luvsdmb
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2012
- Messages
- 815
Niel|1374111876|3485166 said:well my first thing would be, why? whats got you needing something new.... seems like youve got an itch nothing will scratch
thing2of2|1374114626|3485201 said:Niel|1374111876|3485166 said:well my first thing would be, why? whats got you needing something new.... seems like youve got an itch nothing will scratch
Hahaha is this a joke? Are you forgetting your own upgrade saga? And defensiveness when anyone said the above to you?
luvsdmb|1374115333|3485205 said:What price should I start with?
Niel|1374115493|3485208 said:luvsdmb|1374115333|3485205 said:What price should I start with?
Hmm I don't know, what grading lab is the certificate from?
Polished|1374121395|3485259 said:luvsdmb, I sensed that your quest for the ring of your dreams had ceased to be a joy and had instead become something of a burden. I would just urge caution before deciding to sell. A poster here Maisie, who I hope won't mind if I mention her case as it's well documented. The long and short of it was that she became a bit preoccupied with the up-grading of the size of her diamonds to the point where she no longer enjoyed them but when she sold them she regretted that too. Something to be borne in mind is that selling your diamond might not provide the resolution you hope for. Would mothballing it in a safety deposit box in the bank put it sufficiently out of mind for you to postpone the ring dilemmas until you are in a shifted head space and possibly different life circumstances?
bastetcat|1374121471|3485262 said:Do you know the reason why you don't wear it as much as you thought you would? Not the same kind of finger coverage as the oval? Not sparkly enough? If you don't like it but know you want something else later down the line, you might take a few days to decide what you do and don't like about it or identify if you can why you don't like it so you have a better idea next time and don't go shooting down the wrong path again.
If you liked the finger coverage of the pear then once you find a setting (like a halo) then you ought to get your finger coverage back. If it isn't as sparkly as you'd like, you might see if it can be recut to more ideal proportions because it is deep. You will lose some carat weight but probably not much diameter.
Here are some similarly proportioned stones on JA:
http://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/1.50-carat-f-color-si2-clarity-very-good-cut-sku-231810
http://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/1.46-carat-g-color-si2-clarity-very-good-cut-sku-173153
Also, if choosing settings are a problem for you, I would urge you to try on settings before decding on them and taking pictures of them to look at later. I don't know if this is something you have done in the past but I can say there are times when I have looked at settings that I *like* that actually ended up looking bad on me when I look at them in pictures later so trying them on before deciding on one and not just picking one out would be essential if you are prone to changing your mind. Please correct me if I am wrong, but in previous threads on settings you seem to have picked them because you liked the look, customized them and then decided they looked bad on you so try them first and photograph them so you can look later and ditch the ideas that don't look good and be left with only the ideas that do.
FWIW, I feel your pain. I love halos, and I have one that looks nice on me with the plain shank (which I have discovered looks best on me). But wouldn't you know the thing that look truly best on me is a solitaire (which I hate and even hate to admit) and boy does that get my goat (plus, I'd need a honker to make it work).![]()
luvsdmb|1374152971|3485396 said:bastetcat|1374121471|3485262 said:Do you know the reason why you don't wear it as much as you thought you would? Not the same kind of finger coverage as the oval? Not sparkly enough? If you don't like it but know you want something else later down the line, you might take a few days to decide what you do and don't like about it or identify if you can why you don't like it so you have a better idea next time and don't go shooting down the wrong path again.
If you liked the finger coverage of the pear then once you find a setting (like a halo) then you ought to get your finger coverage back. If it isn't as sparkly as you'd like, you might see if it can be recut to more ideal proportions because it is deep. You will lose some carat weight but probably not much diameter.
