2 Carat Showdown: Opulence Oval vs AVC vs AVR - With Pictures!

[prbaglady]

I am now thinking of settings and am liking CVB’s Giselle and some of her other Art Deco inspired rings. There was one with French cut step sides that is also really pretty and belonged to a PSer:



Or, maybe something like this vintage ring that I had saved in my inspiration folder:


How do people decide? It’s really difficult. Trying to figure out which option would work best with the diamond...

 

[missy]

@prbaglady both settings are lovely and romantic. I think my eye prefers the second one for your stone depending on the look you are going for. Both are gorgeous. The second one imo being more flowy and soft and romantic. The first one is edgier and more impactful if that makes sense. Love them both for different reasons. It’s what fits you best personality and aesthetic wise. A great decision either way.

 

[prbaglady]

@missy I know that I want something besides a simple solitaire that is unique, has a vintage feel, adds lots of sparkle and interest to the sides, gives a little bit of extra finger coverage, and has an Art Deco feel.

The second one is intriguing because I haven’t seen another ring quite like it and it’s interesting while still looking delicate. I just want to make sure it won’t appear too busy or somehow make the stone look smaller. Seriously how do people decide?! The third one that I am interested in is the CVB Giselle:

I like the idea of small accent stones on the sides that provide that extra sparkle, plus the engraving is so pretty.

I wish I could somehow see all of these options in person before deciding.

 

[missy]

QUOTE="prbaglady, post: 4287170, member: 26354"]@missy I know that I want something besides a simple solitaire that is unique, has a vintage feel, adds lots of sparkle and interest to the sides, gives a little bit of extra finger coverage, and has an Art Deco feel.

The second one is intriguing because I haven’t seen another ring quite like it and it’s interesting while still looking delicate. I just want to make sure it won’t appear too busy or somehow make the stone look smaller. Seriously how do people decide?! The third one that I am interested in is the CVB Giselle:

I like the idea of small accent stones on the sides that provide that extra sparkle, plus the engraving is so pretty.

I wish I could somehow see all of these options in person before deciding.

It’s a difficult choice. Very. For the last setting I would prefer a step cut in that setting. It’s an elegant classic and timeless setting and I love it. I would love it best with a step cut however. Just my preference. No right or wrong here.

Personally I want the diamond/center stone to be the star of the show. Not everyone wants that. So it’s what do you prefer? For that second setting there’s something so fluid and flowy about it that appeals to me. But yeah it’s hard to know for sure unless you can see all your options set irl. I wonder if someone could tske the stone you have chosen and put them in each of the settings you are considering. And share the versions here. I think it’s called painting or something like that ?

Would that be helpful?

 

[prbaglady]

@missy Putting the stone digitally into the settings would be so helpful! I have no idea how to do that... is there an application I can use?

 

[missy]

@missy Putting the stone digitally into the settings would be so helpful! I have no idea how to do that... is there an application I can use?

There are PSers who know how to do this and that’s why I mentioned it. I don’t know the name of the app and I don’t remember who did this in another thread. Can anyone reading here help please?

 

[Gussie]

Sienna!!! It's gorgeous!

 

[Niel]

@missy Putting the stone digitally into the settings would be so helpful! I have no idea how to do that... is there an application I can use?

What stone do you want shopped on what settings? If you could post them in a new comment I can try to do that for you

 

[prbaglady]

Thank you so much @Niel !!

Here is the stone:

And here are the settings:

 

[Niel]

The one cvb is entirely too big for me to shoop any realistic image (I’m not very good, admittedly ) but here are the rest

 

[redwood66]

I love that AVC! Any of the setting you have chosen would be beautiful but I do like the ones with more oomph rather than the solitaire style. I know from my personal experience to make sure ahead of time. Though your tastes may change later.

 

[prbaglady]

Thank you Neil! That was actually really useful since it made me realize that none of these settings is quite right. I don’t know what it is, maybe they are too busy but they don’t seem to compliment the center stone. I like the idea of side stones for the extra bling factor and finger coverage—and because it will be worn without a band (and maybe move to my right hand eventually) and I like Art Deco, but can’t seem to settle on anything. Maybe it just needs to be in some sort of unique solitaire. I’ll keep looking for inspiration!

 

[prbaglady]

Thank you Neil! That was actually really useful since it made me realize that none of these settings is quite right. I don’t know what it is, maybe they are too busy but they don’t seem to compliment the center stone. I like the idea of side stones for the extra bling factor and finger coverage—and because it will be worn without a band (and maybe move to my right hand eventually) and I like Art Deco, but can’t seem to settle on anything. Maybe it just needs to be in some sort of unique solitaire or maybe a three stone. I’ll keep looking for inspiration!

 

[Starfacet]

When I get my huge AVC (like yours!!!) I want to set it into this:

 

[Niel]

Three stone

 

[prbaglady]

@Starfacet that is a great setting but I’m trying to stay away from large halos. I’m afraid that the ring would look too big on my finger (though a very minimal halo might be ok)

@Niel a three stone was one of my initial thoughts, I just don’t know what kind of three stone ring would look best. I would want the side stones to be smaller and more like accent stones so that the center stone could still shine. Any ideas?

 

[Niel]

@Starfacet that is a great setting but I’m trying to stay away from large halos. I’m afraid that the ring would look too big on my finger (though a very minimal halo might be ok)

@Niel a three stone was one of my initial thoughts, I just don’t know what kind of three stone ring would look best. I would want the side stones to be smaller and more like accent stones so that the center stone could still shine. Any ideas?

