- Joined
- Apr 30, 2005
- Messages
- 33,844
Date: 11/11/2006 10:02:49 PM
Author: shinythings
Here''s Madrock''s 10.28 ct oval!
Date: 11/12/2006 12:17:14 AM
Author: diamondfan
Date: 11/11/2006 10:02:49 PM
Author: shinythings
Here''s Madrock''s 10.28 ct oval!
She traded it and I think has a 7.32 emerald cut, set very similarly to mine with the baguettes. I think it looks so nice, though I am partial because it looks like my ring! I think she debated what to do with her setting, since it was a Leon and pricey...never know what she ended up doing!
Date: 11/13/2006 12:26:35 AM
Author: Mara
well the largest one posted here on PS i think was the 15c H&A that Garry posted a few years ago. i love that monster!!!! it was not set, he just had it in his hands. i don''t know if he sold it or what.
As much as I''d love (and happily wear!) a 10 carat ring, I think the problem for me is it just wouldn''t "match". I mean, I carry Coach bags and wear Banana Republic clothes... I live in a nice area but a small apartment... I''m a therapist/student and 27 years old. Anything over a few carats wouldn''t even be believable, much less attractive! I am far too bourgeois...Date: 11/13/2006 12:26:35 AM
Author: Mara
i seriously love me some big bling but anything over ~5c (and probably even then!!) looks fake to me. not like i''d toss it back if it landed in my lap.i think for me my dream size is probably that 5c ACA i tried on at WF. but i think that looked fake too! hehee.
Really? I translate those comments just as "it would look fake on ME" not "it looks fake on everyone who has one". Therefore not a judgment or backhanded anything... just an observation based on personal lifestyle!Date: 11/13/2006 9:34:01 AM
Author: *Lindsey*
The 'I love larger diamonds but I'd never want one because XYZ...or it looks fake' really seems like a backhanded compliment to the people who have posted in this thread and have larger diamonds. Believable or not, diamonds are diamonds, and shouldn't be meant solely to impress people, therefore it shouldn't matter if others think they're fake. If you wouldn't want something that someone else has, there's no need to announce it.
Thanks to the gorgeous pics thus far
Lindsey...not everything said has to have 'read between the lines' written on it. Personally I do think that many larger diamonds look fake. Some of which I have tried on at stores and drooled on. Do I care that some people on here have really large diamonds? No. Do I think some of them look fake in pictures. Yes. Would I wear one if thrown into my lap. SURE.Date: 11/13/2006 9:34:01 AM
Author: *Lindsey*
The 'I love larger diamonds but I'd never want one because XYZ...or it looks fake' really seems like a backhanded compliment to the people who have posted in this thread and have larger diamonds. Believable or not, diamonds are diamonds, and shouldn't be meant solely to impress people, therefore it shouldn't matter if others think they're fake. If you wouldn't want something that someone else has, there's no need to announce it.
Thanks to the gorgeous pics thus far
Well Sharon I''ve been wondering what happened to your gorgeous 5ct thread?Date: 11/13/2006 1:48:48 PM
Author: canuk-gal
HI:
Before buying my new ring, I tried on a 10 carat Assher and an 8 carat RB. Neither did I like, but I suspect that was due to the cut quality rather than size; because those large (quality) HW and Cartier stunners I tried on in Hawaii this summer, were TODIE4. At present I happily wear my ring, and although shrinkage has not yet set in I do not think it is ''too big''.
cheers--Sharon
what good is a 50 carat stone other than to sit on a pedistal behind bullet proof glass?Date: 11/13/2006 10:06:19 PM
Author: kenny
Thanks for all the pics and info folks.
I would imagine diamonds that are many times larger than we are used to seem ''authenticity-challenged'' but I imagine if you grew up in a socioeconomic class where 15 ct diamonds are the norm then 50+ ct stones only qualify as honkers or ''authenticity-challenged''.
There may even be people for whom 50 carat stones are the norm.
Not me.