ice empress
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2013
- Messages
- 436
Hello all,
Please let me first begin by sincerely thanking all of you for being so generously candid, friendly, and well-informed!!
I have only recently become acquainted with Pricescope (having gotten engaged 4 months ago), and have been so deeply impressed with the wealth of knowledge that seems to be commonplace amongst its members. More impressive still is the readiness with which all you ladies (and men) share your successes, failures, insight, and experiences with each other! Thank you!!
I have been especially interested in those posts dedicated to the resetting of solitaires to halos, as I am currently in the midst of re-designing the setting for my engagement diamond (1.7ct RB, colour F, VS1-2). Unfortunately, my local jeweller needs a fair bit of direction, so I am keen to be as vigilant, explicit, non-ambiguous and detail-oriented as possible. Admittedly, I am a perfectionist, but I have seen some of his pieces turn out with discontinuous lines and asymmetries (especially obvious to someone with a keen eye... and minor OCD...). As such, I have read and re-read (more times than I would care to admit...) the posts discussing and displaying halo rings, most notably the Victor Canera Emilya.
I have noticed that VC has set the melée stones in the Emilya in at least 3 different fashions, to accommodate for the space the prongs take up on/around the halo where they originate off the halo. All three varieties seem to blend seamlessly with one another, as well as with the centre stone, with little/no airline or excessive metal. Still, I was hoping someone could help shed some light on the pros and cons of the different options, so I could choose one for my own setting. Also, which is most likely to be least difficult to execute well (e.g. with a perfectly circular halo and least evident melée/metal difference)?
Option 1 - Melée stones exactly the same width, thin metal gap/line between the stones where the prong sits
- e.g. Frankiextah, mom2boys
- also, where does the prong sit exactly? completely on the halo (as opposed to half off, within the inner diameter of the halo, i.e. the space)? is the prong diameter smaller to make this possible?
Option 2 - Melé stones exactly the same width, no metal gap between the stones where the prongs sit
- e.g. susimoo, phdecorate, soxfan
- is there a larger airline that I am just not seeing, and/or the prongs originate almost completely off/within the halo?
Option 3 - Melée stone smaller where the prong sits
-e.g. bhmom, bright ice
- this is the usual option my jeweler uses, but I worry because the smaller melées definitely don't blend and are obviously different
I apologize for the very lengthy post... once I got started, I couldn't stop! Also, I assure you... I am not crazy... I am just very worried that the jeweller will not produce a "flowing" elegant halo (having seen some of his previous work).
Thank you for your help!!!
Please let me first begin by sincerely thanking all of you for being so generously candid, friendly, and well-informed!!
I have only recently become acquainted with Pricescope (having gotten engaged 4 months ago), and have been so deeply impressed with the wealth of knowledge that seems to be commonplace amongst its members. More impressive still is the readiness with which all you ladies (and men) share your successes, failures, insight, and experiences with each other! Thank you!!
I have been especially interested in those posts dedicated to the resetting of solitaires to halos, as I am currently in the midst of re-designing the setting for my engagement diamond (1.7ct RB, colour F, VS1-2). Unfortunately, my local jeweller needs a fair bit of direction, so I am keen to be as vigilant, explicit, non-ambiguous and detail-oriented as possible. Admittedly, I am a perfectionist, but I have seen some of his pieces turn out with discontinuous lines and asymmetries (especially obvious to someone with a keen eye... and minor OCD...). As such, I have read and re-read (more times than I would care to admit...) the posts discussing and displaying halo rings, most notably the Victor Canera Emilya.
I have noticed that VC has set the melée stones in the Emilya in at least 3 different fashions, to accommodate for the space the prongs take up on/around the halo where they originate off the halo. All three varieties seem to blend seamlessly with one another, as well as with the centre stone, with little/no airline or excessive metal. Still, I was hoping someone could help shed some light on the pros and cons of the different options, so I could choose one for my own setting. Also, which is most likely to be least difficult to execute well (e.g. with a perfectly circular halo and least evident melée/metal difference)?
Option 1 - Melée stones exactly the same width, thin metal gap/line between the stones where the prong sits
- e.g. Frankiextah, mom2boys
- also, where does the prong sit exactly? completely on the halo (as opposed to half off, within the inner diameter of the halo, i.e. the space)? is the prong diameter smaller to make this possible?
Option 2 - Melé stones exactly the same width, no metal gap between the stones where the prongs sit
- e.g. susimoo, phdecorate, soxfan
- is there a larger airline that I am just not seeing, and/or the prongs originate almost completely off/within the halo?
Option 3 - Melée stone smaller where the prong sits
-e.g. bhmom, bright ice
- this is the usual option my jeweler uses, but I worry because the smaller melées definitely don't blend and are obviously different
I apologize for the very lengthy post... once I got started, I couldn't stop! Also, I assure you... I am not crazy... I am just very worried that the jeweller will not produce a "flowing" elegant halo (having seen some of his previous work).
Thank you for your help!!!