MonkeyPie
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2008
- Messages
- 6,059
Date: 7/5/2008 10:22:47 PM
Author: arjunajane
Monkey, I''m not positive but I think Ritani may offer 1.8mm shanks.
The only thing is, I personally wouldn''t like to go under 2mm for structural and security reasons, ya know? Do you think you will ever wear it without the bands?
Date: 7/5/2008 10:47:02 PM
Author: AGBF
Have you seen mine?
https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/agbfs-solitaire.7382/
Deb
![]()
Hi, monkeypie, here is diamondnut''s thread w/ a 1.6mm shank solitaire by Leon... https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/my-2-51-e-vs1-upgrade-in-a-leon-setting-is-here.81001/Date: 7/5/2008 10:18:00 PM
Author:MonkeyPie
And if there is, can you point me towards it?I want something very thin since it will be sitting between two bands.![]()
Date: 7/5/2008 11:03:19 PM
Author: heb1976
Hi, monkeypie, here is diamondnut''s thread w/ a 1.6mm shank solitaire by Leon... https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/my-2-51-e-vs1-upgrade-in-a-leon-setting-is-here.81001/Date: 7/5/2008 10:18:00 PM
Author:MonkeyPie
And if there is, can you point me towards it?I want something very thin since it will be sitting between two bands.![]()
I have a halo solitaire from Leon that is 1.6-1.7mm and it seems very sturdy. Were you looking for a pave type band or a plain band?
Date: 7/5/2008 10:56:01 PM
Author: MonkeyPie
OMG. Where on earth did you get it? has it bent at all? That was way thinner than I thought possible.
Date: 7/5/2008 11:06:16 PM
Author: AGBF
I designed it to look like my original engagement ring, which was a gold oval with two 1-point diamonds sitting inside the oval. The original ring had a knife edge, invisible looking, band and was very, very delicate. I had this ring made up by my local jeweler in Stamford, Connecticut. (Rupert at Grunberger Jewelers executed it.) It is very strong. It has not bent. If you look at it from the side you will see why!
A former poster made a collage of pictures of the solitaire and its jackets up for me; the collage is in this thread if you want to see a couple more photos.
https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/show-me-the-most-beautiful-solitaire-setting.69074/page-2
Hmm..I guess so. But will the soldering then ruin the look of the really thin band you''re going for?Date: 7/5/2008 10:26:51 PM
Author: MonkeyPie
Date: 7/5/2008 10:22:47 PM
Author: arjunajane
Monkey, I''m not positive but I think Ritani may offer 1.8mm shanks.
The only thing is, I personally wouldn''t like to go under 2mm for structural and security reasons, ya know? Do you think you will ever wear it without the bands?
I plan to get the solitaire and one band soldered together and leave one loose so I can wear it alone if I want to...think that would help?
Date: 7/6/2008 12:01:53 AM
Author: LaraOnline
That is a very interesting ring, AGBF!
I absolutely love it!
May I ask how high it sits, to keep its strength? Do you have any profile shots?
ETA: Monkey Pie, it seems like such a simple design... even though it was custom, perhaps something similar won't cost much more than a more elaborate off the shelf design!
Unfortunatly, I only have about 1k to work with, and everything thats left can go towards a nicer diamond. Maybe in WG it is less? Doesn''t Lean require you to send them your stone to set it though? I''d really rather not, especially since I won''t have my stone until after I find the setting.Date: 7/7/2008 12:31:11 AM
Author: Deelight
MonkeyPie, I don''t know what your budget is but FF got a recent quote from LM and it was really reasonable for a simple solitaire: in platinum $1700.
Date: 7/7/2008 9:55:38 AM
Author: AGBF
Date: 7/6/2008 12:01:53 AM
Author: LaraOnline
That is a very interesting ring, AGBF!
I absolutely love it!
May I ask how high it sits, to keep its strength? Do you have any profile shots?
ETA: Monkey Pie, it seems like such a simple design... even though it was custom, perhaps something similar won''t cost much more than a more elaborate off the shelf design!
Thank you for asking about the ring, Lara. I do not know how high it is offhand. I am sure that I have some profile shots somewhere. Right now I have to get rid of a computer virus, then, perhaps, I can think about the ring. Right now, the computer keeps shutting down as I write! I have to call Microsoft!
Deb
![]()
Hi again MonkeyPie - considering your budget, I would suggest WF''s settings. I don''t think for their pricing you can beat the quality.Date: 7/7/2008 11:12:36 AM
Author: MonkeyPie
Unfortunatly, I only have about 1k to work with, and everything thats left can go towards a nicer diamond. Maybe in WG it is less? Doesn''t Lean require you to send them your stone to set it though? I''d really rather not, especially since I won''t have my stone until after I find the setting.Date: 7/7/2008 12:31:11 AM
Author: Deelight
MonkeyPie, I don''t know what your budget is but FF got a recent quote from LM and it was really reasonable for a simple solitaire: in platinum $1700.
Date: 7/7/2008 10:11:16 PM
Author: Lynn B
'Depth' is commonly increased when 'width' is decreased. It helps keep the ring structurally sound, and can make very attractive rings, IMO.
Date: 7/8/2008 9:38:47 AM
Author: AGBF
Date: 7/7/2008 10:11:16 PM
Author: Lynn B
''Depth'' is commonly increased when ''width'' is decreased. It helps keep the ring structurally sound, and can make very attractive rings, IMO.
Lynn B nailed it as far as my ring is concerned! My ring is quite sound structurally, not at all fragile. It is extremely deep. If one looks at it straight on, the band is nearly invisible. From the side, one can see that the shank has considerable substance. The challenge I face now is how to post pictures without my software. I may have to wait until I am in Virginia to put up any new photos. (My virus appears to be gone.)
Deborah
![]()
I understand sweetheart, I hope you find what you''re looking for soon.Date: 7/8/2008 12:16:14 AM
Author: MonkeyPie
arjunajane, we are in the process of getting the diamond exchanged. (Thankfully we were able to!) It should be just around the 1 carat range like the emerald cut was, EC''s tend to cost more than a princess cut. The husband is only letting me know the stats of stones because he is rather insistent I don''t know it''s price![]()
While $750 for a quality setting is not that bad, and I''d love to have WF setting, I really wanted to go less. I know WF gets to charge quite a bit more than I have ever paid for a setting before because of the name and reputation, but I cringe at the thought of spending a big chunk on something so simple. My original setting was elaborate and cost about as much as your setting :/ Yes, I know, I should be willing to pay for quality, but I really have to scrounge and work hard for what I can buy, so the thought of spending it all on one tiny thing kills me.![]()
I think I''m just being difficult and cheap. DH says I can have whatever I want within budget, but all I see is a bill paid off with what''s leftover...lol.