Ask Jon to pair some stones next to your stone I’m sure he would. Maybe half ct cushions, 30 point cushions and 30 point rounds a la Meghan Markle

I think you could get something with a hint of vintage with either a multi prong three stone or a bezel (which would be fab

 

[Niel]

I shooped your stone into msops three stone. The sides are 3.5mm and the stone is a little smaller than yours a 7*7.5
https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/gray-spinel-three-stone-by-dk.231258/

 

[Starfacet]

@prbaglady Jon has a pair of 70 pt. AVCs that I had thought about using for a 3 stone. You might want to ask him about them. Isn't your center stone a J?

 

[Starfacet]

https://www.augustvintageinc.com/co...-73ct-i-vvs2-august-vintage-cushion-brilliant

https://www.augustvintageinc.com/co...0-76ct-i-vs1-august-vintage-cushion-brilliant

 

[prbaglady]

@Niel I really like the three stone setting you photoshopped (thanks again for doing that!)!! I hadn't considered a bezel, or combining the cushion with small rounds, but this looks really well balanced, delicate and interesting. I was worried that the faceting of an round brilliant would look weird next to the faceting of the cushion, or that the rounds would look too white and bright next to the cushion, and detract from the center stone. Maybe if the rounds are OECs? I am going to look into this. I also need to see what adding .30-ish mm rounds would do to the budget.

I shooped your stone into msops three stone. The sides are 3.5mm and the stone is a little smaller than yours a 7*7.5
https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/gray-spinel-three-stone-by-dk.231258/

CVB made a version of the giselle with a slightly larger AVC for @JDDN that I have always loved. I would keep the shape and proportions of the side stones along with the double prongs but either:
- Add back in the engravings of the original and also maybe add milgrain around the side stones (a bit more vintage and more detail).
- do migrain around the sidetones and the pave shank, like @diamondseeker2006 stunning asscher
I know that many people say that the french cut sides don't go as well with a cushion ( I think JDDN mentioned that she preferred the setting in a step cut center), but it does look really pretty here!



It also seems like often I will see a three stone or five stone ring on Pricescope that I love, and the original owner ends up resetting the diamond after some time passes back into a solitaire, because they felt that the side stones took away from the diamond and the solitaire had more presence. This of course, scares me from committing to a three stone!

 

[Niel]

I’d try and get oec side stones to match the faceting of your center - but smaller sizes like that shouldn’t be too costly. I think you could definitely do prongs too if you were so inclined- but if you’re mixing round and cushion I like the bezels because it says “yes they are different shapes” vs prongs that can give off a “are those also cushions or no?” Look to them

 

[diamondseeker2006]

I am just now catching up on this thread! Will be back in a few minutes to give my thoughts!

First, oh my goodness.....

This is a threadjack...but I just have to say what a treasure diamondseeker is. She reads with care and analyzes the situation; keeps her eye on the ball; never forgets the consumer's concerns and priorities; and makes wise recommendations based on knowing diamonds and jewelry extremely well. I was never more impressed with her than in reading this thread.

You are so wonderful and giving, diamondseeker!

Hugs,
Deb

Deb, you are the sweetest! I can't thank you enough for those very generous words! {{{hugs!}}}

 

[diamondseeker2006]

Okay, I adore JDDN's AVC in the Giselle. The size of the french cuts is determined my the center stone, and Caysie has them custom cut to the right size. This means it takes longer, but it is so worth it. In addition, she could have Yoram cut 2 matching OEC sides if you went that route. Your stone would look great in any of Caysie's solitaires, too.

 

[Krisking]

It also seems like often I will see a three stone or five stone ring on Pricescope that I love, and the original owner ends up resetting the diamond after some time passes back into a solitaire, because they felt that the side stones took away from the diamond and the solitaire had more presence. This of course, scares me from committing to a three stone![/QUOTE]

@prbaglady, if you decide to go the solitaire route, I would love to see the settings you consider! Especially if they have the tapered-shank profile of the Giselle.

 

[diamondseeker2006]

Here are some random ideas even though I know you said you weren't looking at halos.




View attachment 612407

 

[prbaglady]

My husband just looked at all of my ideas for the ring and he said that the solitaires seemed like a better bet--he really liked the Sienna. He wasn't sure if it was worth it to increase the budget for a three stone with small OEC sides, or for the Giselle, given that the Sienna was so pretty and that so many three stones looked "off" to him. He might be right. A delicate solitaire would look lovely and be a safer bet.

Ugh. this is way too difficult. I give up!

 

[diamondseeker2006]

You are talking to someone here who has had her AVR in a plain solitaire for 4.5 years, so I am not a great person to give advice!

However, I am going to say, you are the one who will be looking at the ring all the time. Men generally do not have the same taste as women and really no one but you can judge what you love. So I am going to say to put his thoughts aside. Yes, you may have to work within a budget if he feels strongly about that. I respect couples making decisions based on finances. But he doesn't choose my clothes or my purses, or my jewelry. Because he can't know what I love.

Caysie has some gorgeous solitaires. Since this will be your e-ring, I have no problem with that idea. But you need to decide what you love!

 

[Niel]

My husband just looked at all of my ideas for the ring and he said that the solitaires seemed like a better bet--he really liked the Sienna. He wasn't sure if it was worth it to increase the budget for a three stone with small OEC sides, or for the Giselle, given that the Sienna was so pretty and that so many three stones looked "off" to him. He might be right. A delicate solitaire would look lovely and be a safer bet.

Ugh. this is way too difficult. I give up!

How much does he think 3.5 ish mm diamonds are? I can’t imagine they are much- it wouldn’t probably be less expensive than the settings you’re considering with all the pave.

A soli is always a good idea too.

Have you ever seen Leighton Meester‘s e ring?
It’s a soli but it has a little diamond cuff at the base of the shank where it meets the head. I love love it

 

[diamondseeker2006]

That ring is sooo pretty, Niel! I tried to find other pics but it is hard to see the details.