- Joined
- Sep 20, 2008
- Messages
- 25,228
LovingDiamonds|1319233273|3045020 said:Mmmmmm this is a tough one.
The Emerald doesn't look right somehow. I think it's because the clarity is so different from the Mahenges so your eye is drawn to the side stones not the Emerald which I don't think it should be.
The mint tourmaline, square and round chrysos are all disproportionate in size (too small) so again, I don't think are right.
The cab looks a good size and has nice proportions and holds its own against the side stones (because of it's size). If I had to choose it would be this one but ................. another thought ..............
Do you have another stone with great clarity (like the square chryso for example)? I think a bigger stone with great clarity will be a great balance.
NKOTB|1319253612|3045258 said:Out of these, I like the round chryso best, but I'd like to see a picture of the violet tourm with the spinels.![]()
TL|1319246580|3045195 said:LovingDiamonds|1319233273|3045020 said:Mmmmmm this is a tough one.
The Emerald doesn't look right somehow. I think it's because the clarity is so different from the Mahenges so your eye is drawn to the side stones not the Emerald which I don't think it should be.
The mint tourmaline, square and round chrysos are all disproportionate in size (too small) so again, I don't think are right.
The cab looks a good size and has nice proportions and holds its own against the side stones (because of it's size). If I had to choose it would be this one but ................. another thought ..............
Do you have another stone with great clarity (like the square chryso for example)? I think a bigger stone with great clarity will be a great balance.
I have a 7 carat cushion cuprian tourmaline in a violet color. It's 10x10mm and these trillions are around 5.2 mm each.
TL|1319324363|3045602 said: