- Joined
- Apr 3, 2004
- Messages
- 33,852
lbbaber|1303315786|2900944 said:Dancing Fire|1303270722|2900711 said:[quote="300GCP You definitely don't sound harsh at all. The original ring when purchased cost $12k. Current fiancee got $7,800 for it. New ering cost $8,500 plus tax.
You are right, I do feel like previous fiancee bought the current e-ring, and that is definitely a huge contributing factor. The quality is also huge for me because of the fact that I can see the inclusion (I think). And yes, we are both lawyers, he is actually a partner at a big firm, so adding a bit more wouldn't have been a problem.
He told me about the experience with the jeweler, and basically the jeweler was saying he bought this stone in a prior year and hasn't sold it, and therefore can really give him a great deal on it. He also showed my fiancee to other stones - 1.65, F, VS2 and 1.81, F, VS2, which were both tens of thousands of dollars more. There was no in between.
I really am upset if I let myself admit it.![]()
... so basically he fork out < $1000 bucks for your E-ring?
..IMO,he should at least match the $7800 that he gotten out of your original ring.
don't you know the rule that the second E-ring must be bigger and better quality than the first?..; ))
Ha ha ha ha ha ha , love it!! TOOOO funny. When I started looking at rings with my current husband, I said the only rule is that it must be bigger and better than my ring from my 1st marriage




OF COURSE the man is better than the 1st husband, if he wasn't we wouldnt have been looking at rings together.
And I DID get a better/bigger stone (1ct = 1st marriage, 1.61ct = 2nd marriage---I dont plan on a 3rd!!)[/quote]
same rule,better and bigger than the first 2 marriage...