- Joined
- Aug 15, 2000
- Messages
- 18,883
I think you misunderstood me, Garry.
I'm very well aware that Moissanite holds certain advantages with those metrics, but double refraction and not being pure carbon crystal are characteristics that aren't typically desired by folks specifically wanting what diamond offers.
I'm all for Moissanite being readily available and an extremely cost effective alternative, especially given the optical characteristics seen by many as advantages, but my wife and I much prefer the "just right" appearance and optics of diamond over any other gemstone, especially the "sensory overload" of Moissy. The missus is also a huge fan of amethyst and emerald.
Ok, so it's just the Zircon fuzzy factor
Double refraction on steroids
