- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 10,413
Garry H (Cut Nut)|1416373650|3786232 said:Back to the topic.
There have been many good answers posted, and most of them are on the money.
Mainly the interest from the cut geeks in the trade bought us all here, and still does.
From time to time when a prosumer helping a consumer newbie needs some help with a tricky question they will send any one of many of us an email. I had one on Sunday, to come and assist on a tricky question.
We do consider it important that the information provided is not inaccurate.
Is it bad?
Is Pricescope broken?
I don't think so, but it has evolved and is a little different, as have the tastes of many of the diamond lovers who have moved into fancy shapes and old cut styles as one example.
Could we find ways to help the poor guys who lurk (we estimate that maybe 1/100 actually post a question) here trying to get the lady they are about to propose to the best looking diamond on their X months salary and savings. I think the answer is YES.
One of my pet hates is that the Amazonins of the world have introduced cookie based trailing commissions that have spawned all sorts of websites that help us find places to spend our money. Sometimes these are review sites that really do add value, many of the travel related sites seem to do a great job. I have grave reservations about this in the diamond buying world however - not only based on current practices - but also how this might evolve over time. I have no doubt about the good intentions of Bezos and Amazon, but I doubt they will survive in the upcoming Alibaba battle. That whole secret commission referral business ............
Anyway, we have a community here. I have been here since 1999, well before the forums began. Its a wonderful and supportive place with great get togethers, happy advertisers and listing suppliers and good behavior abundant (even David and my battles have not precluded us from working together in the offline world).
Will PS be the same in the next decade? Surely not. Will it be better? I hope so.
Which part DS? That these companies that use cookies to give undeclared commissions that mean we pay more for goods?diamondseeker2006|1416377489|3786253 said:Garry H (Cut Nut)|1416373650|3786232 said:Back to the topic.
There have been many good answers posted, and most of them are on the money.
Mainly the interest from the cut geeks in the trade bought us all here, and still does.
From time to time when a prosumer helping a consumer newbie needs some help with a tricky question they will send any one of many of us an email. I had one on Sunday, to come and assist on a tricky question.
We do consider it important that the information provided is not inaccurate.
Is it bad?
Is Pricescope broken?
I don't think so, but it has evolved and is a little different, as have the tastes of many of the diamond lovers who have moved into fancy shapes and old cut styles as one example.
Could we find ways to help the poor guys who lurk (we estimate that maybe 1/100 actually post a question) here trying to get the lady they are about to propose to the best looking diamond on their X months salary and savings. I think the answer is YES.
One of my pet hates is that the Amazonins of the world have introduced cookie based trailing commissions that have spawned all sorts of websites that help us find places to spend our money. Sometimes these are review sites that really do add value, many of the travel related sites seem to do a great job. I have grave reservations about this in the diamond buying world however - not only based on current practices - but also how this might evolve over time. I have no doubt about the good intentions of Bezos and Amazon, but I doubt they will survive in the upcoming Alibaba battle. That whole secret commission referral business ............
Anyway, we have a community here. I have been here since 1999, well before the forums began. Its a wonderful and supportive place with great get togethers, happy advertisers and listing suppliers and good behavior abundant (even David and my battles have not precluded us from working together in the offline world).
Will PS be the same in the next decade? Surely not. Will it be better? I hope so.
Hi, Garry! Could you please explain the part in bold? I am not familiar with that story. Do you mean that Amazon might go out of business???
Diamond2014|1416379665|3786267 said:diamondseeker2006,
Maybe I can answer your question about the affiliated cookies since my past was computer related. When you Google something like "Electric Heater", Google will remember your IP address and affiliated words you have searched "Electric Heater". After that, every time you go to ANY website using any computer inside your house that use the same IP address, you'll see advertisement on the top or right side or left side of any website such as Walmart ads for electric heater. You go to Amazon.com and you'll see how Amazon.com bring up electric heaters in your front page. Then you log into your Facebook and somehow you see Facebook also inserted an online retailer with a similar model of electric heater into your news Facebook news feeds.
Facebook and Google was suppose to be viral but somewhere along the line, they secretly settled a treaty and decided to share information with each others. So things you search on Google will pretty much be shared with all other retailers out there and those retailers ALREADY know exactly what you're looking for. All ads you see on many websites are Google Ads where the owner of the website get paid when someone click on it.
THAT is what Garry hate about going online. Cant really escape it though.
Lula|1416366317|3786178 said:Chrono|1416336638|3785865 said:diamondseeker2006|1416334821|3785845 said:In terms of cut in regard to fancy shapes, I actually prefer the fact that Jonathan of GOG stopped spending time here debating and moved on to designing and producing well cut fancy shape diamonds (in addition to the well cut lines he already carried). That has a LOT more benefit to consumers, in my opinion.
