Date: 10/30/2009 9:19:20 AM
Author: niks28
GLS - I think we have a similar setting.... If only I could figure out how to resize my photos I would show mine off!
Would love to see it!!! Upload upload!
Date: 10/30/2009 9:19:20 AM
Author: niks28
GLS - I think we have a similar setting.... If only I could figure out how to resize my photos I would show mine off!
Date: 10/31/2009 5:11:43 AM
Author: Londongirl1
I think there are people here in the uk who can afford larger diamonds but the culture here is different and it''s not all about how big your diamond is. Some women here prefer sapphires and more subtle stones.
Having said that I love my bling courtesy of my American FI. My Fi surprised me this week by saying that I can upgrade my .50 ct studs as my Christmas present - I can''t imagine my English ex coming up with that idea all by himself![]()
Date: 10/27/2009 12:54:31 PM
Author: shimmer
Blackberry, great idea!!! This thread is awesome, thanks to everyone who has contributed!
Well, I don''t know if I should contribute as I''m just north of the border, Canada.
Where I live now, I would say the most popular erings are princess cut solitaires, in WG, 1/2 ct or less. I live in a small town in the prairies (in a Little House....lol...ETA man I hope someone gets this reference?!). When I had my 0.8 ACA I got comments such as ''Wow, that''s huge'' (from a man!) or ''you need a support to lift your hand'' haha. Now I''m going for a 1.3 cushion, so I probably won''t wear it out too much until I move to a bigger city.
I used to live in Vancouver (ETA. large-ish city on west coast) and RBs are way more popular there, the largest I saw was probably 1.5-2 ct, average about or just under 1ct (I was much younger and not too into jewelry yet). White metals are very popular.
ETA: I was recently in Banff, a resort town in the mountains and the server at a restaurant had a gorgeous 1/4-1/2 ct marquise in a very modern looking yellow-gold solitaire (Caleb Meyer-esque). I LOVED it.
I do not really meet the criterion to participate in this thread since I am not, "not from the States". My fiancé, now husband, was, however "not from the States", and we were living in France when we became engaged. We also had no money. So when we bought this ring in his home town in Italy, I suspect that it was probably not too far off from what his friends had bought...but I may be mistaken. This was in 1977.
Date: 10/26/2009 7:35:49 PM
Author:blackberry16
I have been reading some threads recently that focused on the differences between e-rings in the United States and the rest of the world. I am interested in actually seeing the e-rings belonging to ladies who are not from the states. Please show us your ring and share the cultural differences that you see between where you are from and the US. I am excited to learn more about other people's ideas and traditions!
Date: 10/31/2009 10:48:16 AM
Author: merrymunky
Date: 10/31/2009 5:11:43 AM
Author: Londongirl1
I think there are people here in the uk who can afford larger diamonds but the culture here is different and it''s not all about how big your diamond is. Some women here prefer sapphires and more subtle stones.
Having said that I love my bling courtesy of my American FI. My Fi surprised me this week by saying that I can upgrade my .50 ct studs as my Christmas present - I can''t imagine my English ex coming up with that idea all by himself![]()
You may have a point there I gues!
notice a trend with generations too here in the UK. Most younger people have diamond rings, but a lot of older popele have gemstone e.rings. My mother''s is a 2 stone sapphire ring surrounded by tiny diamonds. A lady at work has a beautiful emerald ring. Very classic with diamonds around it. Only one girl my age at work went for somethng other than diamond and her ring is to die for.
It''s a custom made tiffany legacy style ring with aquamarine centrestone and diamond halo and set shoulders. It''s absolutely stunning and large too by comparison to my own ring. Of the people I notice at work, my diamond is actually on the larger side! Crazy because it is still onlt .33 ct.
Date: 10/31/2009 10:53:46 AM
Author: Sensoryjunkie
In France, the tradition of the engagement ring is coming back although the ''rocks'' are by no means as big as those on PS! It usually is a small colored stone or at the very very max a diamond with no more than 0.25 CTW with a poor diamond quality. It is very common not to have an engagement ring. Actually I would say that a majority of married women do not wear an engagement ring.
