Question on Vache U-113 6-Prong Setting

[mchap]

Hi,

I recently posted another thread to help me find the perfect diamond for my 40th wedding anniversary. Today I secured a diamond from WF. I cannot thank everyone enough. This would not have happened if it were not for the feedback and suggestions from this forum.

For the setting I chose the Vache U-113 6-Prong in Platinum. The diamond is a 2.055. I like the Tiffany setting and this one seemed very close.

From looking at the photos of the setting I felt that the prongs for the Vache may be a little clunky. But it could just be the photos. When I spoke with Becca at WF today she said the jeweler can make the prongs more delicate looking. Something about shaving them down.

Has anyone had this done at WF for this particular setting? Did you like the results? Also does anyone have this setting and do you feel the prongs are delicate?

https://www.whiteflash.com/engageme...vatche-6-prong-solitaire-wedding-set-4571.htm

 

[Johnbt]

All I can tell you is that since we got the ring last April the comments have all been about the WF ACA diamond. She is still getting comments and compliments. Everyone likes the setting, but they’ve mesmerized by the diamond.
It’s a size 5.5 platinum in an unaltered U-113. The diamond is a 1.51 F VVS2.

We like the proportions.

 

[sledge]

I designed my fiancee's ring using DK and when I got to this part of the detail, I was a little unsure. I ended up going with delicate claw prongs and both my fiancee and me both really like them. For us it was the right choice. I think they'd look great on the U-113.

Although we used DK for the setting, WF has a good bench and will do you right if you decide this is what you want.

 

[msop04]

The Vatche prongs aren't clunky. They are perfect. I wouldn't mess with them at all.

ETA: Remember that the photos are SUPER enlarged. They will be delicate IRL. @diamondseeker2006 has this setting, so maybe she'll chime in.

 

[blueMA]

@diamondseeker2006 vache prongs below with an AVR stone

More pics on the thread
https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/my-2-29-ct-avr-take-1.190100/

 

[msop04]

I think we need a photo showing a real life perspective...

 

[blueMA]

I do wonder what's Vache as is vs prongs made to be more Tiffany's repro.
I see many U113 looking more like Tiffany's tab prongs vs the below WF photo of the Vache
I'd get the difference hashed out with WF reps.

 

[msop04]

I do wonder what's Vache as is vs prongs made to be more Tiffany's repro.
I see many U113 looking more like Tiffany's tab prongs vs the below WF photo of the Vache
I'd get the difference hashed out with WF reps.

These look more rounded and less "tab/Tiffany-like"...

 

[blueMA]

These look more rounded and less "tab/Tiffany-like"...

Yup, I've just posted this on another thread, but this is a genuine Tiffany setting, which looks softer than some of the Vache

https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/need-expert-advice-on-an-upsetting-situation.246251/

 

[kal2021]

I know you’ve seen it but for the others who maybe didn’t and find this thread here is my U-113 with no modifications. Not clunky at all IRL.

 

[msop04]

I know you’ve seen it but for the others who maybe didn’t and find this thread here is my U-113 with no modifications. Not clunky at all IRL.

Perfection.

 

[msop04]

@kal2021... would you mind posting some profile shots so I can see the height of the basket?

 

[SimoneDi]

Perfection.

Agreed. The vatche U113 is IMO the closest to the original T&Co solitaire. It’s beautiful!

 

[CareBear]

Vatche does prongs beautifully! Their U-113 tabs are the closest to the 'standard' Tiffany tabs, though the tabs at Tiffany can vary from time to time. I wouldn't change thing!

 

[ringbling17]

I used to own a Tiffany set which I sold on preloved. Mind you the set was originally purchased in 1999 but I was able to find pictures. This diamond is .55 carats for size reference and the ring was a size 5.25.
The prongs are tab prongs and do seem chunky but in real life they were just right.

 

[blueMA]

I notice the recent Tiffany's prongs looking more delicate (below is a 1.3 ct stone) and prefer the look compared to a bit wider and squarish tabs, but that's my OCD and personal preference. However, I'm sure the difference won't be as noticeable in real life.

