Which of these ASET images are the best?
- Thread starter peperomia
- Start date
0.96 carat
Depth % 61.6
Table % 56.3
Crown Angle 34.6
Star 51.0
Pavilion Angle 40.6
Crown % 15.1
Lower Girdle % 76.0
HCA score 0.7
1.1 carat
Depth % 61.7
Table % 55.4
Crown Angle 34.6
Star 52.0
Pavilion Angle 40.7
Crown % 15.4
Lower Girdle % 76.0
HCA score 1.0
1.112 carat
Depth % 60.8
Table % 57.5
Crown Angle 34.1
Star 50.0
Pavilion Angle 40.7
Crown % 14.4
Lower Girdle % 77.0
HCA score 0.9
All three have same color, clarity, and cut grade (AGS 000).
Depth % 61.6
Table % 56.3
Crown Angle 34.6
Star 51.0
Pavilion Angle 40.6
Crown % 15.1
Lower Girdle % 76.0
HCA score 0.7
1.1 carat
Depth % 61.7
Table % 55.4
Crown Angle 34.6
Star 52.0
Pavilion Angle 40.7
Crown % 15.4
Lower Girdle % 76.0
HCA score 1.0
1.112 carat
Depth % 60.8
Table % 57.5
Crown Angle 34.1
Star 50.0
Pavilion Angle 40.7
Crown % 14.4
Lower Girdle % 77.0
HCA score 0.9
All three have same color, clarity, and cut grade (AGS 000).
Im not an expert on images so can't comment on that but others will chime in soon and offer opinions. I like the numberS on the second diamond 1.1 carat but if the price difference between the first and second diamond is alot I would choose the diamond just under 1 carat. They are all AGS 000 so the cut will be excellent on all 3 just comes down to numbers and price.
Thank you for commenting. The second one (1.1 carat) has sort of a messy (the scattered colors around the edges of the hearts) in the second ASET image showing hearts, compared to the other two diamonds and I am not sure if that is something I need to be concerned about and was hoping someone good at reading these images could help me out.
Thank you for commenting. The second one (1.1 carat) has sort of a messy (the scattered colors around the edges of the hearts) in the second ASET image showing hearts, compared to the other two diamonds and I am not sure if that is something I need to be concerned about and was hoping someone good at reading these images could help me out.
@Karl_K would be the expert to help you with the images.
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2004
- Messages
- 33,852
These are computer generated images not the actual images of the stones. Ask the vendor if they can provide the actual images.Thank you for commenting. The second one (1.1 carat) has sort of a messy (the scattered colors around the edges of the hearts) in the second ASET image showing hearts, compared to the other two diamonds and I am not sure if that is something I need to be concerned about and was hoping someone good at reading these images could help me out.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2008
- Messages
- 28,177
You're dealing with Super Ideal branded stones. They will all be well-cut because they are vetted in order to make the ACA line. If you want a lower level
of analysis, you should call WF and have them talk you through the stones and tell you the difference between the 3.
I personally would go with the largest in my budget unless WF gave me a good reason not to. All the same color, all the same clarity, no glaring
inclusions...the only thing to really differentiate them is the size and cost. You know what is most important to you (budget or size...no wrong answer)
Relative size difference between the 1.11 and the .96 on size 6 finger, 2mm shank.
of analysis, you should call WF and have them talk you through the stones and tell you the difference between the 3.
I personally would go with the largest in my budget unless WF gave me a good reason not to. All the same color, all the same clarity, no glaring
inclusions...the only thing to really differentiate them is the size and cost. You know what is most important to you (budget or size...no wrong answer)
Relative size difference between the 1.11 and the .96 on size 6 finger, 2mm shank.
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2008
- Messages
- 15,672
Thank you for the feedback. I'll just look at the price and size and make my decision then. Thank you for including the pictures. They are helpful.
300x240.png)