Princess cut diamond: depth 73.5, table 73

[yanksmtm]

Are these bad measurements? I saw another stone that has a depth of 72.5 and a table of 67.

I know with princess cut stones it is hard to make general statements, but any input would be appreciated.

 

[yanksmtm]

Hi Michelle, thank you for responding. Figuring out all the intricities of a princess cut diamond has been very difficult, and I think I have narrowed it down to the two choices listed. I have attached the GIA reports for both, can you recommend one over the other? I know for princess cuts photos would be preferred, but I dont have those available.

Thanks again!

 

[yanksmtm]

Is there anyone that could give me some input on this? It would be much appreciated.

 

[JulieN]

Which one do you like better?

 

[ecf8503]

What kind of input are you looking for? Numbers don't make or break a stone, especially fancy cuts like this. And a smaller table isn't necessarily bad - Solasfera princesses often have 60% tables and 75% depths (but those are super-ideal cuts that were designed that way from the ground up - not your "everyday" princess).

If you are have it narrowed down to these 2 stones (and aren't asking for our input to find one for you) then you have to trust your own eyes. Look at them in all kinds of lighting, and see which one speaks to you. We can't see it - you can.