I checked the BGB online inventory and see nothing below 1 ct right now.
However, I'd double check and give them a call and see if they have stones that have yet to get listed online.
Out of curiosity, which HPD was it?I checked with BG and they rarely stock blues in the carat range that’s within my budget. In fact, they’ve historically only had 2 per their rep. WF excludes fluorescence in their ACA line and HPD did have one with fluorescence but not within budget and not going to break the bank. JA had few potential candidates until ideal scopes presented light leakage and they couldn’t guarantee H&A unless was in their “branded” line. And the list goes on...hence, virtual inventory.
Jonathan will be making and posting video of the .7 sometime today and because it is at a significant savings (almost $1500, practically a steal), I don’t think I’ll be too heartbroken over it just being ideal and not super-ideal. Will keep you posted.
n fact, they’ve historically only had 2 per their rep.
None of what he actual says there about a potential ASET applies to the stone in discussion here.
I also dispute that it will look less bright in diffused lighting.
I did not say there were not difference between diamonds but to automatically assume all diamonds with a 35.5 degree crown is deficient in defused lighting is wrong.I do agree with the article from what I've seen. For an immediate example, even with the latest long comparison between the two ACAs the op ended up choosing the stone that looks slightly crisper and brighter in diffused lighting even with the slightest angle differences (one more for fire) between two very well cut ACAs?
https://www.pricescope.com/communit...ned-out-to-be-h-i.245823/page-16#post-4479963
No one said all 35.5 are deficient. But the op does need to understand that the 35.5 crown is indeed on the higher side of what's preferred for better balanced stone.I did not say there were not difference between diamonds but to automatically assume a diamond with a 35.5 degree crown is deficient in defused lighting is wrong.
Out of curiosity, which HPD was it?
It's a pretty good stone. It's not as well cut as the stone you originally posted.
Look at the hearts - they're varied in size, with clefts, with varied lgh and Vs.
That's being super critical, but I do like the angle combo.
If you look at that video I posted earlier at 1:30, you'll see why I don't trust ASET. It's just an elimination tool. You could have two ASET that look virtually the same, but with very different actual real life performance.
I did watch the video and it was very informative! I was just hoping to source another viable diamond for side to side comparison, but I think you’re right about the original one being of better caliber than this latest inquiry. Not worth paying for shipping to bring it in.
Per the list I posted, there are options based on certs alone, but only a fraction have images available upon request, and then amongst those, the potential contenders dwindle considerably.
Also, if you want a mind cleanliness, ask Jonathan if he could make a video of the stone next to around 34.5/40.8 (balanced) superideal stone, and if you still like the side-by-side performance, then that's all that matters.
Wow, had no idea it's so rare for them to carry that range. @sledge just recently procured diamond below a carat with great savings.
Taking one diamond and using it to apply to all diamonds with a certain crown angle is like saying all blue mustangs are fast.
Even the one with a 100 horsepower 4 banger?
While you're waiting - you seem like an intelligent person interested in all pertinent detail.
Since this article directly relates to the stone you're purchasing. be sure to read under the "Fire" section.
https://www.prosumerdiamonds.com/character-diamond/
"What I am talking about is the difference between a 34/41 CA/PA, a 34.5/40.8 CA/PA, and a 35/40.6 CA/PA. A diamond with a 34/41 CA/PA is more optimized for brightness and one with a 35/40.6 CA/PA is more optimized for fire. The 34.5/40.8 CA/PA is the most balanced in terms of brightness and fire."
Also, read about FIC vs BIC
http://www.diamond-cut.com.au/23_bicfic.htm
I would think Brian the cutter would source his own stones. Interesting.I don't know about 400. I've never heard of any concrete numbers. But yes, there are a multitude of cutters who can cut a diamond with ideal proportions and perfect symmetry. Honestly, any skilled cutter can do it. It just takes more time to cut a diamond to exacting standards, and there is usually more loss of rough, so most cutters will usually not take the time to do so when the target market for their cut stones is general diamond retailers. In such cases, cutting within the rather broad confines of the GIA excellent grade is perfectly acceptable.
But it's not like there is some sort of trade secret to cutting a SuperIdeal diamond, tucked away in the secret vaults of the SuperIdeal vendors only to be shared with their select guild of cutters, who must take an oath of secrecy prior to learning the craft with failure to comply resulting in death. Actually, WF, BGD, and VC all source their diamonds from multiple cutting houses. CBI is the only branded SuperIdeal diamond where all of the cut stones originate from a single cutting house.
There are plenty of well cut diamonds that make their way out onto the open market. You just need to be slightly more diligent in your search to find one. You can obviously ask for help here on PS and the regular posters can help to identify a nice diamond for you. Alternatively, you can use this new concierge service that Rhino has set up. I'm excited to see him getting back into the game of sourcing MRBs. His sourcing and selection of GIA-graded MRBs was superb while he was at Good Old Gold, and I was a saddened to see him leave to focus on old cuts at August Vintage (although happy for him that he started his own business). Happy to hear he'll be sourcing both old cuts and new cuts now.
Another opinion masquerading as facts."What I am talking about is the difference between a 34/41 CA/PA, a 34.5/40.8 CA/PA, and a 35/40.6 CA/PA. A diamond with a 34/41 CA/PA is more optimized for brightness and one with a 35/40.6 CA/PA is more optimized for fire. The 34.5/40.8 CA/PA is the most balanced in terms of brightness and fire."
no, 34/41, with 80lgh - I love em, with no obstruction issues and super bright and sparkly.A few threads back didn't you say you were seeking a 35/41 combo when searching? What was your thoughts there? That intrigued me as I don't see that often. And as you eluded, things get nasty at 41.2.
I am a fan of that combination as well when tightly cut with tables in the 54-56 range. They love long stars also 55-60.no, 34/41, with 80lgh - I love em, with no obstruction issues and super bright and sparkly.
Yes you won't see that often and never carried by superideal vendors unless you ask for a custom cut, and most of the stones with that combo are poor. That why I had to look for several months.
I am a fan of that combination as well when tightly cut. They love long stars also 55-60.
They do not tolerate painting or digging well at all.
At one time I would have said it was the best combo until I learned that there is no one best combo.
To my eyes they were super well balanced and there was at one time a cutting cutting a bunch of them.
Sadly De Beers put them out of business.
no, 34/41, with 80lgh - I love em, with no obstruction issues and super bright and sparkly.
Yes you won't see that often and never carried by superideal vendors unless you ask for a custom cut, and most of the stones with that combo are poor. That why I had to look for several months.
Yes, but my visual acuity is apparently above normal.And your eyes could detect and found preference to a 34/41 over a 34/40.9 or 34/40.8?
Yes, but my visual acuity is apparently above normal.
I'm one of few who could spot a diamond vs stimulants at a glance, despite several PS threads arguing it's impossible.