Here are some similarly proportioned stones on JA:
http://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/1.50-carat-f-color-si2-clarity-very-good-cut-sku-231810
http://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/1.46-carat-g-color-si2-clarity-very-good-cut-sku-173153
Also, if choosing settings are a problem for you, I would urge you to try on settings before decding on them and taking pictures of them to look at later. I don't know if this is something you have done in the past but I can say there are times when I have looked at settings that I *like* that actually ended up looking bad on me when I look at them in pictures later so trying them on before deciding on one and not just picking one out would be essential if you are prone to changing your mind. Please correct me if I am wrong, but in previous threads on settings you seem to have picked them because you liked the look, customized them and then decided they looked bad on you so try them first and photograph them so you can look later and ditch the ideas that don't look good and be left with only the ideas that do.
FWIW, I feel your pain. I love halos, and I have one that looks nice on me with the plain shank (which I have discovered looks best on me). But wouldn't you know the thing that look truly best on me is a solitaire (which I hate and even hate to admit) and boy does that get my goat (plus, I'd need a honker to make it work).![]()
That is a great question of why I don't wear it.It has nothing to do with the size, finger coverage, anything like that. It scratches the hell out of my 1 year old. It's just plain and while I like the diamond and I am okay with the finger coverage with it not being in a setting I just don't love love love it the way it is right now to wear it all the time. I've never been the type to wear jewelry at home, but I always figured when I got married I would. Matter of fact when I got married the band I was married with never came off. I liked having a ring I did not have to think about. (that band does not fit right now, and no it can no be re-sized)
In the very beginning no I did not take pictures, but I do now. I keep thinking a plain shank with a halo is really what I am suppose to have, but I must admit I should have kept my oval.The type of halo I like, I never intended on with a round. I traded my oval for a round for a specific ring, and since I have not seen that ring since I've had my round I guess I should maybe try seeing it again.
I should have kept my original diamond that my now husband proposed to me with. Or I should have kept my oval. I like that it was different, I did not however love the color, but it was something that didn't look horrible. The color of my current RB is great. But I just don't love my ring right now.
concepta|1374154706|3485418 said:luvsdmb said:I am seriously thinking of selling my diamond, I would love any advice you could offer.
F
SI2
VG/VG
6.97-7.04x4.60mm
Depth 65.70%
Table 55.90%
Girdle thick
65.7% depth I hope that is a typo.
concepta|1374154706|3485418 said:luvsdmb said:I am seriously thinking of selling my diamond, I would love any advice you could offer.
F
SI2
VG/VG
6.97-7.04x4.60mm
Depth 65.70%
Table 55.90%
Girdle thick
65.7% depth I hope that is a typo.
arkieb1|1374155480|3485431 said:concepta|1374154706|3485418 said:luvsdmb said:I am seriously thinking of selling my diamond, I would love any advice you could offer.
F
SI2
VG/VG
6.97-7.04x4.60mm
Depth 65.70%
Table 55.90%
Girdle thick
65.7% depth I hope that is a typo.
How is that a constructive thing to say here Concepta?
And Luvsdmb, could you go and look at a setting like the one you originally wanted for it? Maybe that will make you like it all over again, or a halo or bezel might indeed help fix it catching and scratching.
ruby59|1374116806|3485225 said:65.7 depth? That is deep. Maybe a recut?
luvsdmb|1374156804|3485448 said:ruby59|1374116806|3485225 said:65.7 depth? That is deep. Maybe a recut?
What exactly would a re-cut do? I feel stupid for asking, but honestly I don't know much about diamonds.
.And if you like the stone, put it in something that looks good and works for you NOW, and then reset to something else later. You don't have to start all over on a ring just because you don't like the setting. That's throwing the baby out with the bathwater!
