- Joined
- Jan 9, 2008
- Messages
- 8,237
I agree but I guess it depends on the look you''re going for. I don''t see the point in having a lovely centre stone if you''re going to crowd it with diamonds just to say ''look at my bling''. Like I said, matter of personal opinion....Date: 12/7/2009 5:30:01 PM
Author: Laila619
To me, the bigger side diamonds just look like one big blur/row of diamond. The smaller sidestones let the center stone shine.
I agree with this. As others have said, it depends on what look you''re going for, & that the larger sidestones are more anniversary-ish, while the smaller ones are more e-ring-ish, etc... , but as for me, I''m with those who say go with the smaller sidestones. e.g. MissGotRocks'' ring - I think her sidestones are beautiful & plenty big enough to accent her large center stone.Date: 12/7/2009 5:30:01 PM
Author: Laila619
To me, the bigger side diamonds just look like one big blur/row of diamond. The smaller sidestones let the center stone shine.
DiaDiva, I voted for smaller sides, but I must admit, I then looked at NOVAKS'' new 3-stone ring, & when I first saw yours in this thread, thought it might be the same one - I think hers & yours are beautiful! The proportions look good, it looks beautiful on your hand, and the 3 stones do look distinct.Date: 12/8/2009 7:42:26 PM
Author: DiaDiva
I wish I had used smaller sides now but don''t want to spend more money by buying new stones and resetting the ring. On the bright side, the finger coverage is amazing!![]()
Date: 12/8/2009 8:44:46 PM
Author: NOVAKS
You''re right! DiaDiva''s ring looks a lot like mine - almost the exact proportions.
I was thinking Leon at one point, but now I suspect he is not the best match for meDate: 12/9/2009 10:41:26 AM
Author: cara
I voted for the 50 pters, but 60 would work too! I note your survey didn''t go all the way up to 1-ct sides!
When e-ring shopping, if I liked 3-stones they were ones with smaller ''accent'' sidestones set lower than the center. But now that I''m a married lady...
I think there is something to be said for the blingtastic ring with more substantial sides! And there are ways to separate the three stones visually when setting them - either by use of prongs and spacing or the table height and angle. One thought, IIRC, you were thinking of doing a Leon 3-stone? The man has an eye. You could ask what size he recommends, though I guess I have seen him give people choices...
Date: 12/9/2009 1:07:59 PM
Author: Laila619
I tried on some Martin Flyer Flyer Fit 3 stone rings that were just gorgeous! The one below is the one I really liked. It has pear sidestones and a 1.25 ct center in this pic.
I tried pear sides at Tiffs and didn''t like the look on my hand. The rounds appealed to me more!Date: 12/9/2009 1:07:59 PM
Author: Laila619
I tried on some Martin Flyer Flyer Fit 3 stone rings that were just gorgeous! The one below is the one I really liked. It has pear sidestones and a 1.25 ct center in this pic.
Date: 12/9/2009 9:24:44 PM
Author: dreamer_dachsie
Date: 12/9/2009 1:07:59 PM
Author: Laila619
I tried on some Martin Flyer Flyer Fit 3 stone rings that were just gorgeous! The one below is the one I really liked. It has pear sidestones and a 1.25 ct center in this pic.
I tried pear sides at Tiffs and didn''t like the look on my hand. The rounds appealed to me more!
Wanna hear something funny? A three stone ring with a 1.1ct center and .50ct sides, all G VVS1, cost 30k at Tiffany''s. LOL! Yeah right![]()
And where are the pictures madam! I am waiting!Date: 12/9/2009 8:28:43 AM
Author: tradergirl
I recently got the 3 stone from Erica/Grace which has a 1.2 center and 1 ct. sides. You can tell the sides are slightly smaller and I like the ''balanced'' look. The bling factor is there too although this one is very refined in the setting.
Date: 12/8/2009 1:57:20 PM
Author: Londongirl1
I agree but I guess it depends on the look you're going for. I don't see the point in having a lovely centre stone if you're going to crowd it with diamonds just to say 'look at my bling'. Like I said, matter of personal opinion....Date: 12/7/2009 5:30:01 PM
Author: Laila619
To me, the bigger side diamonds just look like one big blur/row of diamond. The smaller sidestones let the center stone shine.
DiaDiva, do you have any more pictures of your ring, maybe from slightly different angles or further away? I am LOVING the proportions!Date: 12/8/2009 5:00:37 PM
Author: DiaDiva
I voted 0.30 carats per side. I have a 3-stone ring that has a 1.2 ct centre and 0.4 per side and personally, I feel that the sides kinda take away the limelight from centre stone. Here''s a picture of it on my hand. 5.5 ring size.