Firediamond
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2018
- Messages
- 6
By the numbers, this is a nicely proportioned stone. Can you get an Idealscope image, or better yet a ASET image? GIA is very reputable, but they round their numbers in such a way as to make it important to be sure they translate to good performance. How much is this stone?
Thanks for the reply. I've attached the Idealscope image provided.https://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-4037185.htm
https://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-4059351.htm
Some options close in size, but super-ideal.
The stone is very tilted. The arrows on the north (also where that very bright white is located) are missing. So, ignore that area (blue circle). Then, visually remove the amount of white you see in the middle from the table. What's left is leakage. I've highlighted the areas where I think there is real leakage. So, this looks to be one of the many stones we now see with highly variable lowers. So, its giving up some light due to that uneven cutting.
For my money, I'd rather the below stone. It is basically the same in size and spread. It is eye-clean and has not problematic inclusions. Its LESS expensive and has much better light return than the one directly above. Bonus here is that Expert Select from WF are given the same very generous upgrade policy as ACA.
https://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-2962077.htm
My computer refuses to play the video or maybe its missing (@Texas Leaguer ). The video would show the inclusion better, but I've not seen a stone WF notes as eye-clean that I'd disagree with.