It benefits him in the form of a branded cut. As consumers though, our choices now becomes limited to branded cuts. If one looks at RBs, we do not necessarily have to purchase branded cuts at a premium to get a well cut stone. I don't see why this cannot also apply to fancies.
Ditto what Chrono said.
My own two cents: The thinly-veiled branded-cut boosterism on the part of certain posters gets old.
Part of the fun of buying fancy cuts is the variety in appearance from stone-to-stone. I think branded fancy cuts take the fun out of the search.
Lula|1416366317|3786178 said:Part of the fun of buying fancy cuts is the variety in appearance from stone-to-stone. I think branded fancy cuts take the fun out of the search.
Oh come on David ... you must start a "pancake stone" thread!..Rockdiamond|1416360223|3786093 said:Dancing Fire|1416359815|3786088 said:OK, please post pics of your fancy shape "pancake" diamond...Rockdiamond|1416359446|3786081 said:Dancing Fire said:David
please show us a sparky 2ct RB with a 3ct diameter size.
Speaking of Fancy Shapes DF![]()
So we can have another clusterXXXX while certain people tear apart my photographs...no thanks![]()
But if you Google the term "Cushion Diamond" and look at the images, my photos are pretty easy to find
This isn't about my diamonds - it's about how to best advise people and have everyone live in peace and harmony....
And then I woke up.
Diamond2014|1416379665|3786267 said:diamondseeker2006,
Maybe I can answer your question about the affiliated cookies since my past was computer related. When you Google something like "Electric Heater", Google will remember your IP address and affiliated words you have searched "Electric Heater". After that, every time you go to ANY website using any computer inside your house that use the same IP address, you'll see advertisement on the top or right side or left side of any website such as Walmart ads for electric heater. You go to Amazon.com and you'll see how Amazon.com bring up electric heaters in your front page. Then you log into your Facebook and somehow you see Facebook also inserted an online retailer with a similar model of electric heater into your news Facebook news feeds.
Facebook and Google was suppose to be viral but somewhere along the line, they secretly settled a treaty and decided to share information with each others. So things you search on Google will pretty much be shared with all other retailers out there and those retailers ALREADY know exactly what you're looking for. All ads you see on many websites are Google Ads where the owner of the website get paid when someone click on it.
THAT is what Garry hate about going online. Cant really escape it though.
Diamond2014|1416350504|3785985 said:Niel, What diamond did you bought or have and why did you make those choices? Why didnt you buy a Z color with I3 clarity since earth also made those? Whether human being declare the diamond's value or not, it still has value. And in reality, people want status, that's why they buy the best diamond that they can afford to out beat each others. If it's really for sentimental value, a 0.00001 carat with Z color and S3 Clarity would have been sufficient
diamondseeker2006|1416382023|3786277 said:Lula|1416366317|3786178 said:Chrono|1416336638|3785865 said:diamondseeker2006|1416334821|3785845 said:In terms of cut in regard to fancy shapes, I actually prefer the fact that Jonathan of GOG stopped spending time here debating and moved on to designing and producing well cut fancy shape diamonds (in addition to the well cut lines he already carried). That has a LOT more benefit to consumers, in my opinion.
It benefits him in the form of a branded cut. As consumers though, our choices now becomes limited to branded cuts. If one looks at RBs, we do not necessarily have to purchase branded cuts at a premium to get a well cut stone. I don't see why this cannot also apply to fancies.
Ditto what Chrono said.
My own two cents: The thinly-veiled branded-cut boosterism on the part of certain posters gets old.
Part of the fun of buying fancy cuts is the variety in appearance from stone-to-stone. I think branded fancy cuts take the fun out of the search.
Part of the fun for you? Maybe fun for another person is finding rare, outstanding cut stones that few in the world have. So please do not generalize your opinion to apply to everyone. I could care LESS about branding in terms of diamonds, but I DO care a lot about well cut diamonds. I happen to have admired DiaGem (Yoram) as a cutter long before GOG ever started working with him. And if one took the time to look at some of the newly cut antiques, they would find that they do differ in appearance from one another.
No one is limited to buying branded stones. All the generic stones are still out there in the thousands and no one ever has to pay a brand premium unless that is their stone choice. I am at least happy to have the choice between an ideal cut fancy and a lesser cut, whereas before, there were extremely few or no ideal cut fancies! See, this attitude is the problem, DS. A fancy that is not branded is not necessarily a "lesser cut." You admit yourself in your next paragraph. But the attitude that non-branded stones are "lesser" is what I object to. Branded cuts come at a significant premium. With newbies, if we are not careful with the terms we use, we come off sounding like branded cuts are superior to generic cuts, and that to get a good stone, you've got to fork out the additional cash for a branded stone, and that is not the case.
