Hi Everyone. My name is.......(looks down) fortheloveofdiamonds and.....well.. I (cough!) am obessesed with all things sparkly.
Pscopers are NOT your average buyers. These are research hungry diamond nuts who are obsessed with all things sparkly.
As far as the apraisel goes, weren't you the one who said that your mother got a ring, and didn't even know how many carats it was? If not, then forgive me for what I'm about to say, but , no never mind. I'll keep that one to myself-
So witty. I love it.Date: 12/6/2004 8:36:26 PM
Author: MrsFrk
Actually, I spend little time at the computer. I probably spend as much time at the computer as you do handling diamonds.
If you had written a measured ''hey guys, I work at the Shane Co. and I want you to know...'' sort of response, instead of an on fire smiley face rant, perhaps we would listen to your point of view.
I''m glad you find me funny. I try to do my part during the holiday season.
CTP I see plenty of H&A''s that I could not call ideal in terms of light return. This is an ideal-scope image of an example - the upper girdles are leaking a lot - but it has fantastic H&A''s pattern and is an AGS 0.Date: 12/7/2004 12:30:29 AM
Author: cut to perfection
GD, bad news: Shane and Co. is a chain. Generally, more than three doors constitutes a chain by most standards. Also, although most chain stores strive to deliver a level of consistencey and a higher level of quality they usually just deliver junk...because they rely on price, not their educated sales staff to move product.
I hear a lot about this goodoldgold.com website....I don''t see what makes it so special. I examined some of their ''H&A'' stones and some of them had terrible attributes, most had at least one or two angles where the facets did not lineup to show correct arrows. The idea behind these stones is that they are cut to super-ideal standards. Not all ideal-cuts show hearts and arrows, but a stone that shows the correct proportions with hearts and arrows are generally ideal or better.
Many jewelers throw around the term ''ideal''. A 57% table with a 60% depth is not all that constitutes ''ideal''. Has anyone else experienced this?
Date: 12/7/2004 1:18:41 AM
Author: Garry H (Cut Nut)
CTP I see plenty of H&A's that I could not call ideal in terms of light return. This is an ideal-scope image of an example - the upper girdles are leaking a lot - but it has fantastic H&A's pattern and is an AGS 0.
John I like nice H & A''s.Date: 12/7/2004 31:32 AM![]()
Author: JohnQuixote
Date: 12/7/2004 1:18:41 AM
Author: Garry H (Cut Nut)
CTP I see plenty of H&A''s that I could not call ideal in terms of light return. This is an ideal-scope image of an example - the upper girdles are leaking a lot - but it has fantastic H&A''s pattern and is an AGS 0.
Garry, I know you take many opportunities to knock H&A, and this time so will I...How can you say the arrows on that image are ''fantastic'' (especially in 2:30,3:30 and 8:30 positions)? Look in the center and you can see that the hearts patterning will be out as well. Do you have the hearts image? It will be much more telling.![]()
Then, Shane Co. is goog.Date: 12/6/2004 9:49:59 PM
Author: GD
I guess you could say there is goog in everyone, GD