- Oct 21, 2007
My favourites are the Michael B petite princes and the shared prong - memoire. Tough choice!
p.s. Also, the channel set pic I posted is not the actual channel set I would consider. That was just a random channel set. The one I would consider would be Sasha Primak''s. They would be able to make either a 2.4mm with 5/8ct or a 2.6mm with about .80ct. They would make one with thinner sides/low profile sides (special request) so you see more diamond than metal. Here is a pic of their 2.4mm with normal sides.
Ohhhh, there are so many pretty bands!! The bands that I would like to own one day (eventually) are the memoire single shared prong in .75ct, a tiffany shared prong eternity (I think tiffany''s has straighter edges than the memoire shared prong and that just happens to look better with my e-ring. The Memoire''s has bumpier edges I think.I''d probably go with this now, except it is $5,900 for .80ct 2mm band...WAY too much $ now), the michael B petit princess, maybe a channel set with thin sides. Gosh.....it''s just about which one to go with NOW, as my wedding band. I think I am leaning either on the Michael B Princess or the Sasha Primak thin sided channel, maybe more towards Michael B princess because channels are so much more common, although the channel might look better along because it will be a little thicker. Hmmm...
I agree. I personally really like it when the band "references" the centre stone. The way these stones are set look like they are really mirroring the solitaire if that makes sense?