- Joined
- Mar 22, 2017
- Messages
- 1,121
At this point, it certainly seems that the additional FBI investigation Dems are foaming at the mouth over would be pretty darn worthless if none of their previous 6 investigations into Kav’s background failed to turn up a single shred of this mass ‘rape culture’ he allegedly surrounded himself with.
What’s even more sick and twisted about this Swetnick statement - and those who rush to her defense - is that she appears to have attended these parties - where young girls were being raped - AS AN ADULT. She graduated in 1980, and claims to have attended these parties in 1981-82, so unless she graduated a few years early (possible), she admits to knowingly attending gang-rape parties as an adult while minor girls were being abused. Her admission disgusts me.
What’s not to ‘believe’ about her allegations ... every woman has the right to choose to have a fun night out after all.
Those who ignore this woman’s admission disgust me.
Once again, you're deflecting from what is pertinent here. Being a crappy person isn't a crime. Being a crappy person doesn't mean that her testimony isn't credible. It doesn't matter what her character is - what matters is, did she witness Kavanaugh participate in sexual assaults or not and, if she did, can she back those accusations up? Your political bias has you foaming at the mouth, trying to attack her credibility over and over. How about we let an impartial group trained to investigate do so, and let the facts either exonerate or impugn him?