I just made my first post in another thread asking for opinions on an engagement ring under $2k used. I found this one as well. I'm going back and forth between the 2. Opinions sooo welcome, I'm in over my head.
Link with a video of the ring:
Here's the ad:
"This is a vintage, circa 1950's diamond and 14K white gold engagement ring. The ring is securely set in four fishtail prongs with a center, full cut, fully faceted, high quality, superbly cut, polished and proportioned .65CT round brilliant diamond measuring 5.58 MM in diameter by 3.39 MM deep with a 60% depth, 59% table, medium girdle, no florescence and no culet, of G color and VVS clarity. It is accented with two (2) desirable tapered baguette diamonds of H color and VVS clarity totaling .15CT. That makes the total in all natural, genuine, untreated, nicely matched, bright, white, fiery diamonds with absolutely no visible imperfections .80CT. The 3 gram ring is marked, tested and guaranteed 14K and is a size 7 1/4. It has been professionally cleaned and brightly polished and is ready for presentation"
Link with a video of the ring:
Here's the ad:
"This is a vintage, circa 1950's diamond and 14K white gold engagement ring. The ring is securely set in four fishtail prongs with a center, full cut, fully faceted, high quality, superbly cut, polished and proportioned .65CT round brilliant diamond measuring 5.58 MM in diameter by 3.39 MM deep with a 60% depth, 59% table, medium girdle, no florescence and no culet, of G color and VVS clarity. It is accented with two (2) desirable tapered baguette diamonds of H color and VVS clarity totaling .15CT. That makes the total in all natural, genuine, untreated, nicely matched, bright, white, fiery diamonds with absolutely no visible imperfections .80CT. The 3 gram ring is marked, tested and guaranteed 14K and is a size 7 1/4. It has been professionally cleaned and brightly polished and is ready for presentation"
300x240.png)