I also happen to adore the best cut old cuts such as RandG's Cartier OEC, ForteKitty's OEC (which I have seen in person), and I won't be able to name them all without leaving some great ones out, so I will stop with those two examples. Great cutters were around 100 years ago, too, and I would seek out stones of that caliber if I were personally looking. They are rare and a great treasure when found. I agree with you .
So I will always promote well cut stones here, but I do not try to force a newly cut antique style stone on someone who specifically comes looking for a true antique, and I also do not try to sway those looking at excellent, newly cut antique style stones toward antique stones that are not as well cut (which happens all the time). I still think the majority of new posters here are looking for modern round brilliants for engagement rings, and if that's what they want, I will help them find a well cut one since they are readily accessible.
I believe this forum was designed to educate people on cut quality, and I certainly appreciated that information when I first came here looking for a diamond almost 9 years ago. The options for well cut stones have definitely increased since I first came. That has to be a good thing. (Even David has had Yoram cut stones for him!!!)I agree 100% with this statement. And I have nothing but respect for Yoram and the other cutters who have the skill to produce a finished diamond that maximizes the potential of an individual piece of diamond rough. It's an amazing skill. And many cutters do it every day -- anonymously.
kenny|1416383236|3786283 said:Lula|1416366317|3786178 said:Part of the fun of buying fancy cuts is the variety in appearance from stone-to-stone. I think branded fancy cuts take the fun out of the search.
The Octavia is one of the many styles of Asschers.
I only want one, and the pattern and light performance is the ultimate, IMO.
I don't understand how that takes the fun out of the search.
You can also pick a Royal Asscher or perhaps there are other branded Asschers; then of course there are many styles of generic asschers.
To each their own.
I had a blast picking my rounds and fancy cuts, ACA, Solasfera and Octavias ... all branded cuts.
All are guaranteed to blow your head off with light performance and required zero shopping-effort cut-wise.
I accept that I paid some premium for the convenience and the bulls-eye cut quality.
If you feel it is more fun to shop for a generic stone, no problem.
Knock yourself out.
Does branding take the fun out?
For me, no.
For you, apparently.
So don't buy a branded fancy.
It's not all just one way for everyone.
People have different preferences and experiences.
kenny|1416383236|3786283 said:Lula|1416366317|3786178 said:Part of the fun of buying fancy cuts is the variety in appearance from stone-to-stone. I think branded fancy cuts take the fun out of the search.
The Octavia is one of the many styles of Asschers.
I only want one, and the pattern and light performance is the ultimate, IMO.
I don't understand how that takes the fun out of the search.
You can also pick a Royal Asscher or perhaps there are other branded Asschers; then of course there are many styles of generic asschers.
To each their own.
I had a blast picking my rounds and fancy cuts, ACA, Solasfera and Octavias ... all branded cuts.
All are guaranteed to blow your head off with light performance and required zero shopping-effort cut-wise.
I accept that I paid some premium for the convenience and the bulls-eye cut quality.
If you feel it is more fun to shop for a generic stone, no problem.
Knock yourself out.
Does branding take the fun out?
For me, no.
For you, apparently.
So don't buy a branded fancy.
It's not all just one way for everyone.
People have different preferences and experiences.
Lula|1416405469|3786394 said:diamondseeker2006|1416382023|3786277 said:Lula|1416366317|3786178 said:Chrono|1416336638|3785865 said:diamondseeker2006|1416334821|3785845 said:In terms of cut in regard to fancy shapes, I actually prefer the fact that Jonathan of GOG stopped spending time here debating and moved on to designing and producing well cut fancy shape diamonds (in addition to the well cut lines he already carried). That has a LOT more benefit to consumers, in my opinion.
It benefits him in the form of a branded cut. As consumers though, our choices now becomes limited to branded cuts. If one looks at RBs, we do not necessarily have to purchase branded cuts at a premium to get a well cut stone. I don't see why this cannot also apply to fancies.
Ditto what Chrono said.
My own two cents: The thinly-veiled branded-cut boosterism on the part of certain posters gets old.
Part of the fun of buying fancy cuts is the variety in appearance from stone-to-stone. I think branded fancy cuts take the fun out of the search.
Part of the fun for you? Maybe fun for another person is finding rare, outstanding cut stones that few in the world have. So please do not generalize your opinion to apply to everyone. I could care LESS about branding in terms of diamonds, but I DO care a lot about well cut diamonds. I happen to have admired DiaGem (Yoram) as a cutter long before GOG ever started working with him. And if one took the time to look at some of the newly cut antiques, they would find that they do differ in appearance from one another.
