shape
carat
color
clarity

Sold!

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
I want add my congratulations as well. There is something truly special about that stone and I was afraid you were second guessing your choice too much. Sure, like none of us have ever done that, huh??? Anyway, now that you have ''the'' stone all settled, it will be fun to see what setting you choose.

Best of everything to you!!!
 
Date: 9/7/2006 11:24:12 PM
Author: Cehrabehra


Date: 9/7/2006 8:15:36 PM
Author: widget

Now don't get TOO creative and innovative on the mounting!!! LOL...or I'll come and get you! (JK
2.gif
)

I don't know what you mean about coming to get me if I get too creative LOL Is it an inside joke I'm missing?
Ignore me, Cehra! I was just yakking about my own biases. I think I love your stone so much, I was imagining it's mine!
20.gif


I guess I'm partial to traditional classic mountings, especially for classic stones like
this one. The picture you posted and ideas you mentioned sound lovely. It's just that I tend to think if a concept is too 'innovative', and hasn't been seen in hundreds of years of ring design...then there must be a reason.
1.gif


LOL...IGNORE ME! What do I know? I'm just SO thrilled you're keeping that beauty! I KNOW you'll have fun figuring finally how you're going to mount it.

widget
 
Hi CB,

Well I am glad that your search is finally over, now to the more difficult part, the setting! However, perhaps I can be of assistance in that area, since you and I both have a similar desire for a protected setting that wont eat up our precious stones
12.gif


Here is something that I found after I finalized my design with Mark T, but I thought immediately of you. The part I think that fits isn''t necessarily the ornate aspect but rather how the stone is set in "flush" prongs, I suppose one might call it a quasi-bezel... hope this helps!

the setting is from Fay Cullen

girdleoec.jpg
 
Date: 9/8/2006 12:26:25 PM
Author: widget

Date: 9/7/2006 11:24:12 PM
Author: Cehrabehra



Date: 9/7/2006 8:15:36 PM
Author: widget

Now don''t get TOO creative and innovative on the mounting!!! LOL...or I''ll come and get you! (JK
2.gif
)

I don''t know what you mean about coming to get me if I get too creative LOL Is it an inside joke I''m missing?
Ignore me, Cehra! I was just yakking about my own biases. I think I love your stone so much, I was imagining it''s mine!
20.gif


I guess I''m partial to traditional classic mountings, especially for classic stones like
this one. The picture you posted and ideas you mentioned sound lovely. It''s just that I tend to think if a concept is too ''innovative'', and hasn''t been seen in hundreds of years of ring design...then there must be a reason.
1.gif


LOL...IGNORE ME! What do I know? I''m just SO thrilled you''re keeping that beauty! I KNOW you''ll have fun figuring finally how you''re going to mount it.

widget
I really didn''t think people liked it, I thought you guys were being polite lol It has such a strange look to it like a face only a mother could love lol! It does fantastic things in bending light though which was exactly what I wanted! I had almost as many rainbows by the moon as I do in the day!
 
Date: 9/8/2006 12:44:48 PM
Author: Scott 00
Hi CB,

Well I am glad that your search is finally over, now to the more difficult part, the setting! However, perhaps I can be of assistance in that area, since you and I both have a similar desire for a protected setting that wont eat up our precious stones
12.gif


Here is something that I found after I finalized my design with Mark T, but I thought immediately of you. The part I think that fits isn''t necessarily the ornate aspect but rather how the stone is set in ''flush'' prongs, I suppose one might call it a quasi-bezel... hope this helps!

the setting is from Fay Cullen
I think that''s a bit too masculine for me LOL I am going to do 8 prongs though... but they''re going to be small and hold it to a little bezely shelf or something... and I''m hoping they can make it so that the prongs are extensions of the scrolls... the girdle on mine is med/sl thick so I really shouldn''t worry too much about it... I want it to look like a stone suspended over a mirror and a diamond studded lace veil has fallen over it. There are a TON of fay cullen rings like this except they aren''t over the mirror... here''s one... I just don''t want it to extend past the stone N/S so like this but more in a split shank size, but a split shank that stretches out a centimeter to the ends of the stone ( just not past it) and scroll tips/prongs that reach around the ends of the diamond, overlapping.

asdfw2.jpg
 
I''m glad you decided to keep the stone! It certainly has personality and I suspect you''d be highly pressed to find another like it!
36.gif
 
Date: 9/8/2006 12:26:25 PM
Author: widget
Ignore me, Cehra! I was just yakking about my own biases. I think I love your stone so much, I was imagining it's mine!
20.gif


