- Joined
- May 23, 2016
- Messages
- 1,722
I’m having cads drawn up for a pendant and I’ve asked a couple of times about the stone being set at a specific height. The designer has told me that cads can’t accurately reflect what the height of the stone within the setting will end up being as the setter will decide, on setting, how best to safely place the stone. I was really surprised and haven’t been told this before. I understand why a setter would need some leeway, but I’m not keen to sign off on cads that show the stone at a height that isn’t what I truly want? I don’t understand why the cads can’t depict the stone in my perfect position (assuming it’s physically possible), so the setter knows my ultimate aim? We’re ultimately talking about a difference of a couple of millimetres, so maybe it’s the blown up size of the drawings exacerbating it?
The height of the stone makes such a difference to a setting - I’ve seen pictures of rings I adore from the top view but that I actively dislike in profile, purely because the height of the setting is not my taste. It’s something so fundamental to whether you personally enjoy a setting.
If it makes a difference, the stone is a cab. I’ve only had stones with a girdle set before now, so maybe that has an impact that I’m not understanding?
The height of the stone makes such a difference to a setting - I’ve seen pictures of rings I adore from the top view but that I actively dislike in profile, purely because the height of the setting is not my taste. It’s something so fundamental to whether you personally enjoy a setting.
If it makes a difference, the stone is a cab. I’ve only had stones with a girdle set before now, so maybe that has an impact that I’m not understanding?