freddyboston
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2023
- Messages
- 638
Yes...Ancient Diamonds have Trigons.....
and souls
But you've already been given a factual response numerous times in numerous threads.
Is there a different way that the same answer needs to be worded which will provide you full appeasement?
I'm genuinely confused why you continue this crusade for an answer that has already been given to not only you, but the entire world:
From a different GIA article...the wording that you're looking for is right there: three rough diamonds each from a different origin:
![]()
No, DejaWiz, I’m good, thanks.
Excellent, glad that you found peace about it, Chelsea Palmer - your fantastic and perfectly synthesized human grown diamond is perfect: clean HPHT material, amazing cut precision, GIA graded with the AGS addendum showing ASET imaging - there was a lot of painstaking talent and pure soul poured into growing, cutting, and polishing your diamond...and it will soon truly be a treasure now that GIA will be dumbing themselves down on their upcoming lacking approach to LGD grading.
To be clear, I was never not at peace with my…my…well, I don’t know what to call it any longer. I freaking LOVE it, even though I don’t what “it” is
Ooooh, the natural diamond has what looks like alien hieroglyphs on the upper part and what looks like a 6-fingered hand pointing to a cloud on the lower. Proof that aliens exist!!
Pie anyone?
So a diamond grown in a lab is a lab-grown diamond. Or a synthetic diamond. Or a man-made diamond. A poster referred to LGDs as knockoffs and that’s where I was confused. Wasn’t sure how something called a diamond could be a knock-off of a diamond.It's a lab/synthetic diamond. Like how we explained synthetic gemstones. If you drop the prefix then it becomes misleading.
So a diamond grown in a lab is a lab-grown diamond. Or a synthetic diamond. Or a man-made diamond. A poster referred to LGDs as knockoffs and that’s where I was confused. Wasn’t sure how something called a diamond could be a knock-off of a diamond.
But you've already been given a factual response numerous times in numerous threads.
Is there a different way that the same answer needs to be worded which will provide you full appeasement?
I'm genuinely confused why you continue this crusade for an answer that has already been given to not only you, but the entire world:
From a different GIA article...the wording that you're looking for is right there: three rough diamonds each from a different origin:
![]()
So we have confirmed a lab-grown diamond is a diamond.
The second part is about provenance. It matters to some and doesn't matter to others. No matter what examples we give it won't satisfy you. Just enjoy what you have and try not to defend it here.
This is a very interesting picture, I had not seen synthetic rough before. All three have been carved/cut in some way already I guess. This image minimizes the apparent differences in a way that feels intentional. I'd be curious to see all three in their "rough rough" forms right out of the vat/ground.
Crazy how people care so much what others spend their money on or their views. It almost feels political
The CVD is in the “rough rough” form.This is a very interesting picture, I had not seen synthetic rough before. All three have been carved/cut in some way already I guess. This image minimizes the apparent differences in a way that feels intentional. I'd be curious to see all three in their "rough rough" forms right out of the vat/ground.
Freddy, you can dismiss diamonds created by the ingenuity of mankind as "fluffy" and those as grubbed from the earth and scarring the earth terribly, as important. Most of us with common sense aren't buying that spiel. My diamonds are natural and if you would buy them back from me at a price close to what we paid, I'm all in. And then I'll go buy the diamonds created by the ingenuity of mankind to fill the void.
As a mother in the sixties, to me it's like trying to convince me to use cotton gauze diapers again to rinse out in the toilet vs the disposable diapers that are readily available in today's child raising. It won't happen and I'll gladly use the money saved buying a beautiful mankind created diamond vs that grubbed from the earth and the resultant scarring. I would have used the thousands saved in the purchase of created diamonds to travel far and wide.
When it comes down to it, it is all just "stuff".
In the above sample it is still above my budget. I haven't checked into the pricing of non premium cut .5ct diamonds such as WF ACA, but the Jannpaul Decagon in the .4 to .5 is $2600 to $3800. I assume if the cut ends up at .4 would be the lower price and the .5 would be the higher price.Even the $2600. I suppose if it came put on the lower end I could do it, but I really would like at least a 1ct premium cut which is most definitely not in my budget.
I suppose I could make myself downsize since the halo she really liked only had a .3ct centerstone. I'm still going to explore options with an online appointment with JP tomorrow night, but my 3 month old son has been expose to Whooping Cough by his 1 year old cousin. If he catches it whatever money I have for an engagement ring becomes secondary to taking care of him. If you all are into prayer, I ask for it for my son Arthur James to avoid getting it., and his cousin and family really need it. Dragon is about 16 months old and is in the hospital ICU on a ventilator. According to my SO, the doctor say its 50/50 for him.![]()
The CVD is in the “rough rough” form.