Table Percentage to Depth Percentage Ratio?

[Dinky89484]

Similar to how Crown Angles play with the Pavilion Angles, and the inverse relationship the two have with each other (e.g. with a more shallow Crown you'd want a steeper Pavilion angle, and vice versa)....is there such an inverse type relationship with the Table % and Depth %?

Ideal Table %: 54-57, Ideal Dept %: 61-62.3...at the lower end Table 54, would you want to be on the upper end Depth 62.3 (or 62.5)?

 

[lovedogs]

Not that I am aware of!

The common idea is that depth between 61-62 is nice bc it gives fire (e.g. it's not 60/60) but also doesn't sacrifice on size or get close to overly deep.

Also smaller tables can mean more fire.

So I think a lot of us like tables of 54-56 and depth 61.xx
But no, there's no relationship that I've heard of in terms of table/depth combos

 

[Karl_K]

depth defines how deep a box has to be to hold it not how it will fill it.
table to depth ratio is useless for determining performance.