Thank you all so much for your responses, they have all been so useful! So I talked to my designer about lowering it and he said he could lower it a mm or so without problem. I think height wise that would really help. The only question I have is, if we set the stone lower (so that you can't see the point of the diamond anymore -- if you look carefully you can see a little triangle of air below the bottom of the stone and the point of the metal underneath it), will that make it so that less light reflects and thus it is less brilliant? In other words, does the stone always need to have some space under the cutlet (I think it is called) above the metal? I didn't ask the designer that question but wondered if you all had any thoughts on that? This community is so invaluable! We picked a really nice stone after learning more about the HCA and rejecting a bunch that looked good on GIA certs but performed poorly on HCA. Thank you so much!![]()
My personal preference would be a little lower. Victor Canera makes his at the perfect height, in my opinion. Here's one with his flush fit stems.
https://www.victorcanera.com/rings/engagement/the-emilya-with-flush-fitting-stems
As far as your second question goes, light return is from the top of the diamond. You could totally enclose the sides of a well cut diamond and it wouldn't matter, because light is reflected out of the top of the stone.
I am such a klutz that the ring would be too high for me.
However, if you are not a klutz and love how it pops, then go ahead!![]()
Hi!
Beautiful ring!Congratulations!
So I agree it's too high and that it should be lowered a bit. However! I think the diamond's placement in the head of the ring is actually really nice with that little air line and being able to see the culet. It would be a shame to remove it, perhaps.
Is there any ability to lower it by actually getting rid of some of the bottom of the prongs? To explain: in @Txborn79's ring that she kindly posted, you can see the diamond is set lower because the prongs come out of the shank with the v of the airline at the level of the shank. Yours has the v of the airline and then tonnes of metal from the prongs finishing a metal v, and then shank.
Sorry - if I were in a position to do some pictures that would be easier to explain but I hope that makes sense.
Anyway, if that bit of shank could be removed, I think it would widen the attachment of the head to make it more secure to the shank, still allow you to wear another ring flush to it, and make it seem less like a peg head that will be damaged by a bad hit.
Just my thoughts in addition to other very good thoughts here.
Good luck with whatever you choose to do!
Realistically, would shortening it by 1 mm make much of a visual difference ? I get it, I’m a numbers girl ... but “a mm” may not be significant enough.
Also, my ring is higher than yours- It hasn’t been “officially” given to me via the proposal that my bf wants, but I’ve been wearing it around the house.
I thought practically about this similar to what others have suggested. I tried to wear a glove (as I will have to in the 7/8 months of cold that we get here), and it’s nearly impossible.
Would 1 or 2 mm make a visual difference but also a practical difference for you ?
All that said, you have a stunning ringand I’m sure whatever you choose to do, it’ll look amazing.