shape
carat
color
clarity

I think this one is a keeper!

OECrystal

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Apr 6, 2014
Messages
141
Hello again, :wavey:

You may recall my last post about whether or not I should keep this 4ct M I1 RB diamond https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/4-ct-m-i1-rb-to-keep-or-not-to-keep.211290/. Although a beautiful stone, I ended up returning it with the hopes of finding an OEC. Well, the day has come much sooner than expected. I found an OEC with similar specs, 4.4 ct M I1. I am definitely leaning toward keeping this one, but am hoping for some input from PS. Pics below...

(making an appearance in several photos is my 1.6ct L VS2 AVR OEC, finger size 3 – which I love and am not replacing/upgrading)

img_3182.png

img_3181.jpg

img_3184_2.jpg

img_3186_0.jpg

img_3190_0.jpg

img_3191.jpg

img_3207.jpg

img_3216.jpg

img_3211.jpg

img_3217.jpg

img_3222.jpg
 

canuk-gal

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Apr 19, 2004
Messages
25,713
HI:

Notwithstanding the nicks on the girdle, would the grade making inclusions represent a challenge/problem for setting?

cheers--Sharon
 

OECrystal

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Apr 6, 2014
Messages
141
Hi Sharon,

Thanks for your reply! The inclusions do not pose any difficulty with setting. While they are visible with my zoomed-in pics, they are not as obvious in person. I do not know the history of the diamond but was told by the seller that it is over 100 years old. The nicks on the girdle do not bother me. To me, they are part of the history of the diamond. I am thinking of a bezel setting to help protect it from further damage.
 

OECrystal

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Apr 6, 2014
Messages
141
So after much back and forth, my husband and I have decided to keep this diamond. I wish the photos conveyed how nice it looks in person.

So next is deciding on a setting. Ideally, I would love to have a bezel with tapered french cuts, like LGK's seen here: https://www.pricescope.com/communit...et-my-3-39-ct-oec-tapered-french-cuts.158320/. But, that is not in the budget at this time. I am looking to get a temporary setting from Stuller. I need some help deciding which one would be best. My concerns are having a large stone and small finger could cause the ring to look very "bulky" in the cathedral/shoulder area like the pic below. Please help me pick out a setting! I am looking for rose gold with at least 6 prongs.

This is what I do NOT want:
image_118.png


Here are the settings I am considering:

http://www.stuller.com/products/build/122563/11414283/?groupId=122657#/mounting-options
image__1__1.png


http://www.stuller.com/products/71560/1000930918/?groupId=111742
image__2__0.png


http://www.stuller.com/products/build/122114/8912828/?groupId=118974#/mounting-options
image__3__0.png


http://www.stuller.com/products/7198/289004/?groupId=36594
image__4_.png


http://www.stuller.com/products/build/122118/9143423/?groupId=119127#/mounting-options
image__5_.png


http://www.stuller.com/products/build/122004/3637881/?groupId=113775#/mounting-options
image__6_.png


http://www.stuller.com/products/150200/3373422/?groupId=7713&categoryId=11232
image__7_.png

Any thoughts or opinions for which would be a good option? Thanks in advance! =)
 
Q

Queenie60

Guest
I would do the second or the sixth setting you are showing. There are more prongs on these to protect the girdle and to cover up the inclusions around the edge of the stone. Just my opinion. :wavey:
 

ac117

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
4,062
All very pretty but I really like the 6th, 1st and 3rd (in that order)!
 

soxfan

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
4,814
6 is one of my favorite solitaire settings in existence.
 
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top