Yssie|1306294303|2929664 said:Huh. I am curious too!
There have been some *honkers* around here - I think MadRocks' oval might take the cake: 10.28 oval [URL='https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/the-forum-engagement-ring-folder-eye-candy.5429/page-39']https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/the-forum-engagement-ring-folder-eye-candy.5429/page-39[/URL] (last post on pg 39)
I believe she later upgraded to a 7.something EC..?
Kilops|1306293708|2929654 said:Topic speaks for itself
tradergirl|1306335878|2929883 said:Who cares? It could be 15 ct. and a chunk of frozen spit.
True, but since this thread is for "the biggest" as opposed to making cases for who has "the best" the quality if the stone isn't being taken into consideration... But you are absolutely right that the biggest may not be the most impressivetradergirl|1306335878|2929883 said:Who cares? It could be 15 ct. and a chunk of frozen spit.
by Garry H (Cut Nut) » 09 Mar 2005 19:18 Purrfffect - around 55%T, 34.5Crown and 40.7P from memory
But the H&A''s (I checked myself) and proportions and ideal-scope etc - all those ducks line up.
This stone has been certified AGS 0,0,000 and would definitely qualify as a candidate for thenew AGS 0 too.
Ok, how about I offer you a limerick (you can''t put a price on such poetry) Image
There once was a man named Garry,
Whom for that diamond I''d totally marry,
But he had a wife,
Oh bummer, that''s life,
But if I were her, I would be wary…
They were making him offers galore,
To bring home that rock from his store,
They begged and beguiled,
Patty offered a child,
Then told him she''d give him one more! Image
And with this thought I shall depart,
What PS''ers have said from the start:
While HUGE is quite nice
For a chunk of great ice
The ONE he gave you came deep from his heart. Image