
    1
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
what about color side stones?
 
Date: 12/7/2009 5:30:01 PM
Author: Laila619
To me, the bigger side diamonds just look like one big blur/row of diamond. The smaller sidestones let the center stone shine.
I agree but I guess it depends on the look you''re going for. I don''t see the point in having a lovely centre stone if you''re going to crowd it with diamonds just to say ''look at my bling''. Like I said, matter of personal opinion....
 
I think it depends on what kind of ring are you trying to build. If you are building a ring around your centre stone, ie. a stone with two side stones, then I would go with the smaller stones (.2 or .3). If you are going for a three stone, I would go with the 2:1 ratio, or even just a smidgen smaller so from .5 to .6. In summary, if this was an engagment ring I would go with the .3''s or so, but for a RHR the .5 or so. Make sense?
 
Date: 12/7/2009 5:30:01 PM
Author: Laila619
To me, the bigger side diamonds just look like one big blur/row of diamond. The smaller sidestones let the center stone shine.
I agree with this. As others have said, it depends on what look you''re going for, & that the larger sidestones are more anniversary-ish, while the smaller ones are more e-ring-ish, etc... , but as for me, I''m with those who say go with the smaller sidestones. e.g. MissGotRocks'' ring - I think her sidestones are beautiful & plenty big enough to accent her large center stone.

I so agree w/ Laila that with the bigger sides, you get one big blur/row of diamond, although of course many might think that not a bad thing!
2.gif
But for me, if I want a blur/row of diamond, I''d rather get a ring that is indeed just a row of equal-size diamonds. Why have a large center stone if it''s not going to be the center of attraction?
 
I voted 0.30 carats per side. I have a 3-stone ring that has a 1.2 ct centre and 0.4 per side and personally, I feel that the sides kinda take away the limelight from centre stone. Here''s a picture of it on my hand. 5.5 ring size.

ML3stonehand.jpg
 
Thanks again for all the comments people!

I would like to suggest that people take care in their statements for and against a particular style of three-stone ring. Some comments have come accross to me as mean, and it seems a little silly to judge another style or ring when it is all subjective personal taste.
2.gif


I personally adore *all* the different proportions! Hence the dillemma.

DiaDiva That picture is very helpful since it is the same size centre stone. I think it looks great! But I do agree that it isn''t "all about the centre stone" in that ring, it is more of a equal trio.
 
I love three stone rings
30.gif
. The proportions I like best are 2:1 or having all the diamonds the same size. I just feel they look so classy and elegant. I have a 2:1 ratio three stone ring and absolutely love it.
 
You''re most welcome, Dreamer_D.

I wish I had used smaller sides now but don''t want to spend more money by buying new stones and resetting the ring. On the bright side, the finger coverage is amazing
9.gif
!
 
Date: 12/8/2009 7:42:26 PM
Author: DiaDiva
I wish I had used smaller sides now but don''t want to spend more money by buying new stones and resetting the ring. On the bright side, the finger coverage is amazing
9.gif
!
DiaDiva, I voted for smaller sides, but I must admit, I then looked at NOVAKS'' new 3-stone ring, & when I first saw yours in this thread, thought it might be the same one - I think hers & yours are beautiful! The proportions look good, it looks beautiful on your hand, and the 3 stones do look distinct.

And like you said, great finger coverage!
 
You''re right! DiaDiva''s ring looks a lot like mine - almost the exact proportions.
 
Date: 12/8/2009 8:44:46 PM
Author: NOVAKS
You''re right! DiaDiva''s ring looks a lot like mine - almost the exact proportions.

Novaks, yours is even more bling than mine...in the best way possible.
9.gif
30.gif
 
Dreamer, your three stone will be beautiful, because you take so much care and attention to every detail. I have total faith in you. You have a great project ahead.
 
Thanks, dotb. I need to wear it more.
3.gif
 
I'm watching this thread very closely, as I too am considering a 3-stone ring.

Lovely rings you ladies have posted btw. I love all the different proportions. I did for the longest time think that the 2:1 ratio looked the most appealing but now having seen the various ratios, I must say I love them all, for their differing looks.
 
I recently got the 3 stone from Erica/Grace which has a 1.2 center and 1 ct. sides. You can tell the sides are slightly smaller and I like the "balanced" look. The bling factor is there too although this one is very refined in the setting.
 
DiaDiva,

Very pretty ring!
 
I voted for the 50 pters, but 60 would work too! I note your survey didn't go all the way up to 1-ct sides!

When e-ring shopping, if I liked 3-stones they were ones with smaller 'accent' sidestones set lower than the center. But now that I'm a married lady...

I think there is something to be said for the blingtastic ring with more substantial sides! And there are ways to separate the three stones visually when setting them - either by use of prongs and spacing or the table height and angle. One thought, IIRC, you were thinking of doing a Leon 3-stone? The man has an eye. You could ask what size he recommends, though I guess I have seen him give people choices...
 