I guess I'm partial to traditional classic mountings, especially for classic stones like
this one. The picture you posted and ideas you mentioned sound lovely. It's just that I tend to think if a concept is too 'innovative', and hasn't been seen in hundreds of years of ring design...then there must be a reason.
1.gif


LOL...IGNORE ME! What do I know? I'm just SO thrilled you're keeping that beauty! I KNOW you'll have fun figuring finally how you're going to mount it.

widget
LOL I keep thinking about this post!! I've seen rings that were *way* too modern for me, very aysmetrical and totally different... I actually like the old fashioned looks with engraving and milgrain and filligree... but I have certain things I really want... I want the part that touches my hand to just be smooth and solid metal I have a channel set band that bugs the hell out of me under the stones where the cut outs are. I want to reflect under the stone... I want the stone girdle set... I dont' mind if the crown sticks out but I definitely want it fairly flush so as not to catch on anything... same reason I want a split shank, so it's a smooth line to the ends of the stone and there isn't a head to catch on things... I love the look I'm just trying to be practical LOL! I love that look where head heavy diamonds topple to the side hehehe but I need something that wont catch. how the ring ends up could be totally different...

here's the only designer ring I've really thought about, with modification... it's a LM design... I would move the thing that goes around the stone up to the girdle, remove all the pave and put in engraving and milgrain, and add in filigree to fill in the split shank area... oh and the area under the stone, I'd fill that in so it was solid against my finger... the little square part that's like a window to your skin. rather have a mirror there than a window lol

is that really sound too weird? I guess maybe it does lol

cblmidea.jpg
 
Hi girls, okay... how long is too long? I really like this as halos go... and I really do want the stone set n/s now... but if I were to do something like this the dimensions around the halo part would be like 13x 11. That seems really big... is it too big? is a halo just ridiculous? I like those old fashioned halos that are not tailored and aren''t all pave. I think I''d rather have fewer but larger melee stones... scattered around and not just lined up... does anyone know what I''m talking about? Would it just be too big?

longrectang.jpg
 
Cehra, to be honest, I love the Leon Mege ring for your diamond!!!
30.gif
I also would not really want all that pave, but I think it needs it on the top surfaces. I''d engrave the sides and bottom and put milgrain everywhere. I think that circle at the bottom needs to stay open to keep the design right. I really don''t think that last setting can compare with the Leon.
 
Date: 9/8/2006 11:04:55 PM
Author: diamondseeker2006
Cehra, to be honest, I love the Leon Mege ring for your diamond!!!
30.gif
I also would not really want all that pave, but I think it needs it on the top surfaces. I''d engrave the sides and bottom and put milgrain everywhere. I think that circle at the bottom needs to stay open to keep the design right. I really don''t think that last setting can compare with the Leon.
Yeah I don''t think it compares either - I like that last one BETTER than leon hehehe I know he''s really popular and his stuff is really beautiful, but it doesn''t suit my tastes... I really like edwardian and victorian stuff with the swirls and foofoo LOL

I''ll probably design a ring that makes everyone gag, but hey, the diamond is weird so shall be the ring! But just as the diamond is a unique and interesting blend of old meets new... I think I''ll be able to pull off a ring that does the same and looks beautiful :) I think from here out I''ll just have to keep you guys in suspense... hehehe it''s only gonna be a few months ;D I have at least three design elements that will be a surprise even if I change nothing else lol And I could change everything... there''s so much I like! We''ll see :)
 
Lol! Well, as they tell me, the ring has to please YOU, not us!!! I think I could like the last setting better with something besides an emerald cut in the center. Those don''t go together and that''s part of the problem. It would look better with your stone or an oval, I think.
 
Date: 9/9/2006 1:17:58 AM
Author: diamondseeker2006
Lol! Well, as they tell me, the ring has to please YOU, not us!!! I think I could like the last setting better with something besides an emerald cut in the center. Those don''t go together and that''s part of the problem. It would look better with your stone or an oval, I think.
I have a ton of ideas, some of which would just sound too weird to post but will be lovely custom touches... I think it''ll turn out great :) I''ve never been very mainstream... my stone is certainly not, my approach certainly wasn''t LOL what I have in my head isn''t all that different from things I''ve seen, but it sounds so piecemeal when I try to explain it. Good thing the jeweler is close enough to drive to! lol
 
Okay... this is an ink drawing on my finger of the size of my stone and the shape I want the ring to look from the top... as you can see I have two triangles I need to fill in on either side... and I''m looking for some ideas. should it be solid metal? with engraving? embedded melee? filigree? left open ala split shank? I''m thinking I want to set it with 8 tiny prongs but not have them evenly spaced - like two at each corner. I worry about putting it just on a 2mm or 3mm band because I don''t want it to look like an engagement ring since I will not be wearing any other rings wtih it... whatever I do I need something to beef it up in a way that says, "one ring to rule them all" LOL!!

inkpenring.jpg
 
I just had another idea... do you think they could stick a head in one of those holes or something?

getheadin.jpg
 
Hee Hee - the photo of the ink drawing on your finger.... "Private eyes (clap clap), they''re watching you, they see your every move.." Sorry -- it just brought that song to my head!