 

[kmoro]

I’m not sure why - I assume that it has something to do with reflection - but prongs always look bigger in pictures than in real life.

 

[blueMA]

Btw, I used to not care about prongs befor the PS BUG bit me. For an example, this is my recent diamond stud in a platinum setting that I simply chose along with La pousrtte backs without specifying the prongs but I wish I had since they’re so blah although I don’t notice the issue so much in real life.

 

[blueMA]

Compare that to @diamondseeker2006 custom setting by WF.
Notice the diffence? Yup it pays to be attentive to details, if you have a choice.

 

[msop04]

I notice the recent Tiffany's prongs looking more delicate (below is a 1.3 ct stone) and prefer the look compared to a bit wider and squarish tabs, but that's my OCD and personal preference. However, I'm sure the difference won't be as noticeable in real life.

Hmmmm... I see these as much less delicate than the flatter tabs, because they stick out further. LOL

 

[blueMA]

I believe prongs also contribute to the personality of a piece. I've posted these in my recent opal thread, but I was furious when a local jeweler butchered the prongs on my new opal pendant.

Pendant ended up with tab prongs.

Ring with claw prongs. More edgy, modern.

 

[blueMA]

Posting here as well, but here's VC Gabriella. Edgy sharp hand-forged talon prongs.

 

[Johnbt]

I like them all, large settings and small, but I think I prefer the larger, bolder prongs because they always make me think of a chess rook or a round tower with crenelations . Fwiw, the raised parts are called merlons and the opening between two merlons is called a crenel. But that's me.

 

[blueMA]

I like them all, large settings and small, but I think I prefer the larger, bolder prongs because they always make me think of a chess rook or a round tower with crenelations . Fwiw, the raised parts are called merlons and the opening between two merlons is called a crenel. But that's me.

Ha! I see the resemblance.
It really all comes down to the personal preference and how particular you are.

 

[sledge]

So @mchap, how does this answer your question?

Seriously, it's a matter of personal preference as @blueMA said. What one loves, another may not. Structually, you will be fine with any of them. Pick one you think you and you SO likes the best.

FWIW, @Johnbt do you think it's a coincidence those crenelations that are in perfect 0 and 90 degree orientation, and that is the same move pattern upon which the rook moves? I love playing chess.

 

[mchap]

All I can tell you is that since we got the ring last April the comments have all been about the WF ACA diamond. She is still getting comments and compliments. Everyone likes the setting, but they’ve mesmerized by the diamond.
It’s a size 5.5 platinum in an unaltered U-113. The diamond is a 1.51 F VVS2.

We like the proportions.

This looks beautiful. Thanks for sharing and pointing out that you really don't see the prongs and more the diamond. I am not going to have the prongs adjusted.

 

[mchap]

@diamondseeker2006 vache prongs below with an AVR stone

More pics on the thread
https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/my-2-29-ct-avr-take-1.190100/

Thanks for the photos. The ring looks beautiful in the setting.

 

[mchap]

I used to own a Tiffany set which I sold on preloved. Mind you the set was originally purchased in 1999 but I was able to find pictures. This diamond is .55 carats for size reference and the ring was a size 5.25.
The prongs are tab prongs and do seem chunky but in real life they were just right.

Thanks for the photos.

 

[mchap]

So @mchap, how does this answer your question?

Seriously, it's a matter of personal preference as @blueMA said. What one loves, another may not. Structually, you will be fine with any of them. Pick one you think you and you SO likes the best.

FWIW, @Johnbt do you think it's a coincidence those crenelations that are in perfect 0 and 90 degree orientation, and that is the same move pattern upon which the rook moves? I love playing chess.

Thanks Sledge! The more I look at the photos the more the prongs are growing on me. I will probably leave them as is! I guess it is all about the diamond and as previously said that most people will just notice that.

 

[Dmndsr4evr11]

The Vatche prongs aren't clunky. They are perfect. I wouldn't mess with them at all.

ETA: Remember that the photos are SUPER enlarged. They will be delicate IRL. @diamondseeker2006 has this setting, so maybe she'll chime in.

@msop04 - I really like your setting too. What kind is yours and how think is the ring? I am loving the 6 prongs more and more. Thanks.