breanne
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2016
- Messages
- 510
First of many videos to compare, so far, it appears the centre is not performing as well. Thoughts?
2 videos
2 videos
Prefer the one in the straight tweezers by a hair based on the videos.
I’m more curious about what’s wrong with the one in the center. Is it the cut or the material? That’s a huge difference that shows up even on video.
I’m so confused. If it looks so dead compared with the others in any lighting I wouldn’t pick it.
The one with straight tweezers is the one that was in the centre!
Also - I uploaded a video below it in a different location. Do you still think the centre one performs less in that one?
3.01 E SI1
40.6/35/56
15.5% crown height
H&A designation
3.02 F VS2
40.7/34.9/56.5
15% crown height
...no H&A designation
3.22 F VS1
40.7/35.1/57.5
15% crown height
...no H&A designation
@Karl_K
I'm confused. The center one looked much worse in video, so why is it under consideration?
In the video with all 3, the one on the left is my favorite
Is that the order from left to right in the video?
Is the center one totally clean (no dirt or oils)?
I'm confused. The center one looked much worse in video, so why is it under consideration?
In the video with all 3, the one on the left is my favorite
You did pick it, the one that was considered 'dead' is the one with the straight tweezers.
So, the second video I posted, where all three are lined up, I moved locations. You now see that the centre stone does perform a bit better there.
I think they are not at the same angle -- meaning the vertical axes are not parallel. And/or: they are not all at the same angle relative to the imaging plane (the phone's sensor). It looks like they are being compared side-by-side under identical conditions but it is likely that they are not.
Ok let me clarify my comment. Based on your videos, there are at least 2 different lighting setups. The line up with 3 diamonds and the 2 diamonds in tweezers.
Given that the center diamond looks visibly worse even on video, I would not consider it even if it edges out the others in other lighting. I’m still curious about what’s wrong with it because it’s uncommon to see such huge difference on video.
Can you do some videos in indirect natural light tomorrow? Maybe under a leafy tree?
When one looks worse change the order repeat test.
Did the problem follow the stone or stray in the same position?
Im not seeing somehing that screams this one bad, but I'm not seeing something that sreams this one is the best either.
When one looks worse change the order repeat test.
Did the problem follow the stone or stray in the same position?
Im not seeing somehing that screams this one bad, but I'm not seeing something that sreams this one is the best either.
I did that yesterday with the fire video, and the lack of fire did follow the stone. However, that stone shows more 'white' face up in other lighting conditions.
I don't know how to interpret that information, is it just a matter of preference, or is the whiter face up 'better' in performance.
Let me see if I can get another video going.
Most people prefer fire to "white" wirh less fire.