I am glad you are happy with your beautiful stone my fire-fan buddy! :)
 
Date: 9/10/2006 3:35:34 PM
Author: :)
Hee Hee - the photo of the ink drawing on your finger.... ''Private eyes (clap clap), they''re watching you, they see your every move..'' Sorry -- it just brought that song to my head!

I am glad you are happy with your beautiful stone my fire-fan buddy! :)
bahaha you''re so funnay!!! I think I''ll just go color the table on my diamond in black now, thanks ;D hehehe
 
what about some twisty pave like this vintage Tiffany?

hfrontview.jpg
 
Date: 9/8/2006 12:26:25 PM
Author: widget
Date: 9/7/2006 11:24:12 PM

Author: Cehrabehra



Date: 9/7/2006 8:15:36 PM

Author: widget


Now don''t get TOO creative and innovative on the mounting!!! LOL...or I''ll come and get you! (JK
2.gif
)


I don''t know what you mean about coming to get me if I get too creative LOL Is it an inside joke I''m missing?
Ignore me, Cehra! I was just yakking about my own biases. I think I love your stone so much, I was imagining it''s mine!
20.gif



I guess I''m partial to traditional classic mountings, especially for classic stones like

this one. The picture you posted and ideas you mentioned sound lovely. It''s just that I tend to think if a concept is too ''innovative'', and hasn''t been seen in hundreds of years of ring design...then there must be a reason.
1.gif



LOL...IGNORE ME! What do I know? I''m just SO thrilled you''re keeping that beauty! I KNOW you''ll have fun figuring finally how you''re going to mount it.


widget

also want to agree with widget here. you do have a beautiful stone that has the look of an old cut stone and I agree that something really showcases it''s beauty would be fab, nothing too complicated or ornate. Of course, it''s your ring and I''m sure whatever you decide will be great for you. I also wonder why the hole is there at the bottom of the leon setting. I always thought it had something to do with the ability to clean the stone. But it does appear to be in the design elements of that particular Leon ring. If you find out, please let us know.
34.gif
 
Date: 9/10/2006 1:48:30 PM
Author: Cehrabehra
I just had another idea... do you think they could stick a head in one of those holes or something?

Here''s a Carl Blackburn design from Pearlman''s website that similar to what you''re suggesting. I LOVE LOVE LOVE this idea!

Carl Blackburn.jpg
 
I also still love a split shank like this Richard Landi...you can turn the stone either way, of course.

rlandi2.jpg
 
Date: 9/10/2006 5:32:41 PM
Author: diamondseeker2006
I also still love a split shank like this Richard Landi...you can turn the stone either way, of course.
I agree, I could easily see it in a split shank.
30.gif
 
SO GLAD you are keeping that stone ... what about THIS setting ...from a designer in Santa Fe who used to work for Van Cleef I think.

More info in this old thread

crazygoodring2.gif
 
Ooh, LOVE that last setting that Deco posted.

I''m also so glad you are keeping that stone. When you talked about not liking it and sending it back, I had visions of buying it myself!! (couldn''t afford it, but I love it!)
 
Date: 9/10/2006 5:27:06 PM
Author: Dee*Jay

Date: 9/10/2006 1:48:30 PM
Author: Cehrabehra
I just had another idea... do you think they could stick a head in one of those holes or something?

