- Joined
- Apr 9, 2007
- Messages
- 2,264
Hi all, I'm still in the market for a 5-stone ring to wear as a standalone wedding band (no ering). I almost ordered it a few months back but financial obligations got in the way...
I'm still debating between a couple of styles - u-prong and open gallery. BGD has both - and I'm wondering which sits lower on the finger?
The BGD open gallery reminds me of the Tiffany style: http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/wedding-and-anniversary-bands/eternity-bands/open-gallery-5-stone-platinum-5388p
And the u-prong is beautiful as well, but it seems to sit up a little higher?? http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/wedding-and-anniversary-bands/eternity-bands/classic-5-stone-u-prong-platinum-5446p
WF has similar versions. I don't like the closed gallery style so that's not an option. I also don't think I want a trellis style. And no side stones.
So the WF ring in serious contention is the Skye: http://www.whiteflash.com/right-hand-rings/skye-five-stone-u-prong-diamond-right-hand-ring-572.htm (and WF has a sale going on right now which is also a plus)
Comments are wanted and much appreciated (again...)!
thanks
I'm still debating between a couple of styles - u-prong and open gallery. BGD has both - and I'm wondering which sits lower on the finger?
The BGD open gallery reminds me of the Tiffany style: http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/wedding-and-anniversary-bands/eternity-bands/open-gallery-5-stone-platinum-5388p
And the u-prong is beautiful as well, but it seems to sit up a little higher?? http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/wedding-and-anniversary-bands/eternity-bands/classic-5-stone-u-prong-platinum-5446p
WF has similar versions. I don't like the closed gallery style so that's not an option. I also don't think I want a trellis style. And no side stones.
So the WF ring in serious contention is the Skye: http://www.whiteflash.com/right-hand-rings/skye-five-stone-u-prong-diamond-right-hand-ring-572.htm (and WF has a sale going on right now which is also a plus)
Comments are wanted and much appreciated (again...)!
thanks