TravelingGal
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2004
- Messages
- 17,193
I think we''re way past talking about lobster guy, specifically. Just talking about the abuse of the system in general. And yeah, while we don''t know the specific''s of lobster guy''s situation, I think it''s fine to speculate and draw hypothetical conclusions...it''s interesting discussion anyway.Date: 8/18/2008 2:32:38 PM
Author: fieryred33143
Date: 8/18/2008 2:26:10 PM
Author: meresal
Fiery, I don''t mean to be a Bia, and I sure hope I don''t come off that way... but not everyone that posted in this thread said things like that and that may have been stereotypical. Many of us agreed with what MC said about not knowing the situation. We just didn''t post multiple paragraphs, that were as noticable.Date: 8/18/2008 2:08:06 PM
Author: fieryred33143
That''s exactly right. Stereotypes. And its because of those stereotypes that everyone assumed this person asking if they could purchase a lobster with their assistance is abusing the system. This entire debate was because of the stereotype that DF lumped everyone into.Date: 8/18/2008 2:00:54 PM
Author: CrookedRock
Fiery, I don''t think anyone (and I know I didn''t), put down the people who genuinely need help such as Alicia''s Mother. Those people absolutely need help and should get help. It''s what the American spirit used to be all about... Helping one another.
I just wanted to point out that no one has put down those who are truly in need. It''s the abuse that bothers people, and one reason is bc it creates stereotypes.
I think MC said it best a few pages ago. We are all debating over something when we have no idea what really happened and none of us were even there.
![]()
Perhaps my use of ''everyone'' wasn''t accurate. I didn''t mean everyone. I always use the word ''everyone'' I need to check that![]()
crown-I respect your thoughts as well and your ideas on how to contribute back were spot on. You''re right, not all will see eye to eye or even have to. But there are people, DF in particular, who refuse to see/respect other opinions and instead resort to '''' only when someone agrees with them. Beebrisk and I didn''t see eye to eye but I agreed with everything she (??) said as a response to my post because it was a thorough, legitimate, and honest argument.![]()
Honestly, I doubt this whole ''lobster'' thing even happen![]()
And about the whole "America, love it or leave it" type of sentiment, please. I love this country and will always be grateful to my father for bringing me here and for the opportunities America has for immigrants. Perhaps immigrants can be more critical of America because so many of us come in through the bottom and see things that many natives do not (if that makes sense). I would say the the vast majority of immigrants love their adopted country more than their native one (because, duh, there''s a reason why we left) but a lot of us don''t have that crazy nationalistic pride that so many natives do...but that doesn''t mean we aren''t proud to be an American. When we named our daughter using a combination of our home countries, I picked America, not Korea, because America is my home. Um, that and "Amelia" sounded a lot better than "Korelia."

We should have been on welfare when we first entered the country, but as an immigrant my father firmly felt that he should be a productive and contributing member of society and not mooch off his new country. It probably would have made our lives easier if he did take welfare! Like another poster said, I am all for welfare to assist, but I draw the line when it becomes a lifestyle where people work to stay ON welfare.