When my husband proposed to me I didn''t want an engagement ring as I didn''t want to be seen as wearing a bling. But then I thought ''hey it''s a gift, I would be stupid to refuse a sparkling gift!''So now I have a 0.52 F VVS1 round diamond engagement ring with a diamond-encrusted tapered band (0.75 CTW) and it''s considered like a rock in France. I live in Ireland and this size seems to be slightly on the plus size (I would say it''s more around the 0.3 average).![]()
I see bigger diamonds here in Ireland (but never more than 1.5carat) but the quality is not there with grey-ish or yellow-ish diamonds + sometimes small black dots.
Although I love looking at big rocks on PS, I don''t think I will upgrade as I''m not sure if I can walk around with more $$$ on the finger that I already haveI will be too afraid to lose a finger!!
Or if I do upgrade that would be in no more than a carat.![]()
Date: 10/31/2009 11:39:30 AM
Author: shimmer
Date: 10/27/2009 12:54:31 PM
Author: shimmer
Blackberry, great idea!!! This thread is awesome, thanks to everyone who has contributed!
Well, I don''t know if I should contribute as I''m just north of the border, Canada.
Where I live now, I would say the most popular erings are princess cut solitaires, in WG, 1/2 ct or less. I live in a small town in the prairies (in a Little House....lol...ETA man I hope someone gets this reference?!). When I had my 0.8 ACA I got comments such as ''Wow, that''s huge'' (from a man!) or ''you need a support to lift your hand'' haha. Now I''m going for a 1.3 cushion, so I probably won''t wear it out too much until I move to a bigger city.
I used to live in Vancouver (ETA. large-ish city on west coast) and RBs are way more popular there, the largest I saw was probably 1.5-2 ct, average about or just under 1ct (I was much younger and not too into jewelry yet). White metals are very popular.
ETA: I was recently in Banff, a resort town in the mountains and the server at a restaurant had a gorgeous 1/4-1/2 ct marquise in a very modern looking yellow-gold solitaire (Caleb Meyer-esque). I LOVED it.
Here''s my ring! 1.3 J SI1 OMC.
Shimmer: I love the look of a classic set like yours!
Date: 10/31/2009 3:59:03 AM
Author: swedish bean
So all groups of people take the subway? even really wealthy people???? So strange to me.
Date: 10/28/2009 11:22:42 PM
Author: arjunajane
Date: 10/28/2009 2:28:26 PM
Author: justginger
A very fair question about value/cost, waterlily. Each economy seems to have things that are disproportionately more/less expensive than similar things in other economies.
Yup, Waterlily, Just Ginger and Hihowareyou are correct.
It seems to have nothing to do with exchange rates or standard pricing.
The higher cost of diamonds also goes for precious metals here.
For example, the sapphire ring (plat and diamonds) I am having made at the moment by BGD -
the average quotes from Aussie vendors for the same setting were at least 20 - 30% more expensive (and this is taking exchange rates, shipping and import tax into consideration).
Infact, a number of vendors were even ~40% more expensive than Leon Mege, who is considered one of the pricier vendors around PS![]()
I don''t want to even know what it would''ve cost me to buy the actual sapphire here, lol..
Infact, it costs me a small fortune to insure my US jewellery purchases - because AU Insurance Co''s insist on a local appraisal and replacement value - so there is this huge local markup that is tacked on top of my premiums, even though I will not be replacing locally if anything may happen - can''t figure that one out!
I''ve always found this disparity odd. As in, alot of the diamonds are mined in Australia, right here in Just Ginger''s and my state..I always thought that should at least lower the price a lil, right? who knows!
As long as the exchange rate stays above 75-80c, it is *always* cheaper for me to buy gems & jewellery from the US.
JG, interesting comparison of other consumer products - I did not know this (except for the cigs and beer).
