- Aug 26, 2011
So it’s not good? I was reading thru your attached post.. this is the same issues?Same issue as this one here just not as bad.
I'm just as guilty as anyone. Helping someone find a stone and run across one with that 34.5/40.8 combo. You smile. You then run through the rest of the proportions.... 57 table, 61.7 depth, 75 LGF's, 50 stars and medium-slightly thick girdle....check, check, check,check and check You...www.pricescope.com
Thanks so much. They are only one color apart and low colors. I meant the ASETS look the same to me. I really don’t know around stones. I’m just helping someone. I think he’ll go with the last one you said looked good. What are your thoughts on the inclusions of this stone? Thank you again!!!!This last aset you posted is good. What looks identical to you? The stones or the Asets?
Edit...lower color can look brighter face up when it is well cut when compared to a stone that is not well-cut. However, there is no way to judge
these two stones against each other. We dont even know the colors.
You're very welcome.Yes. That’s the one! Thank you so much. I am going to tel him to reserve it! I’ll also ask for them to look at it! I truly appreciate all the help. My friend is also!
You're very welcome.
Once reserved, be sure to post a link to the stone so the others invested in this thread can see it as well.
Not sure how it compares dollar wise to the first stone, but this baby is going to way outperform the first stone. Your friend should be very happy.
[/https://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-4024623.htm. I reserved it! Thank you again! Lmk your thoughts. They are going to lmk if a high or low K! Also- conforming eye clean. You guys are the best. I hope this is the one for him!