Date: 12/9/2009 10:41:26 AM
Author: cara
I voted for the 50 pters, but 60 would work too! I note your survey didn''t go all the way up to 1-ct sides!

When e-ring shopping, if I liked 3-stones they were ones with smaller ''accent'' sidestones set lower than the center. But now that I''m a married lady...

I think there is something to be said for the blingtastic ring with more substantial sides! And there are ways to separate the three stones visually when setting them - either by use of prongs and spacing or the table height and angle. One thought, IIRC, you were thinking of doing a Leon 3-stone? The man has an eye. You could ask what size he recommends, though I guess I have seen him give people choices...
I was thinking Leon at one point, but now I suspect he is not the best match for me
2.gif
hee hee hee
 
I''m usually a fan of the smaller stones, but I really like the .60s!
 
I tried on some Martin Flyer Flyer Fit 3 stone rings that were just gorgeous! The one below is the one I really liked. It has pear sidestones and a 1.25 ct center in this pic.
 

Attachments

Date: 12/9/2009 1:07:59 PM
Author: Laila619
I tried on some Martin Flyer Flyer Fit 3 stone rings that were just gorgeous! The one below is the one I really liked. It has pear sidestones and a 1.25 ct center in this pic.


ooohhh, pear side stones.... very nice
 
Date: 12/9/2009 1:07:59 PM
Author: Laila619
I tried on some Martin Flyer Flyer Fit 3 stone rings that were just gorgeous! The one below is the one I really liked. It has pear sidestones and a 1.25 ct center in this pic.
I tried pear sides at Tiffs and didn''t like the look on my hand. The rounds appealed to me more!

Wanna hear something funny? A three stone ring with a 1.1ct center and .50ct sides, all G VVS1, cost 30k at Tiffany''s. LOL! Yeah right
20.gif
 
Date: 12/9/2009 9:24:44 PM
Author: dreamer_dachsie
Date: 12/9/2009 1:07:59 PM

Author: Laila619

I tried on some Martin Flyer Flyer Fit 3 stone rings that were just gorgeous! The one below is the one I really liked. It has pear sidestones and a 1.25 ct center in this pic.

I tried pear sides at Tiffs and didn''t like the look on my hand. The rounds appealed to me more!


Wanna hear something funny? A three stone ring with a 1.1ct center and .50ct sides, all G VVS1, cost 30k at Tiffany''s. LOL! Yeah right
20.gif

uh huh, yeah right, you can so get what you want if you know what your after , and if anyone can do it, its you girl
 
Date: 12/9/2009 8:28:43 AM
Author: tradergirl
I recently got the 3 stone from Erica/Grace which has a 1.2 center and 1 ct. sides. You can tell the sides are slightly smaller and I like the ''balanced'' look. The bling factor is there too although this one is very refined in the setting.
And where are the pictures madam! I am waiting!
2.gif
 
I may be biased here because I have a three stone ring and all are the same size, so I think thats the best choice - LOL

However, as other have said a true three stone ring is the ratio of 2:1, but if you want your centre stone to stand out I would suggest a 4:1 ratio so 0.3-0.35 side stones


ETA: I''m not much help at all am I ?
1.gif
 
Date: 12/8/2009 1:57:20 PM
Author: Londongirl1


Date: 12/7/2009 5:30:01 PM
Author: Laila619
To me, the bigger side diamonds just look like one big blur/row of diamond. The smaller sidestones let the center stone shine.
I agree but I guess it depends on the look you're going for. I don't see the point in having a lovely centre stone if you're going to crowd it with diamonds just to say 'look at my bling'. Like I said, matter of personal opinion....

Sometimes its not about crowding or bling - When hubby bought my ring it was because I also 'inherited' 3 stepdaughters, so when I eventually have my ring prised off my finger LOL they get one stone each and there's no arguing about size/quality
9.gif


Having said that, I agree with the fact that smaller sidestones let the centre stone shine

If I was to design a ring specifically for me
36.gif
I would have a stunning centre stone and 2 side trillions in a ratio of about 2.5:1 or 3:1
 
Date: 12/8/2009 5:00:37 PM
Author: DiaDiva
I voted 0.30 carats per side. I have a 3-stone ring that has a 1.2 ct centre and 0.4 per side and personally, I feel that the sides kinda take away the limelight from centre stone. Here''s a picture of it on my hand. 5.5 ring size.
DiaDiva, do you have any more pictures of your ring, maybe from slightly different angles or further away? I am LOVING the proportions!
 
Hi DreamerD, I can take more shots from other angles tomorrow as we''re going out for a movie soon. Here''s a perspective shot for now...

3stoneperspectiveNew.jpg
 
I have one to share! Lemme find it!
12.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top