janinegirly
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2006
- Messages
- 3,689
Date: 8/4/2009 9:28:00 AM
Author: purselover
I voted #1 if you''re uncomfortable paying a lot of money to attend a wedding you shouldn''t go, not take it out of their gift.
A friend of ours (who''s Spanish but lives in Austria) was getting married in her hometown of Gijon, Spain.
Not only were we invited, but she made it a point to let us know we were sitting at their table for the reception and the festivities were going on for the whole week. Her birthday happened to be three days after the wedding.
Between the airline tickets, the hotel, the low exchange rate for the dollar to the euro, and having to get her a gift for her b-day, i wanted to give something small for the wedding.
My husband disagreed. He thought as we were invited, and decided to go, it would be rude not to give the same thing we''d give for a wedding here. I totally disagreed but in the end, he won.
We winded up giving 300 euros, plus as she''s a scarf fanatic, I got her a designer one for her birthday. To be honest, I appreciated how they spent the week with all their guests. Taking us all around, showing us the sites, having dinner with us. In a sense, they gave up their honeymoon to entertain those of us who were traveling for the wedding.
Ditto.Date: 8/4/2009 9:28:00 AM
Author: purselover
I voted #1 if you''re uncomfortable paying a lot of money to attend a wedding you shouldn''t go, not take it out of their gift.
Date: 8/4/2009 8:26:53 AM
Author: Hudson_Hawk
I''m not voting because I don''t see anything that fits my view. A gift is a gift and shouldn''t be based on what the people paid per plate. It''s the B/G''s decision to have an expensive wedding, and they shouldn''t do so expecting to receive reimbursement from their guests. I would go and bring a gift that I could afford. If I''m expending a lot to be there (traveling, etc), then I''ll probably give a smaller gift.
Interesting. I was always "taught" that it should be cash/check and cover the cost of the plate per person at least. Family and close friends give more.Date: 8/4/2009 9:53:00 AM
Author: cocolaw
Date: 8/4/2009 8:26:53 AM
Author: Hudson_Hawk
I'm not voting because I don't see anything that fits my view. A gift is a gift and shouldn't be based on what the people paid per plate. It's the B/G's decision to have an expensive wedding, and they shouldn't do so expecting to receive reimbursement from their guests. I would go and bring a gift that I could afford. If I'm expending a lot to be there (traveling, etc), then I'll probably give a smaller gift.
ditto! i have had a similar talk with friends in new jersey. i am southern and it amazes me how regional so much of this is. my friend in nj says it is common for people to write checks at the table, based on how nice the reception is. i always thought you really should try not to bring gifts to the wedding, but that you sent them to the bride's house before the wedding. and that the gift was either off the registry or something that you pick out, based on your relationship with and feelings for the couple! it never had any correlation with the size or cost of the wedding.
Ditto! I voted for #2 above and I agree with FMMcKerrall.Date: 8/4/2009 10:03:08 AM
Author: FutureMrs.McKerrall
My FI and I are having a DW and a reception when we get back. We have asked (verbally and on our website) that we don''t receive any gifts. For all of those who are coming to the Dominican, they are already paying enough, and for reception when we get back, most people will have to travel again and pay for a hotel room, gas, etc... FI and I have been together for awhile and have bought a house together, so we really don''t ''need'' anything.
I think a wedding gift is a gesture and there isn''t a mandatory amount or size of gift that is acceptable. I think that you should give what you are comfortable giving - big or small, regardless if you have to travel or not.
Sorry to intrude...Date: 8/4/2009 9:59:13 AM
Author: elle_chris
Interesting. I was always 'taught' that it should be cash/check and cover the cost of the plate per person at least. Family and close friends give more.
I'm from NYC.
Date: 8/4/2009 11:39:17 AM
Author: Italiahaircolor
I think you should always do what you can. If that means, because you are traveling, you can only afford a small token...so be it.
"I also think it''s funny when people say they should "cover their plate", what I want to know is how on earth you have any idea what the cost of your plate was? Unless you had your wedding at that venue, my guess is that you have no idea!"
Ditto.Date: 8/4/2009 12:25:33 PM
Author: swingirl
Your guests shouldn''t be expected to pay for your wedding. You want a lavish wedding? You pay for it. It''s not the guest''s choice. They are giving you a gift to to commemorate your marriage not a party.
Haha, that''s an awesome concept!!! I totally agreeDate: 8/4/2009 1:03:15 PM
Author: trillionaire
I am in the camp of ''gifts are gifts, and not to be EXPECTED.''
I plan to elope, then have a reception. I''m not inclined to register, nor will we be expecting gifts. We want love, support, and for our guests to have FUN and a memorable time, and a gift is the last thing that I expect. No matter where we have our reception, the logistics are going to be less than desirable, and 70-90% of people will have to travel (probably including the bride and groom!).If they come at all, THAT is our gift. The memories, the pictures, those are the gifts. I would resent being invited to weddings where I was ''expected'' to pay for my plate. If that is the case, just send me a bill with the invitation, so that I can decide whether or not I want to come.![]()
![]()