iwannaprettyone
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2002
- Messages
- 3,684
Me too. The ladies have been their usual helpful selves, but we''ve missed our resident Photoshop whiz. Thanks!Date: 10/26/2007 3:50:24 PM
Author: iwannaprettyone
I found this...I''m in love...
http://www.artofplatinum.com/4images/details.php?image_id=276
You can''t beat my cellphone camera.Date: 10/28/2007 8:55:02 PM
Author: colormyworld
I''ll look if you post.
If you could just see my ''studio'' on the back patio surrounded by potted plants ang a grill. Using a ice chest for a table. Me leaning on a step ladder to steady myself so the pics are not blurry. I laugh every time I think about it.
DS, the other half is with you. He's been nixing any ring stone that's smaller than my diamond, which leaves me with earrings and pendants.Date: 10/28/2007 9:32:22 PM
Author: diamondseeker2006
I definitely think it needs a halo since emeralds are so soft. And a I think the emerald would look too small in a ring without a halo when she is wearing a 3.6 ct. diamond on the other hand.
I totally agree. Your emerald is lovely, and a setting like that COULD be made for it, as frequently that type of setting is used to enhance smaller white step cuts ( like a 5 x 5)... but I don''t think it will look that great with your 5 x 5 emerald. I still stand by my pendant suggestion. It would have visual impact, protect the stone as it''s not you your hands AND has a halo, plus on your neck it really stands out and doesn''t have to compete with that giant rock of yours.Date: 11/4/2007 6:22:12 PM
Author: Harriet
Gypsy, they''re both lovely, but I''m afraid my emerald is too small. Darn.
Date: 11/4/2007 10:18:24 PM
Author: Harriet
Gypsy,
It''s no diamond, but I thought you''d might like to see my danburite (courtesy of Jeff).
I love it! What are the dimensions? The cut looks fantastic!!Date: 11/4/2007 10:18:24 PM
Author: Harriet
Gypsy,
It''s no diamond, but I thought you''d might like to see my danburite (courtesy of Jeff).