Here''s a Carl Blackburn design from Pearlman''s website that similar to what you''re suggesting. I LOVE LOVE LOVE this idea!
Oy, I typed out this big long response and not only did the computer eat it, it locked up explorer so I just restarted and went to watch a movie LOL! I don''t remember what I said other than I love it! Oh yeah, something about being concerned that it would bug my finger the way my channel set ann band does - if my finger swells even a little it just chaffes it!! But I did see this one (I think I might like yours better though :D) and have been toying with it in my head... :D At leaset that''s exactly what I want between or instead of split shanks... gorgeous!!

rg16362.jpg
 
Date: 9/10/2006 4:53:13 PM
Author: mrssalvo


also want to agree with widget here. you do have a beautiful stone that has the look of an old cut stone and I agree that something really showcases it''s beauty would be fab, nothing too complicated or ornate. Of course, it''s your ring and I''m sure whatever you decide will be great for you. I also wonder why the hole is there at the bottom of the leon setting. I always thought it had something to do with the ability to clean the stone. But it does appear to be in the design elements of that particular Leon ring. If you find out, please let us know.
34.gif
it probably is for cleaning, but I plan to leave the sides mostly open for that... and I agree that with the old cut stone I can''t do anything too modern, well I could but that wouldn''t suit me either... if this were an e-ring I''d probably just put it on a band with a baskety head and call it done (and get a band like the one I just posted without the center stone) hehehe but I really really don''t want to look like I''m engaged.
 
Date: 9/10/2006 7:19:33 PM
Author: decodelighted
SO GLAD you are keeping that stone ... what about THIS setting ...from a designer in Santa Fe who used to work for Van Cleef I think.

More info in this old thread
wow I really like that! I think if I were getting a square stone I''d look no further! I can''t picture a long stone set n/s though... I could an e/w set though... my husband talked me into the N/s and after a bit I agreed with him... I think setting it n/s scratched the itch I had for an oval all these years even though as ovals go this would be a very stumpy oval! lol
 
Date: 9/10/2006 9:42:37 PM
Author: lizz
Ooh, LOVE that last setting that Deco posted.

I''m also so glad you are keeping that stone. When you talked about not liking it and sending it back, I had visions of buying it myself!! (couldn''t afford it, but I love it!)
I know, I''m an idiot... I really didn''t know what to compare it to and it''s the only large stone I''ve ever really spent time with outside of a store and some times it seemed fantastic and others just looked *weird*. I was looking at fata''s stone and it is like exactly like her cut except someone put it on a stretcher another couple mm just in the middle LOL The part that bugs me is my favorite part too, looking at the rounds I realized hey my stone does what those do *almost* just as well but mine does all these other weird things too. I thought I was giving up too much in performance and then I realized I''m not, it''s just different. Like I said, I''m an idiot!!! Hey, it''s over my budget too. My whole ring was supposed to be less than I paid for this stone LOL! whoooooops!!
31.gif
 
Date: 9/11/2006 2:06:00 AM
Author: Cehrabehra
Date: 9/10/2006 5:27:06 PM

Author: Dee*Jay


Date: 9/10/2006 1:48:30 PM

Author: Cehrabehra

I just had another idea... do you think they could stick a head in one of those holes or something?


Here''s a Carl Blackburn design from Pearlman''s website that similar to what you''re suggesting. I LOVE LOVE LOVE this idea!
Oy, I typed out this big long response and not only did the computer eat it, it locked up explorer so I just restarted and went to watch a movie LOL! I don''t remember what I said other than I love it! Oh yeah, something about being concerned that it would bug my finger the way my channel set ann band does - if my finger swells even a little it just chaffes it!! But I did see this one (I think I might like yours better though :D) and have been toying with it in my head... :D At leaset that''s exactly what I want between or instead of split shanks... gorgeous!!


I like this A LOT! Can I ask where you found it?
 
Cehra,

I''m CONFUSED! I thought this was an ering upgrade. Why not put it in a basket setting leaving the focus on the stone and getting that pretty band to go with it? With that combo people won''t think you''re engaged, they''ll think you''re married.

Of course I really like the split shank design also.
 
Date: 9/11/2006 9:41:42 AM
Author: Dee*Jay

Date: 9/11/2006 2:06:00 AM
Author: Cehrabehra

Date: 9/10/2006 5:27:06 PM

Author: Dee*Jay



Date: 9/10/2006 1:48:30 PM

Author: Cehrabehra

I just had another idea... do you think they could stick a head in one of those holes or something?


Here''s a Carl Blackburn design from Pearlman''s website that similar to what you''re suggesting. I LOVE LOVE LOVE this idea!
Oy, I typed out this big long response and not only did the computer eat it, it locked up explorer so I just restarted and went to watch a movie LOL! I don''t remember what I said other than I love it! Oh yeah, something about being concerned that it would bug my finger the way my channel set ann band does - if my finger swells even a little it just chaffes it!! But I did see this one (I think I might like yours better though :D) and have been toying with it in my head... :D At leaset that''s exactly what I want between or instead of split shanks... gorgeous!!


I like this A LOT! Can I ask where you found it?
omg I don''t remember!! I think it''s a beverly K I''ll see if I can figure it out!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top