- Joined
- Dec 25, 2012
- Messages
- 3,465
Could someone maybe tell Mike Pence to stop worrying so much about what the LGBT community and women are doing?
Trump is no longer calling Ted Cruz “Lyin Ted”. Cruz is now “Beautiful Ted” Yuck!!!!!
Civility ? The Dems? . Who is harassing who in public?Republicans are now the party of Trump. The thing Trump has been most successful at is dividing the country. I want nothing more than to get back to civility in politics. My fear is Trump has brought the country to a new low and it may never go back to what was once considered normal decency and respect. Someone needs to tell Trump to Be Best.
I won'tMy guess is you too will be angry when the republicans gut Social Security and Medicare. Hopefully you won’t interrupt anyone’s dinner over it.
Civility ? The Dems? . Who is harassing who in public?
He also called Cruz "beautiful." I want O'Rourke to trounce Cruz so bad I can taste it.Trump called himself a “nationalist” at his rally in Texas tonight.
He also called Cruz "beautiful." I want O'Rourke to trounce Cruz so bad I can taste it.
He also called Cruz "beautiful." I want O'Rourke to trounce Cruz so bad I can taste it.
You know Hannity is pissy and jealous now.
100 pages of Trump bashing don't you love it!?? . Sadly for the Dems. they can't trash talk about the economy.
100 pages of Trump bashing don't you love it!?? . Sadly for the Dems. they can't trash talk about the economy.
Time for you to research the facts @Dancing Fire.
Here are the facts:
DF only posts the crap he does because he is entertained by riling up liberals. He has no intention of backing up any of his words with pesky little facts. I respond to him because it entertains me. (DF & I should probably seek therapy for our weird entertainment fetishes, but it is what it is.)
Yep you can do it all you want, but, you are making assumptions and maybe where you live there is a preponderance of Christians who do not vote as you do. But that is not the case for Rs across the board or conservatives for that matter. Do you have unions for the Big 3 where you live? If so then they would not likely be in favor of this measure. Though in my experience public sector unions, and specifically bloated pensions, are part of the reason for out of control state and municipal unfunded liability. A balanced budget is a good idea and our Congress should do it as both sides spend like drunken sailors on their respective pet agendas. But I don't know what any of that has to do with being Christian or "following their shepherd." As far as being driven by Jesus First, Family Second, Prosperity Gospel mentality, I don't see anything wrong with that. It is a free country after all, at least for now. It seems you hate where you live as you complain about it quite a bit yet you have lived there all your life. Why don't you move to somewhere more conducive to your ideology if you are so unhappy? People do it all the time and that is the beauty of a constitutional republic of states as anyone can find a place to their liking. Life is too short to be miserable but no one said it was going to be a picnic either. If you choose to stay then it's your choice just like the others living around you. But if you are grumbling just to grumble then it really must not be all that terrible. There is no Utopia.
If I thought all of the left leaning people in the country were screaming at people in restaurants, getting arrested in the SC, and whatever other SJW nutjob harassment of the day, then I would be more worried for our country. Fact is that group is not the majority or even a large minority, but it seems like it because of media coverage. Most people are going to work, taking care of their business, and voting when it's time. If the harassment continues or gets worse, people in the middle will get tired of it and pull the lever for the ones not acting like lunatics.
People are getting tired of it.
http://www.tmz.com/2018/10/20/senator-mitch-mcconnell-confronted-restaurant-protesters/
You (collective) don't get to decide what's in someone else's best interest and neither do I. You can piss and moan about it all you want but in the end you have no say. Does that make you angry that you cannot dictate what someone else does? You only have their best interests at heart correct? I'm fine with you living as you like as long as you do the same in return. People should spend less time worrying about what their neighbors are doing and more time helping those who are in need. JMHO.
Of course helping neighbors is good and everyone should do it. But everything you talk about IMO is not the business or purpose of the Federal government beyond what we're already stuck with. There is plenty that states can do but everything should not be dumped onto the Feds. This is where the confusion comes in about what Rs are talking about and what Ds want.What if I want to help my neighbors but I can't due to age but I can and wish to help them with money? as in my tax dollars going for food, bills etc?if need be I don't mind if my taxes and yours are raised a bit to help. If people DID worry more about their neighbors and want to help each other then I would be right there with you, but I don't find republicans as wanting to help, they would like me to help my neighbor but what about the neighbor on the other side, the cheapskate who wants low taxes so they can buy a boat? or whatever. This is why we put the government in charge of helping others on a federal lever (and also at a state level) Because NOT all neighbors want to help and the ones that do give more and it becomes out of whack. We all should give some to help each other. Right or Left.
Bloated union pensions? why are they bloated? who decides if they are bloated? you? me? Trump? I dunno, union busting is a goal of the right and they have done a great job of killing unions and now we have the 'right to get fired anytime for anything' law they tout as 'freedom' everyone knows if you walk out of a job and the next job finds out about it then your chances of getting a job at the new place are nil.. we are all taught to 'give notice' the hypocrisy of right to work makes me ill.
The christian right has an agenda do you not agree? I think they do..
1) make everyone a christian
2) ban abortion
3) ban other faiths
4) teach religion in schools (christian)
5) prayer in school
6) tithing
off hand all I can think of but I'm sure there is more.
As an atheist/sometime agnostic I find this agenda more than I can stomach, but I do recognize that I must live together with my fellow brethren and I must give at times because that is fair. Redwood, some of us just cannot get up and move just because our neighbors are religious zealots (my word). But we work to change what we can in our own towns.
Why is the left screaming at McConnell and his wife in restaurants? People have a right to say what they feel and as an elected official he and his group must hear what the people say, I doubt he'd welcome them into his office and listen intently and be considerate.. at Trump rally's the lock her up mantra is terrible, trumpsters accost reporters, flip them the bird, this is what trump has brought to us, rude, inexcusable behavior, if you don't like it and it bothers you that people accost McConnell and Flake but not a reporter then you must not read about it because it's wrong on both sides, but as I said, this is where Trump has brought us.
You cannot decide what is best for me, but you better take into consideration what my thoughts are and I cannot decide for you but I had better take into consideration your thoughts because we need to come to the table and work together before Trump ruins what is left of our great republic and our standing in the world. We used to be able to do this. People had more compassion.
Of course helping neighbors is good and everyone should do it. But everything you talk about IMO is not the business or purpose of the Federal government beyond what we're already stuck with. There is plenty that states can do but everything should not be dumped onto the Feds. This is where the confusion comes in about what Rs are talking about and what Ds want.
As to harassment of politicians, you can approach them in public but not screaming, taking their food off the table, etc. If you want to have a conversation about policy I am all for that but what is going on both sides now is ridiculous and has no other intent than to harass for viral clip purposes. Those people don't want to have rational discourse. If they scream with no discourse they deserve no respect. Would you want to respond positively to someone screaming in your face? What kind of positive outcome can come from that kind of exchange?