Niel|1374158101|3485470 said:im not sure a recut would work for you, it would probably drop it under a 1.5 ct, plus the clarity might keep it from being done.... but, it might make it easier to sell if you decide that....
but if it keeps scratching your LO, which i understand, my pear did that too, a bezel would be a good idea...if you decided to keep it, you could send it to brian gavin. They could evaluate it for a recut, and whether its good or not, they could then reset it in a sholdt bezel... and then youve got a really sleek ring.... but thats going to cost money, and i dont know if BG would even be able or willing to recut it
bastetcat|1374158334|3485475 said:Niel|1374158101|3485470 said:im not sure a recut would work for you, it would probably drop it under a 1.5 ct, plus the clarity might keep it from being done.... but, it might make it easier to sell if you decide that....
but if it keeps scratching your LO, which i understand, my pear did that too, a bezel would be a good idea...if you decided to keep it, you could send it to brian gavin. They could evaluate it for a recut, and whether its good or not, they could then reset it in a sholdt bezel... and then youve got a really sleek ring.... but thats going to cost money, and i dont know if BG would even be able or willing to recut it
It would almost certainly drop the actual weight below 1.5 if it's actually weighing right at 1.5, but the diameter of it is currently the diameter of about a 1.3 ct stone, and I doubt much actual diameter would be lost. It might be worth it, if it would work. If the diameter were closer to a 1.5ct then I'd probably not even suggest it but it isn't.
luvsdmb|1374151989|3485386 said:Polished|1374121395|3485259 said:luvsdmb, I sensed that your quest for the ring of your dreams had ceased to be a joy and had instead become something of a burden. I would just urge caution before deciding to sell. A poster here Maisie, who I hope won't mind if I mention her case as it's well documented. The long and short of it was that she became a bit preoccupied with the up-grading of the size of her diamonds to the point where she no longer enjoyed them but when she sold them she regretted that too. Something to be borne in mind is that selling your diamond might not provide the resolution you hope for. Would mothballing it in a safety deposit box in the bank put it sufficiently out of mind for you to postpone the ring dilemmas until you are in a shifted head space and possibly different life circumstances?
Yes Polished you are correct. The joy of my diamond is gone. Between not knowing what I want, missing my oval and my poor husband who just wishes I would do something that makes me happy so that I can stop thinking about rings.
If I could get what I want for it, no less than $8,500 I would be happy. At this point I feel like I would not regret selling it. I just got home from vacation and I stored my diamond in a safe. When I got home and picked up my diamond, I actually had the idea of oh crap not this damn thing again. I actually enjoyed being away from it, which is when I started thinking selling might be a good idea.
However if I can not get much for it, I will probably store it away again, just so I can take a break from it.
Niel|1374158490|3485479 said:bastetcat|1374158334|3485475 said:Niel|1374158101|3485470 said:im not sure a recut would work for you, it would probably drop it under a 1.5 ct, plus the clarity might keep it from being done.... but, it might make it easier to sell if you decide that....
but if it keeps scratching your LO, which i understand, my pear did that too, a bezel would be a good idea...if you decided to keep it, you could send it to brian gavin. They could evaluate it for a recut, and whether its good or not, they could then reset it in a sholdt bezel... and then youve got a really sleek ring.... but thats going to cost money, and i dont know if BG would even be able or willing to recut it
It would almost certainly drop the actual weight below 1.5 if it's actually weighing right at 1.5, but the diameter of it is currently the diameter of about a 1.3 ct stone, and I doubt much actual diameter would be lost. It might be worth it, if it would work. If the diameter were closer to a 1.5ct then I'd probably not even suggest it but it isn't.
true, I just was under the impression a cutter is reluctant to do it if it drops below a noteworthy ctw
bastetcat|1374161253|3485534 said:My question, though it's slightly off topic is if someone says recutting it doesn't increase the resale value, what resale are they speaking of? Retail? Because then I'd probably agree, a retailer would get more at the weight it is at. But secondary market? If on a not so well cut stone you are already looking at 50% or more loss on it, then how could recutting (if possible) to a more ideally proportioned stone with a good lab report be more of a loss than that?
Why would someone want to recut then? Well, I've seen a number of times on here where people had stones that were not all that well cut and didn't wear them and liked them after the recut, but I have yet to see a post where someone says I have this fabulously cut stone and I hate it and never wear it....