Another reason to relocate to the US me thinks![]()
My mother is a doctor and wears small engagement ring with two little diamonds. There are a multitude of reasons why she has that ring. In Australia in the 70''s large diamonds were not popular, my father is an accountant, but also a smaller ring is more practical when constantly washing hands, putting on and removing gloves, etc. The only two rings my mother has ever worn are her wedding and engagement rings and both are understated pieces.Date: 10/31/2009 8:50:54 PM
Author: swl
I know this is about erings from outside of the states, but I also noticed something else that''s very interesting in my city-Boston, MA. Many of the professors and doctors that I encountered have less than 1 carat diamond rings and often just a plain gold band (maybe they leave their huge engagement rings at home?) I don''t know if it''s because they present a kind and knowledgeable image, their smaller diamond rings look so elegant and so precious. I am sure this is a personal choice, including professionals, but this totally changed my idea of ''the bigger the better''![]()
does anyone think a smaller diamond (ring) seems to be more precious?
Date: 10/29/2009 10:54:38 PM
Author: blackberry16
Date: 10/29/2009 9:50:43 PM
Author: Dancing Fire
BB...you ain't even closeDate: 10/29/2009 9:05:07 PM
Author: blackberry16
This is true. The average diamond size in the US is only .38 carats, I think people just assume there are more large diamonds because of celebrities and the fact that many of the people who travel abroad tend to be wealthy anyway. I have a 1.11 carat diamond and I rarely see anyone with a bigger stone than mine even the affluent mothers of my students. The idea of upgrading doesn't really seem to be that popular even with in my age group (mid 20's) except among people with a real passion for diamond rings.![]()
avg in the U.S....1ct
avg PS......1.27ct
avg NYC....2.75ct
avg No.Ca & So.Ca.......2.5ct
avg in the mid west....70ct
Actually I have read several report stating the .38 data that I just shared. And I wasn't talking about any specific place in the US. Perhaps you should come up with a nice way to correct people. And since neither of us has polled every person in the country statistics are just statistics and may not be exact! I was sharing some information that I have read and some opinions of my own.
I think this is the case in Australia too. The quality you get locally isn''t nearly as good as it could be, at the ''good stores'' buyers get pressured into top clarity or colour grades but never really have cut explained to them or understand what they should be looking for. At the other stores buyers have nothing explained to them and end up paying way too much for low colour/clarity and poorly cut stones.Date: 11/1/2009 1:24:15 AM
Author: Pandora II
- One reason I think Brits don''t spend a lot on rocks is that they worry about being scammed. Too much unknown in diamonds.
I agree, it''s down to knowledge of the consumer when it comes to diamonds and I see that a lot here in the UK.Date: 11/1/2009 1:24:15 AM
Author: Pandora II
Few extra points:
One reason I think Brits don''t spend a lot on rocks is that they worry about being scammed. Too much unknown in diamonds.
I've actually made a couple of good friends of jewellers here. I think some jewellers in the UK really enjoy talking to people about diamonds, beyond "it's big and shiny, buy it."Date: 11/1/2009 3:00:45 AM
Author: Po10472
I agree, it's down to knowledge of the consumer when it comes to diamonds and I see that a lot here in the UK.Date: 11/1/2009 1:24:15 AM
Author: Pandora II
Few extra points:
One reason I think Brits don't spend a lot on rocks is that they worry about being scammed. Too much unknown in diamonds.
Date: 10/31/2009 3:12:16 PM
Author: Lew Lew
Date: 10/31/2009 3:59:03 AM
Author: swedish bean
So all groups of people take the subway? even really wealthy people???? So strange to me.
Maybe some spent so much money on their engagement/wedding rings that they can no longer afford the car and driver.![]()
All kidding aside, this thread is very interesting. I love learning about the different cultures, particularly with respect to engagements and weddings.
Date: 11/1/2009 4:05:22 PM
Author: sba771
Also in relation to the topic at hand I am an American living in Germany, most people wear plain bands- eyeballing it I would say the few engagement rings I have seen are a half carat or less. When I go to Cartier they do not have many engagement rings displayed.
Date: 10/31/2009 4:58:49 AM
Author: arjunajane
Date: 10/31/2009 3:59:03 AM
Author: swedish bean
So all groups of people take the subway? even really wealthy people???? So strange to me.
really? Can you elaborate why you find it strange?
I would have thought the above, re. taking the train as a matter of convenience and not wealth, applies pretty much everywhere - at least it does where I live in Australia, and I''m positive our worst traffic is nothing compared to NYC!
I will qualify that I''m referring to travel to work and back, not ''non-essential'' travel.
Okay, sorry for t/jacking!