- Joined
- Nov 3, 2009
- Messages
- 7,589
Do you realize that you've contradicted yourself here? A free lunch is part of the ways to "show [young kids] a more secure life than what they live presently", that they can get a meal, maybe their only meal, so they can focus on learning instead of on hunger.
You support education but are against welfare. But don't you see that both and more (housing, child care, equal opportunity / equal pay, living wage, job training, etc...) are needed to move people out of entrenched poverty? How does a mother work when there's no one to take care of her child? How does a child learn that hard work and education pay off when he doesn't see it in his day to day existence? How does a student focus on school when he doesn't have a place to live?
You say your family came to the US from China with nothing and made something of yourselves. But you were lucky to have come in the 60's, a time when there was still great social mobility -- when there wasn't a chasm between a poor school and a rich school, when simply being smart gets one into a good college, when poor kids didn't have to compete against kids with test preps/consultants/extra tutoring. One can argue that a poor family in the US now faces a bigger, steeper, rougher mountain to climb while having to start from a deeper hole. Giving up on programs because a few abuse the system also abandons those who wish to do better.
I would put it in a more simple way. While there are people who abuse the system, they are adults, not kids. Among adults, there are some who really struggle, and some who merely repeat their mothers' path. But the kids who were brought into this world - surely they are not abusing anything? We can not punish them by hunger even if their parents are less-than-perfect citizens. We can not send the message to "welfare moms" to stop having kids by starving the ones they have. We are not Third World country.
(And then, the message that the government sends is very strange indeed. On the one hand, don't have kids irresponsibly, on the other, we are not going to cover your oral contraceptives and we are going to shut down PP).