No one is limited to buying branded stones. All the generic stones are still out there in the thousands and no one ever has to pay a brand premium unless that is their stone choice. I am at least happy to have the choice between an ideal cut fancy and a lesser cut, whereas before, there were extremely few or no ideal cut fancies! See, this attitude is the problem, DS. A fancy that is not branded is not necessarily a "lesser cut." You admit yourself in your next paragraph. But the attitude that non-branded stones are "lesser" is what I object to. Branded cuts come at a significant premium. With newbies, if we are not careful with the terms we use, we come off sounding like branded cuts are superior to generic cuts, and that to get a good stone, you've got to fork out the additional cash for a branded stone, and that is not the case.
I also happen to adore the best cut old cuts such as RandG's Cartier OEC, ForteKitty's OEC (which I have seen in person), and I won't be able to name them all without leaving some great ones out, so I will stop with those two examples. Great cutters were around 100 years ago, too, and I would seek out stones of that caliber if I were personally looking. They are rare and a great treasure when found. I agree with you .
So I will always promote well cut stones here, but I do not try to force a newly cut antique style stone on someone who specifically comes looking for a true antique, and I also do not try to sway those looking at excellent, newly cut antique style stones toward antique stones that are not as well cut (which happens all the time). I still think the majority of new posters here are looking for modern round brilliants for engagement rings, and if that's what they want, I will help them find a well cut one since they are readily accessible.
I believe this forum was designed to educate people on cut quality, and I certainly appreciated that information when I first came here looking for a diamond almost 9 years ago. The options for well cut stones have definitely increased since I first came. That has to be a good thing. (Even David has had Yoram cut stones for him!!!)I agree 100% with this statement. And I have nothing but respect for Yoram and the other cutters who have the skill to produce a finished diamond that maximizes the potential of an individual piece of diamond rough. It's an amazing skill. And many cutters do it every day -- anonymously.
I say bravo, I love well cut "generic" asschers and before being forced into the trade loved helping people find one.diamondseeker2006|1416415475|3786492 said:I will give you one last example regarding new stones. I bought an excellent cut, generic asscher for a right hand ring. There were Octavia Asschers and Royal Asschers available at the time. Do I feel my asscher is inferior and needs to be replaced? No. It was well cut to begin with and I couldn't justify the cost difference for a specialty cut for a right hand ring. It's kind of like the difference between super ideal cut and ideal cut. If money were no object I might always buy super ideal, but for most coming here, budget is not unlimited and trade-offs have to be made. But we are still talking about choosing between two or more excellent cut stones, not excellent versus fair.
Karl_K said:The old days were not the ultimate either.
In one time period if someone came here asking for a cushion they would be told by 5 people yuck who wants one of them them you want an ACA RB they are the best.
I worked very hard to change that.
PS is more inclusive of different diamonds that it has ever been.
I do not recommend that diamond vendors post here anymore, because saying almost anything positive in regard to their own items is labelled shilling.
denverappraiser|1416417675|3786516 said:I have cut way back on my participation here although I’m not one of the professionals who have fully gone away. For me the issue has been time. I tend to write fairly long posts and I try to thoughtfully answer the question given. Some take over an hour to put together and typical is at least 10 minutes, and I type pretty fast. I spend more time reading than I do writing. I’ve got 7400 posts. At 10 minutes each plus another 10 minutes worth of reading, that’s something like 2400 hours that I’ve devoted to this body of work. I’m not complaining, it’s worked out pretty well for me, I’m just explaining the logic. That’s YEAR of full time work! The payoff, for me, has been in improving my overall reputation both with the public and within the trade, improving my education, and improving my ability to explain certain things to clients. I do get some clients who look me up here but, frankly, it’s not all that many. Like jewelers, appraisals are mostly a local affair. I’ve made some remarkably good friends including, for example, two of the groomsmen at my wedding (I got married in 2012). I find it entertaining and it definitely gives me something to talk about at the appraiser conventions. I don’t regret it a bit but I can certainly see how a neighborhood jeweler would be shy to dive into that.
Lula|1416406794|3786411 said:... My objection is to the inference on the part of several posters that it's not possible to find a generic cut that it cut as well as a branded cut, and that is simply not true. ...
kenny|1416424973|3786615 said:Lula|1416406794|3786411 said:... My objection is to the inference on the part of several posters that it's not possible to find a generic cut that it cut as well as a branded cut, and that is simply not true. ...
I agree with you.
Well cut generics ARE out there.
I wore a superbly-cut generic asscher from Good Old Gold for years and loved it.
I have never stated or intentionally inferred, "it's not possible to find a generic cut that it cut as well as a branded cut".
If someone 'infers' that from what I have written, then that's on them.
Inference can be as much in the reader's mind as the writer's.
Also I fully concede that just getting a branded diamond is not as much of an adventurous diamond safari as seeking out a well-cut generic.