Julie,Date: 5/3/2007 6:23:14 PM
Author: JulieN
At the extremes of the Excellent cut grade, there are proportions that would not perform as well as proportions near the VG/EX border.
I feel like D/E VVS2/VS1 is a better balance than F VVS1.
Date: 5/3/2007 7:35:14 PM
Author: elmo
You hit the nail on the head - under 2 carats at a 2 carat price. It would be a much better ''value'' (if you can call it that) to get something just over 2 carats at a similar price per carat. p.s. I agree with Julie, I''d rather have 2 carats and D-E VVS2-VS1 at about the same price.Date: 5/3/2007 12:38:41 PM
Author:ctnsf2000
I am shopping for a diamond and wanted to know if I am being over charged for this diamond since it is shy of 2.00 carat and demanding a close to 2 carat price.
It''s facing up a wee bit small, even though we don''t have the true diameter. You know both numbers are in the 7''s. Ideally it should face up somewhere around 8.10-8.12. Not horrible, and at this size, not noticable.Date: 5/3/2007 7:36:32 PM
Author: ctnsf2000
Here are the specs!!!
Table: 56%
Depth: 62.5%
Pav Angle:40.8%
Crown Angle: 35.5%
Girdle - Medium to slightly thick (faceted) Does this make the stone look smaller?
Please advise if this diamond will perform well.
I personally wouldn''t think so.Date: 5/3/2007 8:01:39 PM
Author: ctnsf2000
The similar diamond at 2.01, it will cost 39.5K which is 2.5K more for .05 carat differences. Is that worth it?
I am guessing here, and Julie please correct me if I''m wrong.Date: 5/3/2007 7:51:27 PM
Author: ctnsf2000
Julie,Date: 5/3/2007 6:23:14 PM
Author: JulieN
At the extremes of the Excellent cut grade, there are proportions that would not perform as well as proportions near the VG/EX border.
I feel like D/E VVS2/VS1 is a better balance than F VVS1.
I have been told that D and E stones look very similar while F is closer to G. However, when I put the E an F stone next to each other, I could not see the color difference. The brilliance sort of overtook the color in the 2 diamonds I compared.
I even put it on a white piece of paper and I could not see the difference. Am I not placing them correctly to see the contrast?
Ellen,Date: 5/3/2007 8:06:15 PM
Author: Ellen
It''s facing up a wee bit small, even though we don''t have the true diameter. You know both numbers are in the 7''s. Ideally it should face up somewhere around 8.10-8.12. Not horrible, and at this size, not noticable.Date: 5/3/2007 7:36:32 PM
Author: ctnsf2000
Here are the specs!!!
Table: 56%
Depth: 62.5%
Pav Angle:40.8%
Crown Angle: 35.5%
Girdle - Medium to slightly thick (faceted) Does this make the stone look smaller?
Please advise if this diamond will perform well.
As for how it will perform, we can''t know that. GIA rounds there numbers (so these don''t tell the whole story), so you''d need to at least get a Sarin report, and preferably an IS or ASET image.
Diamond prices are based on distinct weight ranges. The price per carat for a diamond in one weight range is normally much higher than in the next lower range. A premium is charged for "oversize" stones at the higher end of a range. But not nearly as much as is asked in this case. Although I think where it's as close as it is here it's not uncommon. Just not something I'd do myself. I'd rather have 1.8x and save 20-30%/carat, assuming you can find this, or have two carats.Date: 5/3/2007 8:01:39 PM
Author: ctnsf2000
The similar diamond at 2.01, it will cost 39.5K which is 2.5K more for .05 carat differences. Is that worth it?
That is the problem I can''t quite get over with this stone either.Date: 5/3/2007 8:16:52 PM
Author: elmo
Diamond prices are based on distinct weight ranges. The price per carat for a diamond in one weight range normally much higher than in the next lower range. A premium is charged for ''oversize'' stones at the higher end of a range. But not nearly as much as is asked in this case. Although I think where it''s as close as it is here isn''t uncommon. Just not something I''d do myself.Date: 5/3/2007 8:01:39 PM
Author: ctnsf2000
The similar diamond at 2.01, it will cost 39.5K which is 2.5K more for .05 carat differences. Is that worth it?
Can a 1.8x look close to a 2.0?Date: 5/3/2007 8:16:52 PM
Author: elmo
Diamond prices are based on distinct weight ranges. The price per carat for a diamond in one weight range is normally much higher than in the next lower range. A premium is charged for ''oversize'' stones at the higher end of a range. But not nearly as much as is asked in this case. Although I think where it''s as close as it is here it''s not uncommon. Just not something I''d do myself. I''d rather have 1.8x and save 20-30%/carat, assuming you can find this, or have two carats.Date: 5/3/2007 8:01:39 PM
Author: ctnsf2000
The similar diamond at 2.01, it will cost 39.5K which is 2.5K more for .05 carat differences. Is that worth it?
These stones are with a retailer.Date: 5/3/2007 8:29:14 PM
Author: Ellen
A 1.8 will definitely give the ''look'' of a 2 ct., assuming it''s facing up as it should.
As for the other stone you posted, we still need everything I listed before.
Can I ask, are you looking online or privately?
Ok! Do you know if he carries any AGS000? THAT would be a much easier, much safer way to go. They grade on light performance, and give accurate numbers. In other words, they pretty much take the guess work out.Date: 5/3/2007 8:40:44 PM
Author: ctnsf2000
These stones are with a retailer.