- Joined
- Apr 3, 2004
- Messages
- 33,852
----------------
On 5/4/2004 11:08:12 AM Mara wrote:
However, do have to say Rhino that I think your conspiracy theory on this clique is a bit delusional...but don't take that personal.
----------------
----------------
On 5/4/2004 4:41:51 PM lop wrote:
Well, I'm not in on it either...(I'm always the last to know these things...)----------------![]()
Well, you're not alone, lop......I'm not in on it either, and I'm also in the "last to know" group.
Have to agree with Mara on this one.....I think you're reaching a bit on the clique theory, Rhino. Most of the regulars here (myself included) have no problem being fairly direct, so it wouldn't make sense that we'd have to whine to Leonid instead of telling you what we thought directly. (In fact, the candor in this thread is a ringing proof of that
----------------
On 5/5/2004 2:58:59 PM Rhino wrote:
What was discouraging to me is when I write a tutorial in an effort to help people learn about a new product/technolgy/etc. and I am accused of self promotion etc. and the kabash is put on something I thought would be a positive contribution to this forum. As I look back on the Jubilee thread I do understand to a degree the locking of the thread because of the fighting that some had started on there but if anyone reads through what I had written there are no pitches there.
Ex/Ex
----------------
----------------
On 5/6/2004 1:05:55 PM fire&ice wrote:
Rhino - I'll read the thread later & see if I can come up with specific. But, I did say it was my 'impression'. Often, it's not just one single thing. It's the direction of the thread.
But, I should go and check to see if something set me off. And, in general, I don't mind people oohh & ahhing over people's e-rings. *THAT's* exciting (both for the ring & the incredible life commitment it means). Off the cuff, it's when a vendor (insert anyone there) starts a thread & most reponses are how super fabulouso something is w/o any meat. It's not as bad here. But, makes me gag over at DT. That was part of it.
F&I - thinking aloud as usual. It's a fine line.
----------------
I appreicate that F&I and thanks for your response too Nicerez. Listen... at the same time I do not want to beat a dead horse here. If you think it more appropriate to respond via PM that is fine with me. I did think however that everyone would benefit from your response so that vendors/dealers/appraisers who wished to share new information, new and interesting products/technologies, etc. will learn from this experience too. As I reread that thread it was the whining of one person who (IMO) spoiled it for the rest of the group who wanted to learn more. The manufacturer was ready to come on and participate and help answer questions as he knew I was having laptop probs and I thought this would have contributed more to the positive aspects/experience of the PS forum. Perhaps I am mistaken becuase I AM SURE that person would have also complained about that too.
I know Dave Atlas is involved in a new technology which I am dying to learn more about and I think the consumers here would benefit from (contributing to the positive aspects of this forum) plus there have been updates to some technologies regarding the cut grading of fancies (all shapes) which I feel the consumers can benefit from as well. At this point I am afraid to share this information here as I am sure Dave would have 2nd thoughts posting about his project on the forum since he would benefit from the technology he is involved with although it is for the ultimate good of everyone. At this point we will not be sharing any new information until we know we can do so safely and with clear conscience. As Nicerez pointed out ... we do not want to offend Leonid and go against any of his rules. He is DA MAN.
----------------
On 5/6/2004 10:51:26 AM fire&ice wrote:
Well, I'm being brutally honest. The jubliee thread started out as informative and interesting. THEN, it crossed the line into self promotion of a new line. I made no bones about it (within the thread). It *evolved* into self promotion. The love fest for 'chas' was the final straw for me. Quite frankly, the excitement (for me) about the jubilee was lost. You call it enthusiasm. I saw it as hype. Perhaps it wasn't your intention; but, non the less, what came across. In this instance, a forum for new products, the consumer fully armed w/ the knowledge that it's advertising, is a good one.----------------
On 5/5/2004 2:58:59 PM Rhino wrote:
What was discouraging to me is when I write a tutorial in an effort to help people learn about a new product/technolgy/etc. and I am accused of self promotion etc. and the kabash is put on something I thought would be a positive contribution to this forum. As I look back on the Jubilee thread I do understand to a degree the locking of the thread because of the fighting that some had started on there but if anyone reads through what I had written there are no pitches there.
Ex/Ex
----------------
----------------
Rhino, you know I love ya, but I have to say that I agree with F&I on this.
I fully support posting information on new cuts, etc that may come out, and I was glad to see the information on the Jubilee. But let's be honest.....if the purpose is EDUCATION about the stone, that's what it should be limited to.
I reread that thread. I saw the following questions asked in the thread: 1) Is it similar to the Regent in needing a more open setting to allow more light in; 2) How does this compare to the 88-cut diamond?; 3) What will availability by like in total and on larger stones?; 4) How are the measurements taken?
These are all excellent questions that deal with *education* about the stone. All of them went unanswered. That seems to fly in the face of *educational* purposes.
Also, all of these questions were asked on 4/20. When you did come back on 4/21, you posted a lengthy post....and not a single word of it had anything to do with the stone you were educating people about, nor did it address any of the questions asked thusfar. It talked about the people in your store....who helps scan and analyze the stones, who's married to whom, how your presentations will be done on plasma once the renovation is complete (which *does* sound like a pitch, by the way). While all of that is nice background information, it's better suited in the who's who.
I didn't complain to Leonid about it because honestly, I've come to expect it and to me, it's not that big a deal. I don't get ruffled about it...I just move on. You know I don't mince words, and that I'm not shy to offer an opinion against the grain. If I had a problem with it, you know I'm direct enough to say it to you myself.
I don't doubt your sincerity when you say you don't *mean* for it to sound promotional, but nonetheless, you have earned a fairly widespread reputation for "skirting the line". The fact that several people perceive it this way might be worth your consideration.
I'm not posting this to pick on you......I'm posting to *come and show you* as you asked. It's offered with all the best intentions because I hold you in high regard. I appreciate that you participation here, and it would deeply disturb me if anyone felt unfairly singled out or held to a higher unreasonable standard. I'm not going to debate my comments; they are what they are. You can take it under advisement and really consider it, or you can dismiss it out of hand. I'm not offended either way.
I'm also posting this because I don't want to miss out on learning about new cuts because this stuff gets in the way.
----------------
On 5/6/2004 1:56:07 PM Rhino wrote:
I would agree elmo, however I do not see any love fest going on there for Chas. I gave a simple intro. He said hi, made a comment or 2 about working with us, people welcomed him and that was it. No gushing or sappiness from what I could see.
----------------