Find your diamond
Find your jewelry
shape
carat
color
clarity

help me find my dream OMC elongated warmer ideally 2.5 - 3 ct [or "spready"]

maryjane04 said:
You have some good options there @TnTWalter

I guess it really comes down on how important size is for you. What's your finger size for reference? Also what setting are you leaning towards? This could help with the size a bit.
Click to expand...

my finger is 6-7 depending on day lol
I am leaning towards a bezel setting and maybe side stones or a design on the sides. I'll attach an inspiration pic, but I'd do more square/rectangle two-tone and diamonds on side.

My current ring is OEC 3 stone bezel with tiny stones [my avatar].
 

Attachments

  • setting.jpg
    setting.jpg
    27.7 KB · Views: 2
Last edited:
Dreamer_D said:
I also thought that one looked amazing. I wonder how big it is?
Click to expand...
it's just over 3 carats but just slightly larger than the 2.63 I posted above with measurements of 8.92x7.90x6.13 M and VS2. very good price so I could maybe surround it with diamonds to make it feel bigger. Of course I'd have to hope to get it.

It does have a strong blue florescence. Thoughts on that?

the 3.13 carat is 9.33x8.77x5.97 L VS2

Thanks!!

@K9
 
Fluorescence is very personal, I think. Betting it makes the stone face up much whiter. Jocelyn doesn’t normally sell stones that go milky with fluorescence. She has a great eye for that stuff.
 
K9 said:
Fluorescence is very personal, I think. Betting it makes the stone face up much whiter. Jocelyn doesn’t normally sell stones that go milky with fluorescence. She has a great eye for that stuff.
Click to expand...

I'm kindof excited about that one.
 
That setting is beautiful and I'm sure the difference in size is minimal. My bezel adds about 1.2mm to my stone.

My personal favourite is the 3.13ct. You'll know when a stone sings to you.
 
maryjane04 said:
That setting is beautiful and I'm sure the difference in size is minimal. My bezel adds about 1.2mm to my stone.

My personal favourite is the 3.13ct. You'll know when a stone sings to you.
Click to expand...

thank you!
 
Last edited:
I’m not concerned about Fluor it’s rare to cause issues and her video is in bright sunlight.
 
Cerulean said:
This looks like a repro setting. Like Erstwhile or Single Stone. It’s pretty tho. Diamond is lovely and looks antique

I’ve seen Maven Lane market things I’ve been highly skeptical of - eg she was selling a poorly cut MRB as a transitional a few years back and I tried to engage in a convo about it but …I have no way of knowing for sure but the GIA report didn’t make sense from memory

Click to expand...

Oh yeah-I remember this one! :lol-2:
 
TnTWalter said:
just saw this one. thank you it's pretty a little too much color for me but sparkly and love the price. do you recommend that shop? I'll add it to the list.
Click to expand...

I don't know them but returnable-sometimes it's worth a look...
 
Gilded lane has a pretty one on her preview. Tomorrow at 5 pm est it will be available.
 
I also love it. The stone literally is throwing the most beautiful glitter in that video. What a dancer that one is!
 
Ooh, that one. It actually glitters.
 
How does it compare to sakos 3.13? It will be less expensive.

Im hoping if it's meant for me, I'll get it.
 
TnTWalter said:
How does it compare to sakos 3.13? It will be less expensive.

Im hoping if it's meant for me, I'll get it.
Click to expand...

It’s lovely.

I don’t recall the 3.13 can you repost a link?
 
Dreamer_D said:
It’s lovely.

I don’t recall the 3.13 can you repost a link?
Click to expand...
It's LVS2 slightly larger not elongated no florescence and quite a bit more $

 
I love it! It'll be cheaper than the 3.13 L.. I'll be setting my alarm and jump on it if the price is right.

Basically it comes down to your preference in the faceting. Sako's one is more perfect/organised if that's what you're looking for and obviously a pillowy cushion that's 1:1.

Jocelyn's one is a little bit more chaotic but that's not necessarily a bad thing. I like the unpredictable because it's got more personality and you'll never be bored of looking at it. It's still a very pretty stone. I know you prefer the elongated shape as well so that's something you'll have to consider. I also think the fluorescence is really cool! Some people love it and some people don't. Lol better for the ones that love it though haha less competition.
 
