Ellen
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2006
- Messages
- 24,433
This diamond came from my moms ering. It was larger than this in the beginning, and set in a platinum setting. Several years ago, she took it to her family jeweler (I use that term lightly) to have the prong tips replaced. Long story short, he cracked the diamond.
So, he sent this stone off to be recut enough to be presentable, and replaced it with a new one to go in moms setting. I was then given the choice of taking this loose stone, or getting the one with the setting, my sister would get the other. I picked the loose stone for sentimental reasons, since I was so close with my dad. I wanted the original stone he gave her.
Of course, this was way pre-pricescope, and I''d never seen an emeral cut diamond up close. At first it looked really pretty, and honestly did have a "deep" look to it. But after staring at it obsessively for a bit, the look changed. lol Now I was really seeing it, and it didn''t look as good. I also had no idea what a really well cut emerald diamond looked like, and had no idea if this one was or not.
To shorten the story, after getting on PS and looking at the papers, it really couldn''t get much worse. What really saddens me is, my dad cashed in all his bonds to buy my mother this ring, and probably paid a lot of money for a poor diamond.
I put it in this setting, but I don''t wear it anymore. However I would like to, more for sentimental reasons, since I lost my dad several years ago. So, I was thinking it may be better suited for a necklace. I would like to incorporate the tapered baguettes if possible. Do you think this would work?
Here are the specs, hold on to your seats.
D VS1
Diameter 7.55x3.86x2.39
.61 cts.
T 70%
D 61.9 %
Girdle Extremely thin to thick
Polish Good
Symmetry Fair
The pics aren''t too hot, but these are hard to photograph and I''m sick and didn''t feel like fighting for better ones. You get the picture though. It does look better than this in real life.


So, he sent this stone off to be recut enough to be presentable, and replaced it with a new one to go in moms setting. I was then given the choice of taking this loose stone, or getting the one with the setting, my sister would get the other. I picked the loose stone for sentimental reasons, since I was so close with my dad. I wanted the original stone he gave her.
Of course, this was way pre-pricescope, and I''d never seen an emeral cut diamond up close. At first it looked really pretty, and honestly did have a "deep" look to it. But after staring at it obsessively for a bit, the look changed. lol Now I was really seeing it, and it didn''t look as good. I also had no idea what a really well cut emerald diamond looked like, and had no idea if this one was or not.
To shorten the story, after getting on PS and looking at the papers, it really couldn''t get much worse. What really saddens me is, my dad cashed in all his bonds to buy my mother this ring, and probably paid a lot of money for a poor diamond.

I put it in this setting, but I don''t wear it anymore. However I would like to, more for sentimental reasons, since I lost my dad several years ago. So, I was thinking it may be better suited for a necklace. I would like to incorporate the tapered baguettes if possible. Do you think this would work?
Here are the specs, hold on to your seats.

D VS1
Diameter 7.55x3.86x2.39
.61 cts.
T 70%
D 61.9 %
Girdle Extremely thin to thick
Polish Good
Symmetry Fair
The pics aren''t too hot, but these are hard to photograph and I''m sick and didn''t feel like fighting for better ones. You get the picture though. It does look better than this in real life.
