Performance differences

[Tac0010]

Hi,

This is all very new so bear with me. I've been looking at the 2 diamonds below and have would like your opinions. Which would be the better choice in terms of performance and why?

http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-2962070.htm

Light Performance Ideal
Polish Ideal
Symmetry Ideal
Diamond Information
Item Code AGS-104065698006
Category Expert Selection
Shape Round
Carat 0.801
Color I
Clarity VS2
Cut Ideal
Depth % 62.7
Table % 56.0
Crown Angle 35.9
Star 49.0
Pavilion Angle 40.8
Crown % 16.0
Lower Girdle % 76.0
Measurements 5.90x5.92x3.71
Culet Pointed
Fluorescence Negligible
Girdle Thin to Slightly Thick Faceted


http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-3022076.htm#

Eye Clean Yes
Light Performance Ideal
Polish Ideal
Symmetry Ideal
Diamond Information
Item Code AGS-104067556024
Category Expert Selection
Shape Round
Carat 0.831
Color F
Clarity SI1
Cut Ideal
Depth % 60.8
Table % 57.5
Crown Angle 34.8
Star 58.0
Pavilion Angle 40.8
Crown % 14.8
Lower Girdle % 79.0
Measurements 6.06x6.08x3.69
Culet Pointed
Fluorescence Negligible
Girdle Thin to Medium Faceted

 

[JulieN]

You should ask WF, they can look at them and advise you better.

 

[jramy278]

Seems to me that the first stone is quite deep at 62.7% and is probably why there's some leakage under the table (and gets an HCA of 3.5ish). However, to figure out if that's significant enough when compared to the other stone, you'd have to ask for WF's recommendation.

 

[c-k]

Both stones are AGSL Ideal and should perform but if it were me...the .83, I like the shallow cut better