Last edited:
As the 3.13 is gone, I am not sure I'd compare it to any new prospects. That said, I'll still do a little comparing. :)

The 3.13 was not really elongated and you did say you wanted elongated, so the 3.06 checks that box specifically.

Size-wise, the 3.06 has a footprint roughly .4mm and .7mm smaller. Once set, this is not going to be noticeable.

I personally don't mind fluorescence so that's a non-issue for me.

Beyond that, trust your eyes and what pleases them. The charm of these old cuts is that they behave so wildly different from one another. The 3.06 looks to have a lot of personality (I am also catching some kozibe in that video), but it's hard to tell with just the one video. A perspective shot on the hand will also help you (and I know she is good about adding those to her listings.)

Good luck!
 
maryjane04 said:
I love it! It'll be cheaper than the 3.13 L.. I'll be setting my alarm and jump on it if the price is right.

Basically it comes down to your preference in the faceting. Sako's one is more perfect/organised if that's what you're looking for and obviously a pillowy cushion that's 1:1.

Jocelyn's one is a little bit more chaotic but that's not necessarily a bad thing. I like the unpredictable because it's got more personality and you'll never be bored of looking at it. It's still a very pretty stone. I know you prefer the elongated shape as well so that's something you'll have to consider. I also think the fluorescence is really cool! Some people love it and some people don't. Lol better for the ones that love it though haha less competition.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure how I feel about florescence and chaos lol. Hopefully she'll post more videos.
 
Last edited:
K9 said:
As the 3.13 is gone, I am not sure I'd compare it to any new prospects. That said, I'll still do a little comparing. :)

The 3.13 was not really elongated and you did say you wanted elongated, so the 3.06 checks that box specifically.

Size-wise, the 3.06 has a footprint roughly .4mm and .7mm smaller. Once set, this is not going to be noticeable.

I personally don't mind fluorescence so that's a non-issue for me.

Beyond that, trust your eyes and what pleases them. The charm of these old cuts is that they behave so wildly different from one another. The 3.06 looks to have a lot of personality (I am also catching some kozibe in that video), but it's hard to tell with just the one video. A perspective shot on the hand will also help you (and I know she is good about adding those to her listings.)

Good luck!
Click to expand...

Thank you. My husband said the same about size. I saw the kozibe. I'm looking forward to more pics and vids.
 
It looks like a very pretty stone to me! It's the shape you want too. I'm not an expert at all but when I was looking the things that bothered me were darkness of the center facets and fisheyes and this diamond doesn't seem to have those. I don't think the florescence would bother me but it sounds like it's a factor that might help with your decision.

Shopping for antique diamonds is weird lol. It can be hard to pull the trigger. There's that feeling that maybe there's one out there that we'll like better. At the same time there's the worry that we're letting a good one get away! Agree with K9, a perspective shot on the hand will give you a better idea of the size.
 
junebug17 said:
It looks like a very pretty stone to me! It's the shape you want too. I'm not an expert at all but when I was looking the things that bothered me were darkness of the center facets and fisheyes and this diamond doesn't seem to have those. I don't think the florescence would bother me but it sounds like it's a factor that might help with your decision.

Shopping for antique diamonds is weird lol. It can be hard to pull the trigger. There's that feeling that maybe there's one out there that we'll like better. At the same time there's the worry that we're letting a good one get away! Agree with K9, a perspective shot on the hand will give you a better idea of the size.
Click to expand...

Thank you!
 
What does the 3.13 look like from the side?

I prefer Jocelyn’s stone based only on these videos.
 
Dreamer_D said:
What does the 3.13 look like from the side?

I prefer Jocelyn’s stone based only on these videos.
Click to expand...

I can't remember if I have a video of the side. I am leaning towards Jocelyn's too but probably so is everyone else. lol. fingers crossed!
 
TnTWalter said:
ok she posted. I'm grabbing it I think!! talk me down if needed....
Click to expand...

Congrats! It ticks all the boxes. Such a pretty and cool stone and faces up nice and white too. I think it would fit perfectly with that setting you had in mind.
 
maryjane04 said:
Congrats! It ticks all the boxes. Such a pretty and cool stone and faces up nice and white too. I think it would fit perfectly with that setting you had in mind.
Click to expand...

yay! thank you!
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Jewelry Blog
PriceScope-Concierge-Ad
Find prime cuts.
Top