- Joined
- Apr 3, 2004
- Messages
- 33,852
Of course the left don't wanna talk about the record highs on wall street...
I don't know about you, but I'm self-soothing in between ranting tirades and pathetic weeping. Good thing I'm home with only the cats. Those poor creatures are snorting copious amounts of catnip in their own self-soothing attempts to deal with their crazy momma.What the actual fuck?
Why is that warthog allowed anywhere near children???
Where is the dislike button.
I don't know about you, but I'm self-soothing in between ranting tirades and pathetic weeping. Good thing I'm home with only the cats. Those poor creatures are snorting copious amounts of catnip in their own self-soothing attempts to deal with their crazy momma.
This posting is rated excellent for use of imagery; irony; and great SAT vocabulary words.
(But the reader's sympathies are extended to the posting's author.)
Of course the left don't wanna talk about the record highs on wall street...
It seemed fitting to put this here since I do not want to open a new thread. It is an interesting read from a perspective I identify with for the most part. Some of you may enjoy it even though it is long.
http://amp.nationalreview.com/artic...ail&utm_term=0_cfcb868ceb-f1c21172fd-83959769
I am glad you enjoyed it.I did enjoy it and I kept thinking, we as America are de-evolving.. devolving? A Buckley conservative to Trump.. mind boggling. It's like Pandora's Box.. it's opened but how do we get this bad genie back in the box or bottle? can we go back to being cordial? I don't think so.
Of course the left don't wanna talk about the record highs on wall street...
the stock market only for the rich? an avg person don't own any 401K or IRAs?..Wakey Wakey, Dear NapKing!: We've been trying to talk about them for years---->hello income disparity/1-%-ers/distribution of wealth.
the stock market only for the rich? an avg person don't own any 401K or IRAs?..
Of course the left don't wanna talk about the record highs on wall street...
Dammit. My post doubled and then when I deleted one it deleted both.
I am not so sure about this article. I was able to find relationship to victim, race, ethnicity in the new Explorer and I like the way it is displayed rather than a static table that is not user friendly. Click on a state in the Home page and all of the info comes up. It is even by year if you change the drop down or move the line on the graph.Is the left willing to discuss this?
https://fivethirtyeight.com/feature...-issued-under-trump-is-missing-a-ton-of-info/
Is the left willing to discuss this?
https://fivethirtyeight.com/feature...-issued-under-trump-is-missing-a-ton-of-info/
And that was the point of this whole article. Not accurate information disseminated to the public.“it also seems like part of a trend in the Trump administration: the suppression of government data and an unwillingness to share information with the press and public.” - from the article.
And that was the point of this whole article. Not accurate information disseminated to the public.
I found the info that "seemed" to be missing just fine in the Explorer program. The accuracy I spoke of is the article not FBI data. All of the raw data is still available for studies.If you are talking about the fivethirtyeight article @Tekate linked to, it’s not the accuracy of the information that is being raised; its the availability (or lack of availability to be precise).
I found the info that "seemed" to be missing just fine in the Explorer program. The accuracy I spoke of is the article not FBI data.
Why don't you look upthread. If you want tables there are nice little download links on the Explorer program back to 1995. I don't care that statisticians might have to work a little harder for their info. It's not like the FBI just stopped collecting it.Perhaps you should share with fiverhirtyeight. Better yet, post the tables here. I’d love to see them.